Lu–Pb phases

10 phases (tier A 4, tier C 2, liquid 2, needs_review 2); 8 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Lu–Pb system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Lu–Pb system (10)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
ASSOCI phase:lu-pb:associ	liquid	liquid	not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)	0	1
BCC_A2 phase:lu-pb:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
FCC_A1 phase:lu-pb:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.36 K, x(Pb) 1–1	2	2
HCP_A3 phase:lu-pb:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1983.38 K, x(Pb) 0–0.01182	4	2
LIQUID phase:lu-pb:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 595.96–2500 K, x(Pb) 0–1	28	2
LU5PB3_D88 phase:lu-pb:lu5pb3-d88	Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1967.22 K, x(Pb) 0.375–0.375	14	2
LU5PB4_HT phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-ht		needs_review	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1747.98–1772.79 K, x(Pb) 0.44444–0.44444	8	2
LU5PB4_LT phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-lt		needs_review	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1749.54 K, x(Pb) 0.44444–0.44444	10	2
LU6PB5 phase:lu-pb:lu6pb5	Si5V6 · oI44 · Ibam (72)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1445.91 K, x(Pb) 0.45455–0.45455	8	2
LUPB2 phase:lu-pb:lupb2	CuZr2 · tI6 · I4/mmm (139)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–845.22 K, x(Pb) 0.66667–0.66667	8	2

ASSOCI (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:associ; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 1 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:associ
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:ASSOCI

TDB models of ASSOCI (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: ASSOCI, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

35: PHASE ASSOCI:L % 1 1 !
36: CONST ASSOCI:L : LU LU5PB3 PB : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase

BCC_A2 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Pb 1.0000
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:bcc-a2
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

45: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
46: CONST BCC_A2 : PB : VA : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

40: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
41: CONST BCC_A2 : PB : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase

FCC_A1 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.36 K, x(Pb) 1–1
Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:fcc-a1
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:(Pb)
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

40: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
41: CONST FCC_A1 : PB : VA : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

35: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
36: CONST FCC_A1 : LU PB% : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

HCP_A3 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1983.38 K, x(Pb) 0–0.01182
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:hcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:(Lu), paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:(Lu)
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

50: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
51: CONST HCP_A3 : LU% PB : VA : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

45: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
46: CONST HCP_A3 : LU% PB : VA : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LIQUID (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 595.96–2500 K, x(Pb) 0–1
Literature: 28 values (28 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:liquid
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:Liq, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:L
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

32: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
33: CONST LIQUID:L : LU PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

30: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
31: CONST LIQUID:L : LU PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LU5PB3_D88 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:lu5pb3-d88; status assigned
Structure: Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193); type st:d8-8-mn5si3-hp16; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: DFT agrees: on-hull mp-aaackxxn and oqmd-30697, space group 193
Stoichiometry: Lu 0.6250, Pb 0.3750
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1967.22 K, x(Pb) 0.375–0.375
Literature: 14 values (14 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (7): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:lu5pb3-d88
mp: mp:mp-aaackxxn
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-30697
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:Lu5Pb3, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:Lu5Pb3
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LU5PB3_D88, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LU5PB3_D88

TDB models of LU5PB3_D88 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LU5PB3_D88, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

55: PHASE LU5PB3_D88 % 2 5 3 !
56: CONST LU5PB3_D88 : LU : PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LU5PB3_D88, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

50: PHASE LU5PB3_D88 % 2 5 3 !
51: CONST LU5PB3_D88 : LU : PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LU5PB4_HT (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-ht; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; polymorph_family:other phases of this system have the same composition
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Lu5Pb4-ht) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for LU5PB4_HT: Lu5Pb4-ht
Stoichiometry: Lu 0.5556, Pb 0.4444
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1747.98–1772.79 K, x(Pb) 0.44444–0.44444
Literature: 8 values (8 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-ht
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:βLu5Pb4, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:βLu5Pb4
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LU5PB4_HT, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LU5PB4_HT

TDB models of LU5PB4_HT (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LU5PB4_HT, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

65: PHASE LU5PB4_HT % 2 5 4 !
66: CONST LU5PB4_HT : LU : PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LU5PB4_HT, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

60: PHASE LU5PB4_HT % 2 5 4 !
61: CONST LU5PB4_HT : LU : PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LU5PB4_LT (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-lt; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; polymorph_family:other phases of this system have the same composition
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Lu5Pb4-lt) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for LU5PB4_LT: Lu5Pb5-lt
Stoichiometry: Lu 0.5556, Pb 0.4444
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1749.54 K, x(Pb) 0.44444–0.44444
Literature: 10 values (10 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:lu5pb4-lt
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:αLu5Pb4, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:αLu5Pb4
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LU5PB4_LT, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LU5PB4_LT

TDB models of LU5PB4_LT (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LU5PB4_LT, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

60: PHASE LU5PB4_LT % 2 5 4 !
61: CONST LU5PB4_LT : LU : PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LU5PB4_LT, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

55: PHASE LU5PB4_LT % 2 5 4 !
56: CONST LU5PB4_LT : LU : PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LU6PB5 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:lu6pb5; status assigned
Structure: Si5V6 · oI44 · Ibam (72); type st:si5v6-oi44; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_oqmd, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Lu 0.5455, Pb 0.4545
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1445.91 K, x(Pb) 0.45455–0.45455
Literature: 8 values (8 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:lu6pb5
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:Lu6Pb5, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:Lu6Pb5
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LU6PB5, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LU6PB5

TDB models of LU6PB5 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LU6PB5, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

70: PHASE LU6PB5 % 2 6 5 !
71: CONST LU6PB5 : LU : PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LU6PB5, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

65: PHASE LU6PB5 % 2 6 5 !
66: CONST LU6PB5 : LU : PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LUPB2 (Lu–Pb)

Id: phase:lu-pb:lupb2; status assigned
Structure: CuZr2 · tI6 · I4/mmm (139); type st:cuzr2-ti6; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_mp, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: Lu 0.3333, Pb 0.6667
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–845.22 K, x(Pb) 0.66667–0.66667
Literature: 8 values (8 accepted) from 2 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:lu-pb:lupb2
paper: paper:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2:LuPb2, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007:LuPb2
tdb: tdb:LuPb-12Idd.tdb:LUPB2, tdb:LuPb-13Wan.tdb:LUPB2

TDB models of LUPB2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

LuPb-12Idd.tdb: LUPB2, type code %, sha256 33e63b676c5f908f…

75: PHASE LUPB2 % 2 1 2 !
76: CONST LUPB2 : LU : PB : !

LuPb-13Wan.tdb: LUPB2, type code %, sha256 602dc6f7866693ae…

70: PHASE LUPB2 % 2 1 2 !
71: CONST LUPB2 : LU : PB : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1881-2 A. Iddaoudi, N. Selhaoui, M. Ait Amar, K. Mahdouk, A. Aharoune, L. Bouirden, Thermodynamic description of the Lu–Pb binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 110, 923-928 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.007 D. Wang, Y. Yu, X.J. Liu, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Eu–Pb and Lu–Pb systems, Calphad 41, 20-25 (2013).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/0022-5088(69)90179-9 O.D. McMasters, K.A. Gschneidner, The lutetium-lead system, Journal of the Less Common Metals 19, 337-344 (1969).
cited as the source of values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}