Ag–Au–Pb system

9 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 6, model 3); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental6
model3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction9

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Au–Pb system (9)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
524.5quasi-peritectic: L + Au2Pb = α + AuPb2L: Au 0.2597, Pb 0.7367model[1] Hassam 2010Table 4, p. 7, row 3
report
522quasi-peritectic: L + Au2Pb = α + AuPb2L: Au 0.261, Pb 0.7337experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Hassam 1995 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 2
report
493.7quasi-peritectic: L + AuPb2 = α + AuPb3L: Au 0.1739, Pb 0.8218model[1] Hassam 2010Table 4, p. 7, row 6
report
491quasi-peritectic: L + AuPb2 = α + AuPb3L: Au 0.1861, Pb 0.8091experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Hassam 1995 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 5
report
491quasi-peritectic: L + Au2Pb = α + AuPb2experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Bros 1989 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 1
report
487quasi-peritectic: L + AuPb2 = α + AuPb3experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Bros 1989 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 4
report
486.2eutectic: L = (Pb) + α + AuPb3L: Au 0.1519, Pb 0.8436model[1] Hassam 2010Table 4, p. 7, row 9
report
485eutectic: L = (Pb) + α + AuPb3L: Au 0.1696, Pb 0.8253experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Hassam 1995 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 8
report
482.5eutectic: L = (Pb) + α + AuPb3experimental[1] Hassam 2010
cites Bros 1989 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 7
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Hassam, D. Boa, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, Critical assessment and optimization of the Ag–Au–Pb system, Thermochimica Acta 510, 37-45 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.06.020