Ag–Cu–Nb system

12 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	12

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase equilibrium	12

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (12)

Phase equilibrium, Ag–Cu–Nb system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	773.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.9003, Cu 0.0912, Nb 0.0085; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0446, Cu 0.8913, Nb 0.0641	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report
Phase composition	773.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.9044, Cu 0.0894, Nb 0.0062; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0458, Cu 0.8877, Nb 0.0665; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0115, Cu 0.0213, Nb 0.9672	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Phase composition	773.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.9433, Cu 0.0463, Nb 0.0104; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0432, Cu 0.894, Nb 0.0628	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report
Phase composition	773.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8778, Cu 0.1185, Nb 0.0037; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0268, Cu 0.9327, Nb 0.0405; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0076, Cu 0.0144, Nb 0.978	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Phase composition	873.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.905, Cu 0.0919, Nb 0.0031; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0191, Cu 0.9777, Nb 0.0032; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0049, Cu 0.0548, Nb 0.9403	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Phase composition	873.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.9003, Cu 0.0946, Nb 0.0051; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0213, Cu 0.9743, Nb 0.0044; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0022, Cu 0.0099, Nb 0.9879	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
Phase composition	873.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.9156, Cu 0.0799, Nb 0.0045; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0221, Cu 0.9759, Nb 0.002	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
Phase composition	873.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8942, Cu 0.1018, Nb 0.004; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0197, Cu 0.9783, Nb 0.002; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.005, Cu 0.0239, Nb 0.9711	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Phase composition	973.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8855, Cu 0.1037, Nb 0.0108; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0231, Cu 0.9729, Nb 0.004	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Phase composition	973.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8846, Cu 0.1128, Nb 0.0026; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0353, Cu 0.9607, Nb 0.004; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0051, Cu 0.0521, Nb 0.9428	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Phase composition	973.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8872, Cu 0.1083, Nb 0.0045; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0347, Cu 0.9626, Nb 0.0027	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Phase composition	973.15	fcc(Ag) + fcc(Cu) + bcc(Nb) fcc(Ag): Ag 0.8817, Cu 0.1144, Nb 0.0039; fcc(Cu): Ag 0.0262, Cu 0.9666, Nb 0.0072; bcc(Nb): Ag 0.0034, Cu 0.0607, Nb 0.9359	experimental	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Yu Zhang, Biao Hu, Huiqing Yin, Shuhong Liu, Yong Du, Phase Equilibria of the Ag–Cu–M (M = Nb, Fe, Pb) Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43, 533-546 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00998-x

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}