Ag–Ti system

71 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 26, model 14, unspecified 31); 4 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (6) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	26
model	14
unspecified	31

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	35
phase equilibrium	7
crystal structure	29

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	R. Arroyave, PhD Thesis, MIT, 2004.	`a954cc84f5226307c3aa58c238ade54dd6ae59f149e0d98fb778baf35353e595`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AgTi-05Li.tdb	M. Li, C. Li, F. Wang, W. Zhang, Calphad, 29, 269-75(2005). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.09.002	`794cf6fa270dac1a9406eb12800bc684e4b482c65466b97a9996dd47e9916946`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	W. Gierlotka, A. Debski, W. Gasior, M. Polanski, Comput. Mater. Sci., 230, 112519(2023). doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112519	`563e78d8083b3c21a22f07bdb910162d746b75820f9fd8cfd1fbe136bc33730c`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	P.J. Spencer, unpublished work, 1998.	`9edb83ec276622eb91055d1d085af65c5db7e89d9e61ebdf853fe3920afc61e7`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	1297.11	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.08892) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.49776) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.83654)
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	1231.78	FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0.05716) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.06133) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.49158)
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	1216.16	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.50278) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88416)
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	1216.16	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.50278) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88422)
AgTi-04Arr.tdb	1125.89	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93391) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.95797)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1293.15	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.0604) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.50167) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.83461)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1233.48	FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0.03756) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.04126) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.49324)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1213.16	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.51) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88578)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1213.16	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.51002) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88586)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1126.89	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.92551) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.93246)
AgTi-05Li.tdb	1126.89	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.92593) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.93289)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1294.84	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.05858) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.84524)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1294.84	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.05863) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.84521)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1236.2	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.0393) + FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0.04298) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1211.82	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.89081)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1211.82	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.89084)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1126.85	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93365) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.94624)
AgTi-23Gie.tdb	1126.85	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.93399) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.94653)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1287.81	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.079) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.82203)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1287.81	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.07905) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.82199)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1232.96	FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0.054) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.05735) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1232.96	FCC_A1 (x(Ti) 0.05358) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.05688) + AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1200.48	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88863)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1200.48	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88877)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1200.48	AGTI_B11 (x(Ti) 0.5) + AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.88858)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1127.56	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.92871) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.94124)
AgTi-98Spe-LB.tdb	1127.56	AGTI2 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.92911) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.94156)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AgTi-04Arr · CALPHAD hull AgTi-05Li · CALPHAD hull AgTi-98Spe-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Ti system (35)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location	Quote
1311	(β-Ti) + L = AgTi	(β-Ti): Ti 0.163; AgTi: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Adenstedt 1953 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
1297	L + (β Ti) = AgTi	L: Ti 0.085; (β Ti): Ti 0.836; AgTi: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Arroyave 2004	Table 5, p. 5, row 3 report
1294.8	L + (β Ti) = AgTi	L: Ti 0.058; (β Ti): Ti 0.845; AgTi: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 5, p. 5, row 1 report
1293	peritectic: L -> (Ag) + (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.0116; (Ag): Ti 0.0465; (AgTi): Ti 0.52	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites McQuillan 1960	Table 3, p. 4, row 3 report
1293	peritectic: L + β(Ti) -> (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.06; β(Ti): Ti 0.847; (AgTi): Ti 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Eremenko 1969	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
1293	(β-Ti) + L = AgTi	L: Ti 0.94; AgTi: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Eremenko 1969 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report
1293	peritectic: L + β(Ti) -> (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.06; β(Ti): Ti 0.835; (AgTi): Ti 0.501	model	[2] Li 2005	Table 3, p. 4, row 4 report
1290	peritectic		experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites McQuillan 1960	p. 5 report	The type of the invariant reaction involving (Ag), liquid and (AgTi) was questionable. McQuillan [9] reported that the reaction is of peritectic type and occurs at 1290 K.
1290	peritectic: L + β(Ti) -> (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.1; β(Ti): Ti 0.85; (AgTi): Ti 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites McQuillan 1960	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
1290	(β-Ti) + L = AgTi	(β-Ti): Ti 0.15; L: Ti 0.9; AgTi: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites McQuilian 1960	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
1289	L + (β Ti) = AgTi	L: Ti 0.059; (β Ti): Ti 0.835; AgTi: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Li 2005 doi	Table 5, p. 5, row 2 report
1273	(β-Ti) + L = AgTi	AgTi: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Deccecco 1953	Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report
1237	L + AgTi = (Ag)	L: Ti 0.042; AgTi: Ti 0.5; (Ag): Ti 0.047	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Li 2005 doi	Table 5, p. 5, row 11 report
1235	L + AgTi = (Ag)	L: Ti 0.039; AgTi: Ti 0.5; (Ag): Ti 0.043	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 5, p. 5, row 10 report
1233	eutectic: L -> (Ag) + (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.0413; (Ag): Ti 0.0376; (AgTi): Ti 0.493	model	[2] Li 2005	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
1232	L = AgTi + (Ag)	L: Ti 0.95; AgTi: Ti 0.5; (Ag): Ti 0.95	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Murray 1983 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
1232	eutectic: L -> (Ag) + (AgTi)	L: Ti 0.05; (Ag): Ti 0.05; (AgTi): Ti 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Eremenko 1969	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report
1232	L = (Ag) + AgTi	L: Ti 0.061; (Ag): Ti 0.057; AgTi: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Arroyave 2004	Table 5, p. 5, row 12 report
1218	(β-Ti) + AgTi = AgTi2	AgTi: Ti 0.5; AgTi2: Ti 0.66	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Eremenko 1969 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
1218	peritectoid: β(Ti) + (AgTi) -> AgTi2	β(Ti): Ti 0.872; (AgTi): Ti 0.51; AgTi2: Ti 0.667	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Eremenko 1969	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
1216	AgTi + (β Ti) = AgTi2	AgTi: Ti 0.5; (β Ti): Ti 0.885; AgTi2: Ti 0.667	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Arroyave 2004	Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report
1213	(β-Ti) + AgTi = AgTi2	(β-Ti): Ti 0.117; AgTi: Ti 0.5; AgTi2: Ti 0.66	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Plichta 1977	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
1213	peritectoid: β(Ti) + (AgTi) -> AgTi2	β(Ti): Ti 0.886; (AgTi): Ti 0.51; AgTi2: Ti 0.667	model	[2] Li 2005	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
1212	AgTi + (β Ti) = AgTi2	AgTi: Ti 0.5; (β Ti): Ti 0.889; AgTi2: Ti 0.667	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 5, p. 5, row 4 report
1203	(β-Ti) + AgTi = AgTi2	(β-Ti): Ti 0.12; AgTi: Ti 0.5; AgTi2: Ti 0.66	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites McQuilian 1960	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
1203	peritectoid: β(Ti) + (AgTi) -> AgTi2	β(Ti): Ti 0.88; (AgTi): Ti 0.52; AgTi2: Ti 0.667	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites McQuillan 1960	Table 3, p. 4, row 9 report
1173	(β-Ti) + AgTi = AgTi2	(β-Ti): Ti 0.1; AgTi: Ti 0.5; AgTi2: Ti 0.66	experimental	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Adenstedt 1953 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
1133	eutectoid: β(Ti) -> AgTi2 + α(Ti)	β(Ti): Ti 0.924; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; α(Ti): Ti 0.953	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Plichta 1978 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 14 report
1129	(β Ti) = AgTi2 + (α Ti)	(β Ti): Ti 0.924; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; (α Ti): Ti 0.931	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Li 2005 doi	Table 5, p. 5, row 8 report
1128	(β-Ti) = (α-Ti) + AgTi2	(β-Ti): Ti 0.076; (α-Ti): Ti 0.047; AgTi2: Ti 0.66	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Murray 1983 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
1128	eutectoid: β(Ti) -> AgTi2 + α(Ti)	β(Ti): Ti 0.885; AgTi2: Ti 0.72; α(Ti): Ti 0.93	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Worner 1953	Table 3, p. 4, row 11 report
1127	eutectoid: β(Ti) -> AgTi2 + α(Ti)	β(Ti): Ti 0.926; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; α(Ti): Ti 0.933	model	[2] Li 2005	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
1126	(β Ti) = AgTi2 + (α Ti)	(β Ti): Ti 0.933; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; (α Ti): Ti 0.958	model	[1] Gierlotka 2023 cites Arroyave 2004	Table 5, p. 5, row 9 report
1124	eutectoid: β(Ti) -> AgTi2 + α(Ti)	β(Ti): Ti 0.916; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; α(Ti): Ti 0.958	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Eremenko 1969	Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report
1122	eutectoid: β(Ti) -> AgTi2 + α(Ti)	β(Ti): Ti 0.917; AgTi2: Ti 0.667; α(Ti): Ti 0.958	experimental	[2] Li 2005 cites Adenstedt 1953	Table 3, p. 4, row 13 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (7)

