Ag–Pu system

22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction21
phase transition1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AgPu-20Zho.tdbJ. Zhou, B. Hu, Y. Jiang, C. Qiu, Y. Du, H. Yin, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 41, 257-68(2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00813-53a0aa8760514e86a3258ad522d4f103f936212a84d58afa4b224a040b9981db7viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AgPu-20Zho.tdb1092.7AG51PU14 (x(Pu) 0.21538) + AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pu) 0.38062)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb1067.07AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pu) 0.44526) + LIQUID#2 (x(Pu) 0.99376)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb1061.15FCC_A1 (x(Pu) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pu) 0.08684) + AG51PU14 (x(Pu) 0.21538)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb1061.15FCC_A1 (x(Pu) 0) + LIQUID (x(Pu) 0.08683) + AG51PU14 (x(Pu) 0.21538)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb909.75AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Pu) 0.99862) + BCC_A2 (x(Pu) 1)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb755.67AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Pu) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Pu) 1)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb736.42AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Pu) 1) + FCC_A1 (x(Pu) 1)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb593.06AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + GAMMA_PU (x(Pu) 1) + FCC_A1 (x(Pu) 1)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb487.9AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + GAMMA_PU (x(Pu) 1) + BETA_PU (x(Pu) 1)
AgPu-20Zho.tdb397.62AG2PU (x(Pu) 0.33333) + ALPHA_PU (x(Pu) 1) + BETA_PU (x(Pu) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Pu system (21)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1253.15congruent melting: Liquid#1 -> Ag51Pu14Liquid#1: Pu 0.2154; Ag51Pu14: Ag 0.784615, Pu 0.215385model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 19
report
1250.15congruent melting: Liquid#1 -> Ag51Pu14Liquid#1: Pu 0.2155; Ag51Pu14: Ag 0.784615, Pu 0.215385experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 20
report
1090.15peritecticexperimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
p. 5
report
Later, Wood et al.[46] reported two stoichiometric compounds, i.e. Ag51Pu14 (melting point 977 C) and Ag2Pu (peritectic formation at 817 C) based on a combination of XRD, thermal analysis and microscope methods.
1090.15peritectic: Liquid#2 + Ag51Pu14 -> Ag2PuAg51Pu14: Pu 0.2155; Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 4
report
1090.15peritectic: Liquid#2 + Ag51Pu14 -> Ag2PuLiquid#2: Pu 0.3836; Ag51Pu14: Pu 0.2154; Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 3
report
1074.15eutectic: Liquid#1 -> (Ag) + Ag51Pu14Liquid#1: Pu 0.092; Ag51Pu14: Pu 0.2155experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 2
report
1068.15monotectic: Liquid#1 -> Liquid#2 + Ag2PuLiquid#1: Pu 0.41; Liquid#2: Pu 0.98; Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313; Liquid# 2: Pu 0.98experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 6
report
1066.15monotectic: Liquid#1 -> Liquid#2 + Ag2PuLiquid#1: Pu 0.4451; Liquid#2: Pu 0.9938; Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; Liquid# 2: Pu 0.9938model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 5
report
1062.15eutectic: Liquid#1 -> (Ag) + Ag51Pu14Liquid#1: Pu 0.0863; (Ag): Pu 0; Ag51Pu14: Pu 0.2154model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 1
report
932.15peritectic: Liquid#2 + Ag2Pu -> (εPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 8
report
932.15peritectic: Liquid#2 + Ag2Pu -> (εPu)Liquid#2: Pu 0.9983; Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (εPu): Pu 0.9903model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 7
report
756.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (εPu) -> (δ'Pu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 10
report
749.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (εPu) -> (δ'Pu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (εPu): Pu 0.9976; (δ'Pu): Pu 1model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 9
report
736.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (δ'Pu) -> (δPu)Ag2Pu: Ag 0.666667, Pu 0.333333experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 12
report
736.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (δ'Pu) -> (δPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (δ'Pu): Pu 1model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 11
report
595.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (δPu) -> (γPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (δPu): Pu 0.9994; (γPu): Pu 1model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 13
report
593.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (δPu) -> (γPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 14
report
488.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (γPu) -> (βPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (γPu): Pu 0.9999; (βPu): Pu 0.9999model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 15
report
488.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (γPu) -> (βPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 16
report
398.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (βPu) -> (αPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.313experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
Table 8, p. 11, row 18
report
398.15peritectoid: Ag2Pu + (βPu) -> (αPu)Ag2Pu: Pu 0.3333; (βPu): Pu 0.9998; (αPu): Pu 1model[1] Zhou 2020Table 8, p. 11, row 17
report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, Ag–Pu system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1250.15 K1250.15Ag51Pu14experimental[1] Zhou 2020
cites Wood 1970 doi
p. 5
report
Later, Wood et al.[46] reported two stoichiometric compounds, i.e. Ag51Pu14 (melting point 977 C) and Ag2Pu (peritectic formation at 817 C) based on a combination of XRD, thermal analysis and microscope methods.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Jiaqiang Zhou, Biao Hu, Yu Jiang, Chengliang Qiu, Yong Du, Huiqin Yin, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ag-X (X = B, Fe, Sm, Pu) Binary Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 41, 257-268 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00813-5