# In–Li phases > In–Li system: 11 phases (tier A 6, tier B 1, tier C 2, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 9 stable in a calculated diagram in the ORCHID phase registry, with names, structure type when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules, calculated stability, verbatim TDB PHASE/CONSTITUENT statements and example references. HTML: https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/pages/IN-LI.html · Markdown: https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/pages/IN-LI.md 11 phases (tier A 6, tier B 1, tier C 2, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 9 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model). Data: [interactive registry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/?q=IN-LI) · [full JSON](https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/systems/IN-LI.json) · [In–Li system page](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/IN-LI.html) · [Markdown](https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/pages/IN-LI.md) · [field reference](https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/SCHEMA.md) Table: Phases of the In–Li system (11) | Phase | Structure | Basis | Stability (calculated) | Literature values | TDB models | |---|---|---|---|---:|---:| | [TETRAGONAL_A6](#phase-in-li-a6-tetragonal); _phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal_ | In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–432.71 K, x(Li) 0–0.05008 | 3 | 2 | | [BCC_A2](#phase-in-li-bcc-a2); _phase:in-li:bcc-a2_ | W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–454.6 K, x(Li) 1–1 | 3 | 2 | | [FCC_A1](#phase-in-li-fcc-a1); _phase:in-li:fcc-a1_ | Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225) | tier A: standard phase name | not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s) | 0 | 2 | | [HCP_A3](#phase-in-li-hcp-a3); _phase:in-li:hcp-a3_ | Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194) | tier A: standard phase name | not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s) | 0 | 2 | | [IN2LI3](#phase-in-li-in2li3); _phase:in-li:in2li3_ | Al2Li3 · hR5 · R-3m (166) | tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table) | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–583.64 K, x(Li) 0.6–0.6 | 2 | 2 | | [IN3LI13](#phase-in-li-in3li13); _phase:in-li:in3li13_ | In3Li13 · cF128 · Fd-3m (227) | tier B: DFT-supported (unique MP + OQMD match) | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–673.13 K, x(Li) 0.8125–0.8125 | 4 | 2 | | [INLI_B32](#phase-in-li-inli-b32); _phase:in-li:inli-b32_ | NaTl · B32 · cF16 · Fd-3m (227) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–901.58 K, x(Li) 0.36842–0.75198 | 16 | 2 | | [INLI2](#phase-in-li-inli2); _phase:in-li:inli2_ | GaLi2 · oC12 · Cmcm (63) | tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table) | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–737.89 K, x(Li) 0.66653–0.70585 | 5 | 2 | | [INLI3_L12](#phase-in-li-inli3-l12); _phase:in-li:inli3-l12_ | AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–618.95 K, x(Li) 0.75–0.75 | 0 | 1 | | [INLI6](#phase-in-li-inli6); _phase:in-li:inli6_ | | needs_review | stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–579.52 K, x(Li) 0.85714–0.85714 | 4 | 1 | | [LIQUID](#phase-in-li-liquid); _phase:in-li:liquid_ | liquid | liquid | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 429.75–2500 K, x(Li) 0–1 | 17 | 2 | ## TETRAGONAL_A6 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal`; status `assigned` - Structure: In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139); type `st:a6-in-ti2`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–432.71 K, x(Li) 0–0.05008 - Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal) Names (4): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:(In) _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6 ### TDB models of TETRAGONAL_A6 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 46: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 ! 47: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN% LI : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 55: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 ! 56: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN% LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (4 of 4; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1139/v76-150](https://doi.org/10.1139/v76-150) W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## BCC_A2 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:bcc-a2`; status `assigned` - Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type `st:a2-w-ci2`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–454.6 K, x(Li) 1–1 - Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:bcc-a2) Names (4): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:bcc-a2 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:(Li) _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:BCC_A2 ### TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 36: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 ! 37: CONST BCC_A2 : IN LI% : VA : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 45: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 ! 46: CONST BCC_A2 : IN LI% : VA : ! ~~~~ Example references (4 of 4; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1139/v76-150](https://doi.org/10.1139/v76-150) W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## FCC_A1 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:fcc-a1`; status `assigned` - Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type `st:a1-cu-cf4`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s) - Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:fcc-a1) Names (3): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:fcc-a1 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:FCC_A1 ### TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 31: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 ! 