Sb–Sm phases
12 phases (tier A 8, tier C 2, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 11 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).
Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Sb–Sm system page · Markdown · field reference
| Phase | Structure | Basis | Stability (calculated) | Literature values | TDB models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 phase:sb-sm:a7-rhombohedral | alpha-As · A7 · hR2 · R-3m (166) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–910.18 K, x(Sm) 0–0 | 3 | 2 |
| BCC_A2 phase:sb-sm:bcc-a2 | W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1150.15–2500 K, x(Sm) 0.98723–1 | 5 | 2 |
| FCC_A1 phase:sb-sm:fcc-a1 | Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225) | tier A: standard phase name | not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s) | 0 | 2 |
| HCP_A3 phase:sb-sm:hcp-a3 | Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1006.99–1340 K, x(Sm) 1–1 | 2 | 2 |
| LIQUID phase:sb-sm:liquid | liquid | liquid | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 875.18–2500 K, x(Sm) 0–1 | 18 | 2 |
| RHOMB_C19 phase:sb-sm:rhomb-c19 | CdCl2 · C19 · hR3 · R-3m (166) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1191.99 K, x(Sm) 1–1 | 0 | 2 |
| SB2SM phase:sb-sm:sb2sm | Sb2Sm · oC24 · Cmce (64) | tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table) | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1645.56 K, x(Sm) 0.33333–0.33333 | 6 | 2 |
| SB3SM4_D73 phase:sb-sm:sb3sm4-d73 | Th3P4 · D7_3 · cI28 · I-43d (220) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2062.7 K, x(Sm) 0.57143–0.57143 | 8 | 2 |
| SB3SM5_HT phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5 | needs_review | stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1293.33 K, x(Sm) 0.625–0.625 | 5 | 1 | |
| SB3SM5_D88 phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5-d88 | Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2003.33 K, x(Sm) 0.625–0.625 | 7 | 2 |
| SBSM_B1 phase:sb-sm:sbsm-b1 | NaCl · B1 · cF8 · Fm-3m (225) | tier A: standard phase name | stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2200.92 K, x(Sm) 0.5–0.5 | 9 | 2 |
| SBSM2 phase:sb-sm:sbsm2 | La2Sb · tI12 · I4/mmm (139) | tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table) | stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1600.63 K, x(Sm) 0.66667–0.66667 | 0 | 1 |
RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:a7-rhombohedral; statusassigned - Structure: alpha-As · A7 · hR2 · R-3m (166); type
st:a7-alpha-as-hr2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sb 1.0000
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–910.18 K, x(Sm) 0–0
- Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:a7-rhombohedral, corpus:phase:sb-sm:rhombohedral-a7
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:(Sb)
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7
TDB models of RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
48: PHASE RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 % 1 1 ! 49: CONST RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 : SB : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
42: PHASE RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 % 1 1 ! 43: CONST RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 : SB : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
BCC_A2 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:bcc-a2; statusassigned - Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type
st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1150.15–2500 K, x(Sm) 0.98723–1
- Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:bcc-a2
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:(γSm)
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:BCC_A2
TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
38: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 ! 39: CONST BCC_A2 : SB SM : VA : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
32: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 ! 33: CONST BCC_A2 : SB SM : VA : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
FCC_A1 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:fcc-a1; statusassigned - Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type
st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sb 1.0000
- Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
- Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:FCC_A1
TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
33: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 ! 34: CONST FCC_A1 : SB : VA : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
27: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 ! 28: CONST FCC_A1 : SB : VA : !
Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase
HCP_A3 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:hcp-a3; statusassigned - Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type
st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 1006.99–1340 K, x(Sm) 1–1
- Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:hcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:(βSm)
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:HCP_A3
TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
43: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 ! 44: CONST HCP_A3 : SB SM : VA : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
37: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 ! 38: CONST HCP_A3 : SB SM : VA : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
LIQUID (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:liquid; statusassigned - Structure: liquid; type
st:liquid; liquid; confidence high - Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 875.18–2500 K, x(Sm) 0–1
- Literature: 18 values (18 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:liquid
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:L
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:LIQUID
TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
28: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 ! 29: CONST LIQUID:L : SB SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
22: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 ! 23: CONST LIQUID:L : SB SM : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
RHOMB_C19 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:rhomb-c19; statusassigned - Structure: CdCl2 · C19 · hR3 · R-3m (166); type
st:c19-cdcl2-hr3; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sm 1.0000
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1191.99 K, x(Sm) 1–1
- Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:rhomb-c19
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:RHOMB_C19, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:RHOMB_C19
TDB models of RHOMB_C19 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: RHOMB_C19, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
53: PHASE RHOMB_C19 % 1 1 ! 54: CONST RHOMB_C19 : SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: RHOMB_C19, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
47: PHASE RHOMB_C19 % 1 1 ! 48: CONST RHOMB_C19 : SM : !
Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase
SB2SM (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sb2sm; statusassigned - Structure: Sb2Sm · oC24 · Cmce (64); type
st:sb2sm-oc24; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated - Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
- Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_mp, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
- Stoichiometry: Sb 0.6667, Sm 0.3333
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–1645.56 K, x(Sm) 0.33333–0.33333
- Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sb2sm
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:Sb2Sm
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:SB2SM, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:SB2SM
TDB models of SB2SM (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: SB2SM, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
58: PHASE SB2SM % 2 2 1 ! 59: CONST SB2SM : SB : SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: SB2SM, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
52: PHASE SB2SM % 2 2 1 ! 53: CONST SB2SM : SB : SM : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
SB3SM4_D73 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sb3sm4-d73; statusassigned - Structure: Th3P4 · D7_3 · cI28 · I-43d (220); type
st:d7-3-th3p4-ci28; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sb 0.4286, Sm 0.5714
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2062.7 K, x(Sm) 0.57143–0.57143
- Literature: 8 values (8 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sb3sm4-d73
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:Sb3Sm4
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:SB3SM4_D73, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:SB3SM4_D73
TDB models of SB3SM4_D73 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: SB3SM4_D73, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
68: PHASE SB3SM4_D73 % 2 3 4 ! 69: CONST SB3SM4_D73 : SB : SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: SB3SM4_D73, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
62: PHASE SB3SM4_D73 % 2 3 4 ! 63: CONST SB3SM4_D73 : SB : SM : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
SB3SM5_HT (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5; statusneeds_review - No structure assigned. Why: no_structure_token; polymorph_family:other phases of this system have the same composition; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete
- Candidate (dft_mp): P6_3/mcm (193) — on-hull MP Sm5Sb3 at x(SM)=0.6250
- Candidate (dft_oqmd): P63/mcm (193) — on-hull OQMD Sb3 Sm5 at x(SM)=0.6250
- Candidate (literature_printed): (Sb3Sm5-ht) · ? — printed with a label mapped to this phase
- Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (Sb3Sm5-ht) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for SB3SM5_HT: Sb3Sm5
- Stoichiometry: Sb 0.3750, Sm 0.6250
- Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1293.33 K, x(Sm) 0.625–0.625
- Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5, corpus:phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5-ht
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:βSb3Sm5
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:SB3SM5_HT
TDB models of SB3SM5_HT (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: SB3SM5_HT, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
78: PHASE SB3SM5_HT % 2 3 5 ! 79: CONST SB3SM5_HT : SB : SM : !
Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
SB3SM5_D88 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5-d88; statusassigned - Structure: Mn5Si3 · D8_8 · hP16 · P6_3/mcm (193); type
st:d8-8-mn5si3-hp16; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sb 0.3750, Sm 0.6250
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2003.33 K, x(Sm) 0.625–0.625
- Literature: 7 values (7 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sb3sm5-d88
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:Sb3Sm5, paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:αSb3Sm5
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:SB3SM5_D88, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:SB3SM5_D88
TDB models of SB3SM5_D88 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: SB3SM5_D88, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
73: PHASE SB3SM5_D88 % 2 3 5 ! 74: CONST SB3SM5_D88 : SB : SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: SB3SM5_D88, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
67: PHASE SB3SM5_D88 % 2 3 5 ! 68: CONST SB3SM5_D88 : SB : SM : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
SBSM_B1 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sbsm-b1; statusassigned - Structure: NaCl · B1 · cF8 · Fm-3m (225); type
st:b1-nacl-cf8; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high - Stoichiometry: Sb 0.5000, Sm 0.5000
- Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–2200.92 K, x(Sm) 0.5–0.5
- Literature: 9 values (9 accepted) from 1 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sbsm-b1
paper: paper:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002:SbSm
tdb: tdb:SbSm-14Liu.tdb:SBSM_B1, tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:SBSM_B1
TDB models of SBSM_B1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-14Liu.tdb: SBSM_B1, type code %, sha256 7316b4d1e5af1aa8…
63: PHASE SBSM_B1 % 2 1 1 ! 64: CONST SBSM_B1 : SB : SM : !
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: SBSM_B1, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
57: PHASE SBSM_B1 % 2 1 1 ! 58: CONST SBSM_B1 : SB : SM : !
Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):
- doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002 X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase - doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase - doi:10.1016/0022-5088(88)90149-x F.M. Sadigov, N.S. Shahguliyev, O.M. Aliyev, The samarium-antimony phase diagram, Journal of the Less Common Metals 144, L5-L8 (1988).
cited as the source of values for this phase
SBSM2 (Sb–Sm)
- Id:
phase:sb-sm:sbsm2; statusassigned - Structure: La2Sb · tI12 · I4/mmm (139); type
st:la2sb-ti12; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated - Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
- Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_on_hull_entry_in_both, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
- Stoichiometry: Sb 0.3333, Sm 0.6667
- Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–1600.63 K, x(Sm) 0.66667–0.66667
- Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
- Interactive: phase registry entry
Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:sb-sm:sbsm2
tdb: tdb:SbSm-96Cac.tdb:SBSM2
TDB models of SBSM2 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written
SbSm-96Cac.tdb: SBSM2, type code %, sha256 eb704a9b7603a516…
72: PHASE SBSM2 % 2 1 2 ! 73: CONST SBSM2 : SB : SM : !
Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):
- doi:10.1515/ijmr-1996-870708 G. Cacciamani, G. Borzone, N. Parodi, R. Ferro, Z. Metallkd., 87, 562-67(1996).
assessment that models this phase