Ag–Dy–Sb system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (model 23); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
model	23

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	23

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Dy–Sb system (23)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Class	Source	Location
2002.8	peritectic: L + α_DySb -> β_Dy4Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 19 report
2002.8	quasi-peritectic: L + α_DySb -> β_Dy4Sb3 + L	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report
1917.8	quasi-peritectic: L + β_Dy4Sb3 -> L + Dy5Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report
1917.8	peritectic: L + β_Dy4Sb3 -> Dy5Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 20 report
1903	quasi-peritectic: L + β_Dy4Sb3 -> Dy5Sb3 + α_Dy4Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report
1903	peritectic: L + β_Dy4Sb3 + α_DySb -> α_Dy4Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 21 report
1851	quasi-peritectic: L + Dy5Sb3 -> τ1 + α_Dy4Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report
1830.6	quasi-peritectic: L + Dy5Sb3 -> τ1 + L	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report
1830.6	peritectic: L + Dy5Sb3 -> τ1	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 22 report
1752.4	quasi-peritectic: L + α_Dy4Sb3 -> τ1 + α_DySb	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report
1630.1	quasi-peritectic: L + τ1 -> L + Dy5Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report
1630.1	peritectic: L + τ1 -> Dy5Sb3	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 23 report
1372.4	quasi-peritectic: L + Dy5Sb3 -> τ1 + Hcp(Dy)	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
1245	quasi-peritectic: L + α_DySb -> τ1 + Ag2Dy	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 13 report
1222.5	eutectic: L -> τ1 + Ag2Dy + AgDy	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report
1182.1	eutectic: L -> α_DySb + Ag2Dy + Ag51Dy14	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
1171.2	quasi-peritectic: L + τ1 -> AgDy + Hcp(Dy)	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 14 report
1074.8	eutectic: L -> α_DySb + Ag51Dy14 + Fcc(Ag)	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 3 report
974.4	quasi-peritectic: L + Fcc(Ag) -> α_DySb + Hcp(Dy)	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report
835.5	quasi-peritectic: L + Hcp(Dy) -> α_DySb + ε	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 16 report
831	quasi-peritectic: L + α_DySb -> τ2 + Rho	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 17 report
818.1	quasi-peritectic: L + α_DySb -> τ2 + ε	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 18 report
753.2	eutectic: L -> τ2 + Rho + ε	model	[1] Long 2010	Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Z.H. Long, S.X. Zhou, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Dy–Sb ternary system, Thermochimica Acta 498, 22-26 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2009.09.006

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}