32: CONST FCC_A1 : IN LI : VA : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 40: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 ! 41: CONST FCC_A1 : IN LI : VA : ! ~~~~ Example references (2 of 2; assessments first): - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase_ ## HCP_A3 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:hcp-a3`; status `assigned` - Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type `st:a3-mg-hp2`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s) - Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:hcp-a3) Names (3): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:hcp-a3 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:HCP_A3 ### TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 41: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 ! 42: CONST HCP_A3 : IN LI : VA : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 50: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 ! 51: CONST HCP_A3 : IN LI : VA : ! ~~~~ Example references (2 of 2; assessments first): - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase_ ## IN2LI3 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:in2li3`; status `assigned` - Structure: Al2Li3 · hR5 · R-3m (166); type `st:al2li3-hr5`; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated - Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833) - Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (dft_space_group_166_matches_3_structure_types, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system - Stoichiometry: In 0.4000, Li 0.6000 - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–583.64 K, x(Li) 0.6–0.6 - Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:in2li3) Names (4): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:in2li3 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:In2Li3 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:IN2LI3, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:IN2LI3 ### TDB models of IN2LI3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): IN2LI3, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 56: PHASE IN2LI3 % 2 2 3 ! 57: CONST IN2LI3 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): IN2LI3, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 65: PHASE IN2LI3 % 2 2 3 ! 66: CONST IN2LI3 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (3 of 3; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## IN3LI13 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:in3li13`; status `assigned` - Structure: In3Li13 · cF128 · Fd-3m (227); type `st:in3li13-cf128`; tier B: DFT-supported (unique MP + OQMD match); confidence high - Stoichiometry: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125 - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–673.13 K, x(Li) 0.8125–0.8125 - Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:in3li13) Names (6): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:in3li13 _mp: _mp:mp-aaabdbby _oqmd: _oqmd:oqmd-646812 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:In3Li13 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:IN3LI13, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:IN3LI13 ### TDB models of IN3LI13 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): IN3LI13, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 71: PHASE IN3LI13 % 2 3 13 ! 72: CONST IN3LI13 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): IN3LI13, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 75: PHASE IN3LI13 % 2 3 13 ! 76: CONST IN3LI13 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (3 of 3; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## INLI_B32 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:inli-b32`; status `assigned` - Structure: NaTl · B32 · cF16 · Fd-3m (227); type `st:b32-natl-cf16`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Caveat: partitioned order/disorder model in InLi-20Zho.tdb also describes the disordered state - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–901.58 K, x(Li) 0.36842–0.75198 - Literature: 16 values (16 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:inli-b32) Names (4): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:inli-b32 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI_B32, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI_B32 ### TDB models of INLI_B32 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): INLI_B32, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 51: PHASE INLI_B32 % 2 1 1 ! 52: CONST INLI_B32 : IN% LI : IN LI% : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): INLI_B32, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 60: PHASE INLI_B32 % 2 1 1 ! 61: CONST INLI_B32 : IN% LI : LI% VA : ! ~~~~ Example references (6 of 6; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1002/zaac.19562860302](https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19562860302) A. Schneider, O. Hilmer, Wärmeinhalte und Schmelzentropien von NaTl‐Phasen, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 286, 97-117 (1956). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1002/zaac.19703760107](https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703760107) Renate Thümmel, Wilhelm Klemm, Das Verhalten der Alkalimetalle zu den Metallen der Gruppe III B, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 376, 44-63 (1970). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1139/v76-150](https://doi.org/10.1139/v76-150) W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## INLI2 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:inli2`; status `assigned` - Structure: GaLi2 · oC12 · Cmcm (63); type `st:gali2-oc12`; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated - Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833) - Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_structure_token, off_stoichiometric_model); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–737.89 K, x(Li) 0.66653–0.70585 - Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:inli2) Names (4): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:inli2 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi2 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI2, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI2 ### TDB models of INLI2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): INLI2, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 61: PHASE INLI2 % 2 1 2 ! 