Al–Ni–W system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 11); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model11
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase equilibrium23

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (23)

Phase equilibrium, Al–Ni–W system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblage1173γ + γ'
alloy: Al 0.135, Ni 0.859, W 0.006
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Phase assemblage1173γ + γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.146, Ni 0.75, W 0.104
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
Phase assemblage1173γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.212, Ni 0.721, W 0.067
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Phase assemblage1273γ + γ'
alloy: Al 0.135, Ni 0.859, W 0.006
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Phase assemblage1273γ + γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.146, Ni 0.75, W 0.104
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Phase assemblage1273γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.212, Ni 0.721, W 0.067
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Phase assemblage1373γ + γ'
alloy: Al 0.135, Ni 0.859, W 0.006
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Phase assemblage1373γ + γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.146, Ni 0.75, W 0.104
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Phase assemblage1373γ' + α
alloy: Al 0.212, Ni 0.721, W 0.067
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Phase composition1173γ + γ′
γ: Al 0.131, Ni 0.864, W 0.005; γ′: Al 0.2, Ni 0.779, W 0.021
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
Phase composition1173γ + γ′
γ: Al 0.122, Ni 0.873, W 0.005; γ′: Al 0.197, Ni 0.777, W 0.026
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 9
report
Phase composition1173γ + γ′ + α
γ: Al 0.087, Ni 0.818, W 0.095; γ′: Al 0.193, Ni 0.758, W 0.049; α: W 1
model[1] Popovič 2008
cites Dupin 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 2
report
Phase composition1173γ + γ′ + α
γ: Al 0.064, Ni 0.826, W 0.11; γ′: Al 0.153, Ni 0.775, W 0.072; α: Al 0.005, Ni 0.123, W 0.872
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 3
report
Phase composition1173γ′ + α
γ′: Al 0.15, Ni 0.773, W 0.077; α: W 1
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 1
report
Phase composition1173γ′ + α
γ′: Al 0.22, Ni 0.747, W 0.033; α: W 1
model[1] Popovič 2008
cites Dupin 2001 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 5
report
Phase composition1173γ′ + α
γ′: Al 0.219, Ni 0.743, W 0.038; α: W 1
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 4
report
Phase composition1173γ′ + α
γ′: Al 0.221, Ni 0.749, W 0.03; α: Al 0.004, Ni 0.156, W 0.84
experimental[1] Popovič 2008Table 2, p. 2, row 6
report
Phase composition1273γ + γ' + α + γ′
γ: Al 0.054, Ni 0.824, W 0.122; γ': Al 0.164, Ni 0.776, W 0.06; α: Al 0.002, Ni 0.123, W 0.875; γ′: Al 0.164, Ni 0.776, W 0.06
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 3, p. 2, row 1
report
Phase composition1273γ + γ' + γ′
γ: Al 0.112, Ni 0.886, W 0.002; γ': Al 0.16, Ni 0.829, W 0.011; γ′: Al 0.16, Ni 0.829, W 0.011
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 3, p. 2, row 3
report
Phase composition1273γ' + α + γ′
γ': Al 0.215, Ni 0.753, W 0.032; α: Al 0.004, Ni 0.112, W 0.884; γ′: Al 0.215, Ni 0.753, W 0.032
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 3, p. 2, row 2
report
Phase composition1373γ + γ′
γ: Al 0.128, Ni 0.866, W 0.006; γ′: Al 0.164, Ni 0.821, W 0.015
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 4, p. 3, row 3
report
Phase composition1373γ + γ′ + α
γ: Al 0.078, Ni 0.819, W 0.103; γ′: Al 0.154, Ni 0.772, W 0.074; α: Al 0.005, Ni 0.12, W 0.875
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 4, p. 3, row 1
report
Phase composition1373γ′ + α
γ′: Al 0.216, Ni 0.752, W 0.032; α: Al 0.007, Ni 0.139, W 0.854
model[1] Popovič 2008Table 4, p. 3, row 2
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. J. Popovič, P. Brož, J. Buršík, Microstructure and phase equilibria in the Ni–Al–W system, Intermetallics 16, 884-888 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2008.04.003