Ge–Yb phases

11 phases (tier A 6, tier C 4, liquid 1); 10 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Ge–Yb system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Ge–Yb system (11)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
DIAMOND_A4 phase:ge-yb:a4-diamond	C (diamond) · A4 · cF8 · Fd-3m (227)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1213.6 K, x(Yb) 0–0	3	2
BCC_A2 phase:ge-yb:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1033–1090 K, x(Yb) 1–1	0	2
FCC_A1 phase:ge-yb:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1088 K, x(Yb) 1–1	3	2
GE10YB11 phase:ge-yb:ge10yb11	Ge10Ho11 · tI84 · I4/mmm (139)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1777.83 K, x(Yb) 0.52381–0.52381	6	2
GE3YB5_D88 phase:ge-yb:ge3yb5-d88	Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1857.88 K, x(Yb) 0.625–0.625	6	2
GE4YB5 phase:ge-yb:ge4yb5	Ge4Sm5 · oP36 · Pnma (62)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1914.51 K, x(Yb) 0.55556–0.55556	6	2
GE5YB3 phase:ge-yb:ge5yb3	Pd5Th3 · hP8 · P-62m (189)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1351.33 K, x(Yb) 0.375–0.375	6	2
GE8YB3 phase:ge-yb:ge8yb3	Ge8Yb3 · aP22 · P-1 (2)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1141.02 K, x(Yb) 0.27273–0.27273	6	2
GEYB2_C37 phase:ge-yb:geyb2-c37	Co2Si · C37 · oP12 · Pnma (62)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1477.86 K, x(Yb) 0.66667–0.66667	6	2
HCP_A3 phase:ge-yb:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
LIQUID phase:ge-yb:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1003.43–2500 K, x(Yb) 0–1	24	2

DIAMOND_A4 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:a4-diamond; status assigned
Structure: C (diamond) · A4 · cF8 · Fd-3m (227); type st:a4-c-diamond-cf8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1213.6 K, x(Yb) 0–0
Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:a4-diamond, corpus:phase:ge-yb:diamond-a4
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:(Ge)
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:DIAMOND_A4, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:DIAMOND_A4

TDB models of DIAMOND_A4 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: DIAMOND_A4, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

48: PHASE DIAMOND_A4 % 1 1 !
49: CONST DIAMOND_A4 : GE : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: DIAMOND_A4, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

44: PHASE DIAMOND_A4 % 1 1 !
45: CONST DIAMOND_A4 : GE% YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

BCC_A2 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1033–1090 K, x(Yb) 1–1
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

38: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
39: CONST BCC_A2 : GE YB% : VA : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

34: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
35: CONST BCC_A2 : GE YB% : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1088 K, x(Yb) 1–1
Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:fcc-a1
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Fcc_A1
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

33: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
34: CONST FCC_A1 : GE YB% : VA : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

29: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
30: CONST FCC_A1 : GE YB% : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GE10YB11 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:ge10yb11; status assigned
Structure: Ge10Ho11 · tI84 · I4/mmm (139); type st:ge10ho11-ti84; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.4762, Yb 0.5238
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1777.83 K, x(Yb) 0.52381–0.52381
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:ge10yb11
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb11Ge10
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GE10YB11, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GE10YB11

TDB models of GE10YB11 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GE10YB11, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

63: PHASE GE10YB11 % 2 10 11 !
64: CONST GE10YB11 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GE10YB11, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

59: PHASE GE10YB11 % 2 10 11 !
60: CONST GE10YB11 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GE3YB5_D88 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:ge3yb5-d88; status assigned
Structure: Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193); type st:d8-8-mn5si3-hp16; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.3750, Yb 0.6250
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1857.88 K, x(Yb) 0.625–0.625
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:ge3yb5-d88
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb5Ge3
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GE3YB5_D88, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GE3YB5_D88

TDB models of GE3YB5_D88 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GE3YB5_D88, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

73: PHASE GE3YB5_D88 % 2 3 5 !
74: CONST GE3YB5_D88 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GE3YB5_D88, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

69: PHASE GE3YB5_D88 % 2 3 5 !
70: CONST GE3YB5_D88 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GE4YB5 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:ge4yb5; status assigned
Structure: Ge4Sm5 · oP36 · Pnma (62); type st:ge4sm5-op36; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.4444, Yb 0.5556
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1914.51 K, x(Yb) 0.55556–0.55556
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:ge4yb5
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb5Ge4
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GE4YB5, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GE4YB5

TDB models of GE4YB5 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GE4YB5, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

68: PHASE GE4YB5 % 2 4 5 !
69: CONST GE4YB5 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GE4YB5, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

64: PHASE GE4YB5 % 2 4 5 !
65: CONST GE4YB5 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GE5YB3 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:ge5yb3; status assigned
Structure: Pd5Th3 · hP8 · P-62m (189); type st:pd5th3-hp8; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.6250, Yb 0.3750
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1351.33 K, x(Yb) 0.375–0.375
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:ge5yb3
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb3Ge5
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GE5YB3, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GE5YB3

TDB models of GE5YB3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GE5YB3, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

58: PHASE GE5YB3 % 2 5 3 !
59: CONST GE5YB3 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GE5YB3, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

54: PHASE GE5YB3 % 2 5 3 !
55: CONST GE5YB3 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GE8YB3 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:ge8yb3; status assigned
Structure: Ge8Yb3 · aP22 · P-1 (2); type st:ge8yb3-ap22; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.7273, Yb 0.2727
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1141.02 K, x(Yb) 0.27273–0.27273
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:ge8yb3
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb3Ge8
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GE8YB3, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GE8YB3

TDB models of GE8YB3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GE8YB3, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

53: PHASE GE8YB3 % 2 8 3 !
54: CONST GE8YB3 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GE8YB3, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

49: PHASE GE8YB3 % 2 8 3 !
50: CONST GE8YB3 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

GEYB2_C37 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:geyb2-c37; status assigned
Structure: Co2Si · C37 · oP12 · Pnma (62); type st:c37-co2si-op12; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ge 0.3333, Yb 0.6667
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1477.86 K, x(Yb) 0.66667–0.66667
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:geyb2-c37
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:Yb2Ge
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:GEYB2_C37, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:GEYB2_C37

TDB models of GEYB2_C37 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: GEYB2_C37, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

78: PHASE GEYB2_C37 % 2 1 2 !
79: CONST GEYB2_C37 : GE : YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: GEYB2_C37, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

74: PHASE GEYB2_C37 % 2 1 2 !
75: CONST GEYB2_C37 : GE : YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

43: PHASE HCP_A3 % 2 1 0.5 !
44: CONST HCP_A3 : GE YB : VA : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

39: PHASE HCP_A3 % 2 1 0.5 !
40: CONST HCP_A3 : GE YB : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

LIQUID (Ge–Yb)

Id: phase:ge-yb:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1003.43–2500 K, x(Yb) 0–1
Literature: 24 values (24 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:ge-yb:liquid
paper: paper:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217:L
tdb: tdb:GeYb-18Ach.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:GeYb-18Zhu.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

GeYb-18Ach.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 dbdc29c38dccdf3b…

28: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
29: CONST LIQUID:L : GE YB : !

GeYb-18Zhu.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 b4ad8aa28cce9dad…

24: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
25: CONST LIQUID:L : GE YB : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217 Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018).
assessment that models this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}