Al–Mo–Si system

33 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 15, model 18); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	15
model	18

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	33

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Al–Mo–Si system (33)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2271	other: liq. + C40 + MoSi2	liq.: Al 0.0401, Mo 0.337, Si 0.6229	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 1 report
2196	other: liq. + C40 + Mo5Si3	liq.: Al 0.0805, Mo 0.4331, Si 0.4864	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 3 report
2190	quasi-peritectic: liq. + C40 -> Mo5Si3 + MoSi2		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 6 report
2190	other: liq. + C40 + Mo5Si3		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 4 report
2174	quasi-peritectic: liq. + C40 -> Mo5Si3 + MoSi2	liq.: Al 0.0129, Mo 0.4438, Si 0.5433	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 5 report
2173	other: liq. + C40 + MoSi2		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 2 report
1902	peritectic: liq. + Mo5Si3 + C40 -> C54	liq.: Al 0.519, Mo 0.3353, Si 0.1457	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 7 report
1892	peritectic: liq. + Mo5Si3 + C40 -> C54		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 8 report
1829	quasi-peritectic: liq. + A15 -> AlMo + Mo5Si3	liq.: Al 0.5815, Mo 0.3662, Si 0.0523	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 9 report
1780	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al63Mo37 -> Al8Mo3 + AlMo	liq.: Al 0.6253, Mo 0.3395, Si 0.0352	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 10 report
1780	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Mo5Si3 -> Al8Mo3 + C54		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 14 report
1780	quasi-peritectic: liq. + AlMo -> Al8Mo3 + Mo5Si3		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 12 report
1771	quasi-peritectic: liq. + AlMo -> Al8Mo3 + Mo5Si3	liq.: Al 0.6107, Mo 0.3411, Si 0.0482	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 11 report
1771	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Mo5Si3 -> Al8Mo3 + C54	liq.: Al 0.6112, Mo 0.3391, Si 0.0497	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 13 report
1676	quasi-peritectic: liq. + C54 -> Al8Mo3 + C40	liq.: Al 0.7911, Mo 0.1484, Si 0.0605	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 15 report
1673	quasi-peritectic: liq. + MoSi2 -> diamond + C40		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 18 report
1638	quasi-peritectic: liq. + MoSi2 -> diamond + C40	liq.: Al 0.0946, Mo 0.0463, Si 0.8591	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 17 report
1491	quasi-peritectic: liq. + C54 -> Al8Mo3 + C40		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 16 report
1491	peritectic: liq. + Al8Mo3 + C40 -> Al4Mo	liq.: Al 0.8834, Mo 0.0758, Si 0.0408	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 19 report
1491	peritectic: liq. + Al8Mo3 + C40 -> Al4Mo		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 20 report
1481	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al8Mo3 -> Al4Mo + Al3Mo	liq.: Al 0.919, Mo 0.065, Si 0.016	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 21 report
1151	peritectic: liq. + Al4Mo + Al17Mo4 -> Al5Mo	liq.: Al 0.9837, Mo 0.011, Si 0.0053	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 22 report
1149	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al17Mo4 -> Al22Mo5 + Al5Mo	liq.: Al 0.9851, Mo 0.0107, Si 0.0042	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 24 report
1104	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al17Mo4 -> Al22Mo5 + Al5Mo		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 25 report
1097	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al4Mo -> C40 + Al5Mo	liq.: Al 0.968, Mo 0.0082, Si 0.0238	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 26 report
1097	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al4Mo -> C40 + Al5Mo		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 27 report
1097	peritectic: liq. + Al4Mo + Al17Mo4 -> Al5Mo		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 23 report
991	peritectic: liq. + Al5Mo + C40 -> Al12Mo	liq.: Al 0.9734, Mo 0.0026, Si 0.024	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 28 report
991	peritectic: liq. + Al5Mo + C40 -> Al12Mo		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 29 report
905	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al12Mo -> fcc + C40		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 31 report
899	quasi-peritectic: liq. + Al12Mo -> fcc + C40	liq.: Al 0.944, Mo 4.000e-4, Si 0.0556	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 30 report
850	eutectic: liq. -> diamond + fcc + C40	liq.: Al 0.8789, Mo 2.000e-4, Si 0.1209	model	[1] Guo 2012	Table 2, p. 6, row 32 report
847	eutectic: liq. -> diamond + fcc + C40		experimental	[1] Guo 2012 cites Ponweiser 2011 doi	Table 2, p. 6, row 33 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Cuiping Guo, Changrong Li, Patrick J. Masset, Zhenmin Du, A thermodynamic description of the Al–Mo–Si system, Calphad 36, 100-109 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.12.003

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}