Phase equilibrium, Ag–Ti system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	1023	(Ag) + TiAg (Ag): Ag 0.9696, Ti 0.0304; TiAg: Ag 0.5117, Ti 0.4883	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Phase composition	1023	Ti2Ag + α(Ti) Ti2Ag: Ag 0.3307, Ti 0.6693; α(Ti): Ag 0.0234, Ti 0.9766	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
Phase composition	1023	TiAg + Ti2Ag TiAg: Ag 0.4785, Ti 0.5215; Ti2Ag: Ag 0.3307, Ti 0.6693	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Phase composition	1253	L + TiAg L: Ag 0.9636, Ti 0.0364; TiAg: Ag 0.5021, Ti 0.4979	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
Phase composition	1253	TiAg + β(Ti) TiAg: Ag 0.4986, Ti 0.5014; β(Ti): Ag 0.1516, Ti 0.8484	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
Phase composition	1373	L + β(Ti) L: Ag 0.937, Ti 0.063; β(Ti): Ag 0.1665, Ti 0.8335	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
Phase composition	1473	L + β(Ti) L: Ag 0.875, Ti 0.125; β(Ti): Ag 0.1923, Ti 0.8077	experimental	[2] Li 2005	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report

Crystal structure (29)

Crystal structure, Ag–Ti system
Property	Value	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	2.889 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice a	2.878 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice a	2.932 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice a	2.888 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice a	2.9 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice a	2.904 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice a	2.96 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
Lattice a	2.95 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report
Lattice a	2.909 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice b	2.889 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice b	2.878 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice b	2.932 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice b	2.888 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice b	2.9 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice b	2.904 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice b	2.96 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
Lattice b	2.95 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report
Lattice b	2.909 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice c	2.889 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice c	2.878 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice c	2.932 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice c	2.888 Å	(Ag) alloy: Ti 0	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice c	8.15 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice c	8.12 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 16 report
Lattice c	8.14 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report
Lattice c	8.225 Å	AgTi alloy: Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice c	11.85 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
Lattice c	12.183 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice c	11.82 Å	AgTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Gierlotka 2023	Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Wojciech Gierlotka, Adam Dębski, Władysław Gąsior, Marek Polański, Computational approach to the Ag-Ti system, Computational Materials Science 230, 112519 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112519
Mei Li, Changrong Li, Fuming Wang, Weijing Zhang, Experimental study and thermodynamic assessment of the Ag–Ti system, Calphad 29, 269-275 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.09.002

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}