Ag–Bi–Sn system

17 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 3, model 14); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	3
model	14

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	17

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Bi–Sn system (17)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
995.45	peritectic: p1: L+(Ag) -> ξAg		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 1 report
749.65	peritectic: p2: L+ξAg -> Ag3Sn		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 2 report
536.45	quasi-peritectic: L + (Ag) -> ξAg + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.0333, Bi 0.9567, Sn 0.01	experimental	[1] Li 2008 cites Hassam 1998 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report
535.75	quasi-peritectic: U1: L+(Ag) -> ξAg+(Bi)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 3 report
535.75	quasi-peritectic: L + (Ag) -> ξAg + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.0375, Bi 0.9541, Sn 0.0085	model	[1] Li 2008	Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report
535.25	quasi-peritectic: L + ξAg -> Ag3Sn + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.0354, Bi 0.9513, Sn 0.0133	model	[1] Li 2008	Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report
535.25	quasi-peritectic: U2: L+ξAg -> Ag3Sn+(Bi)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 4 report
535.15	L +(Ag)->(ζAg)+(Bi)	L: Ag 0.035, Bi 0.9517, Sn 0.0133; (Ag): Ag 0.8987, Bi 0.0031, Sn 0.0982; (ζAg): Ag 0.8821, Bi 0, Sn 0.1179; (Bi): Ag 0, Bi 0.9993, Sn 7.000e-4; Liquid: Ag 0.035, Bi 0.9517, Sn 0.0133	model	[2] Kattner 1994	Table III, p. 4, row 1 report
534.95	quasi-peritectic: L + ξAg -> Ag3Sn + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.0233, Bi 0.9467, Sn 0.03	experimental	[1] Li 2008 cites Hassam 1998 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report
534.75	eutectic: e1: L -> (Ag)+(Bi)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 5 report
511.75	L+(ζAg)->Ag3Sn+(Bi)	L: Ag 0.0261, Bi 0.8396, Sn 0.1343; (ζAg): Ag 0.8153, Bi 0, Sn 0.1847; Ag3Sn: Ag 0.75, Bi 0, Sn 0.25; (Bi): Ag 0, Bi 0.9935, Sn 0.0065; Liquid: Ag 0.0261, Bi 0.8396, Sn 0.1343	model	[2] Kattner 1994	Table III, p. 4, row 2 report
493.65	eutectic: e2: L -> Ag3Sn+(Sn)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 6 report
415.35	eutectic: e3: L -> (Bi)+(Sn)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 7 report
414.35	eutectic: L -> Ag3Sn + (Sn) + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.0064, Bi 0.4121, Sn 0.5815	model	[1] Li 2008	Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report
414.35	eutectic: E: L -> Ag3Sn+(Bi)+(Sn)		model	[1] Li 2008	Table 3, p. 11, row 8 report
411.55	eutectic: L -> Ag3Sn + (Sn) + (Bi)	L: Ag 0.015, Bi 0.4214, Sn 0.5636	experimental	[1] Li 2008 cites Hassam 1998 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report
409.65	L->Ag3Sn+(Sn) +(Bi)	L: Ag 0.0108, Bi 0.4169, Sn 0.5723; Ag3Sn: Ag 0.75, Bi 0, Sn 0.25; (Sn): Ag 5.000e-4, Bi 0.1305, Sn 0.869; (Bi): Ag 0, Bi 0.9889, Sn 0.0111; Liquid: Ag 0.0108, Bi 0.4169, Sn 0.5723	model	[2] Kattner 1994	Table III, p. 4, row 3 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Zuoan Li, Zhanmin Cao, Sabine Knott, Adolf Mikula, Yong Du, Zhiyu Qiao, Thermodynamic investigation of the Ag–Bi–Sn ternary system, Calphad 32, 152-163 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2007.07.008
Ursula r Kattner, William J. Boettinger, On the Sn-Bi-Ag ternary phase diagram, J. Electron. Mater. 23, 603-610 (1994). doi:10.1007/bf02653345

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}