62: CONST INLI2 : IN% LI : IN LI% : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): INLI2, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 70: PHASE INLI2 % 2 1 2 ! 71: CONST INLI2 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (3 of 3; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## INLI3_L12 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:inli3-l12`; status `assigned` - Structure: AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221); type `st:l1-2-aucu3-cp4`; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: In 0.2500, Li 0.7500 - Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–618.95 K, x(Li) 0.75–0.75 - Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:inli3-l12) Names (2): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:inli3-l12 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI3_L12 ### TDB models of INLI3_L12 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): INLI3_L12, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 66: PHASE INLI3_L12 % 2 1 3 ! 67: CONST INLI3_L12 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (1 of 1; assessments first): - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ ## INLI6 (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:inli6`; status `needs_review` - No structure assigned. Why: no_on_hull_entry_in_both; no_structure_token; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete - Candidate (literature_printed): (InLi6) · ? — printed with a label mapped to this phase - Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (InLi6) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for INLI6: InLi6 - Stoichiometry: In 0.1429, Li 0.8571 - Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–579.52 K, x(Li) 0.85714–0.85714 - Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:inli6) Names (3): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:inli6 _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi6 _tdb: _tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI6 ### TDB models of INLI6 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): INLI6, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 80: PHASE INLI6 % 2 1 6 ! 81: CONST INLI6 : IN : LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (3 of 3; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1139/v76-150](https://doi.org/10.1139/v76-150) W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## LIQUID (In–Li) - Id: `phase:in-li:liquid`; status `assigned` - Structure: liquid; type `st:liquid`; liquid; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 429.75–2500 K, x(Li) 0–1 - Literature: 17 values (16 accepted) from 1 papers - Interactive: [phase registry entry](https://orchid-project.org/phases/#phase:in-li:liquid) Names (5): _corpus: _corpus:phase:in-li:liquid _paper: _paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:Liquid, paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:liquid _tdb: _tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:LIQUID ### TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written [InLi-20Zho.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-20Zho.tdb): LIQUID, type code %, sha256 `3296b39d521eca35…` ~~~~text 26: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 ! 27: CONST LIQUID:L : IN IN2LI3 LI : ! ~~~~ [InLi-22Gie.tdb](https://orchid-project.org/data/databases/sgte-binary/InLi-22Gie.tdb): LIQUID, type code %, sha256 `ef7f71f31b5a62af…` ~~~~text 35: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 ! 36: CONST LIQUID:L : IN INLI LI : ! ~~~~ Example references (6 of 6; assessments first): - [doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G](https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB210205041G) W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). _assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779) X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). _assessment that models this phase_ - [doi:10.1007/bf02663671](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663671) J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671 _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1139/v76-150](https://doi.org/10.1139/v76-150) W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1002/zaac.19562860302](https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19562860302) A. Schneider, O. Hilmer, Wärmeinhalte und Schmelzentropien von NaTl‐Phasen, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 286, 97-117 (1956). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ - [doi:10.1002/zaac.19703760107](https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703760107) Renate Thümmel, Wilhelm Klemm, Das Verhalten der Alkalimetalle zu den Metallen der Gruppe III B, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 376, 44-63 (1970). _cited as the source of values for this phase_ ## Please cite - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970 - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065 Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes. ```bibtex @misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } @misc{orchid_data_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } ``` --- Derived data CC BY 4.0 ([licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)): cite the ORCHID phase registry and the sources named on the page (TDB assessments, Hallstedt 2025, Materials Project, OQMD). TDB statements are quoted as written; parameter expressions are not reproduced. Field reference: [SCHEMA.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/phases/SCHEMA.md). Machine-readable guide: [llms.txt](https://data.orchid-project.org/llms.txt).