Al–Mo–Ni system

40 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 19, model 7, DFT 6, unspecified 8); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	19
model	7
DFT	6
unspecified	8

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	27
phase transition	9
phase equilibrium	4

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Al–Mo–Ni system (27)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Class	Source	Location
1891	Liquid -> bcc + B2	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report
1875	Liquid -> bcc + B2	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 1 report
1873	Liquid -> bcc + B2	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1986	Table 3, p. 3, row 2 report
1868	Liquid -> bcc + B2	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Ferrandini 2004 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report
1617	quasi-peritectic: U1: Liquid + B2 -> bcc + L12	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report
1613	quasi-peritectic: U1: Liquid + B2 -> bcc + L12	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1986	Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report
1605	quasi-peritectic: U1: Liquid + B2 -> bcc + L12	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report
1604	eutectic: E: Liquid -> fcc + L12 + bcc	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 27 report
1600	eutectic: E: Liquid -> fcc + L12 + bcc	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 23 report
1583	quasi-peritectic: U2: Liquid + NiMo -> bcc + fcc	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1986	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
1578	eutectic: E: Liquid -> fcc + L12 + bcc	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Pearson 1977	Table 3, p. 3, row 25 report
1574	quasi-peritectic: U2: Liquid + NiMo -> bcc + fcc	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report
1573	eutectic: E: Liquid -> fcc + L12 + bcc	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1986	Table 3, p. 3, row 26 report
1573	eutectic: E: Liquid -> fcc + L12 + bcc	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Yoshizawa 1981 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 24 report
1573	quasi-peritectic: U2: Liquid + NiMo -> bcc + fcc	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report
1468	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Pearson 1977	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
1403	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Wakashima 1983 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report
1403	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1989	Table 3, p. 3, row 16 report
1400	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report
1400	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Miracle 1984 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report
1400	quasi-peritectic: U3: bcc + fcc -> L12 + NiMo	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 17 report
1385	quasi-peritectic: U2: Liquid + NiMo -> bcc + fcc	experimental	[1] Peng 2016 cites Pearson 1977	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
1167	quasi-peritectic: U4: NiMo + fcc -> L12 + Ni3Mo	DFT	[1] Peng 2016 cites Zhou 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 20 report
1163	quasi-peritectic: U4: NiMo + fcc -> L12 + Ni3Mo	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1988	Table 3, p. 3, row 19 report
1163	quasi-peritectic: U4: NiMo + fcc -> L12 + Ni3Mo	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 18 report
1003	quasi-peritectic: U5: Ni3Mo + fcc -> L12 + Ni4Mo	model	[1] Peng 2016	Table 3, p. 3, row 21 report
1003	quasi-peritectic: U5: Ni3Mo + fcc -> L12 + Ni4Mo	unspecified	[1] Peng 2016 cites Maslenkov 1988	Table 3, p. 3, row 22 report

Other properties

Phase transition (9)

Phase transition, Al–Mo–Ni system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase transition	1857 K	1857	other: x = 15 alloy: Mo 0.15	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Phase transition	1862 K	1862	other: x = 10 alloy: Mo 0.1	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Phase transition	1868 K	1868	other: x = 6	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Phase transition	1874 K	1874	other: x = 3	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Phase transition	1899 K	1899	other: x = 30 alloy: Mo 0.3	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Phase transition	1904 K	1904	other: x = 35 alloy: Mo 0.35	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Phase transition	1912 K	1912	other: x = 25 alloy: Mo 0.25	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Phase transition	1914 K	1914	other: x = 40 alloy: Mo 0.4	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
Phase transition	1915 K	1915	other: x = 20 alloy: Mo 0.2	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report

Phase equilibrium (4)

Phase equilibrium, Al–Mo–Ni system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	1955	other: x = 30 liquid: Mo 0.3	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Phase composition	1994	other: x = 25 liquid: Mo 0.25	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Phase composition	2035	other: x = 35 liquid: Mo 0.35	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Phase composition	2068	other: x = 40 liquid: Mo 0.4	experimental	[1] Peng 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jian Peng, Peter Franke, Dario Manara, Tyson Watkins, Rudy J.M. Konings, Hans J. Seifert, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic re-assessment of the Al–Mo–Ni system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 674, 305-314 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.044

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}