Au–Bi–Sb system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9, model 10, unspecified 4); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	9
model	10
unspecified	4

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	23

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Bi–Sb system (23)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
740	peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2	L: Au 0.345	model	[1] Wang 2007 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 18 report
651	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.681	model	[1] Wang 2007	Table I, p. 3, row 7 report
651	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.666	unspecified	[1] Wang 2007 cites Evans 1983	Table I, p. 3, row 3 report
651	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi		experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Zoro 2005 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 4 report
647.8	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.667	model	[1] Wang 2007 cites Chevalier 1988 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 6 report
646	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.68	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Gather 1975	Table I, p. 3, row 2 report
644	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.678	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Okamoto 1983 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 5 report
644	peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi	L: Bi 0.669	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Nathans 1962 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 1 report
626	eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Au 0.634	model	[1] Wang 2007 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 19 report
562	quasi-peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi + AuSb2	L: Au 0.455, Bi 0.336	model	[1] Wang 2007	Table I, p. 3, row 21 report
561	quasi-peritectic: L + (Au) -> Au2Bi + AuSb2	L: Au 0.49, Bi 0.28	unspecified	[1] Wang 2007 cites Gather 1981	Table I, p. 3, row 20 report
515.1	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)		experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Zoro 2005 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 11 report
514.4	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.868	model	[1] Wang 2007 cites Chevalier 1988 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 13 report
514.1	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.868	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Nathans 1962 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 8 report
514	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.85	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Gather 1975	Table I, p. 3, row 9 report
514	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.863	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Okamoto 1983 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 12 report
514	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.864	unspecified	[1] Wang 2007 cites Evans 1983	Table I, p. 3, row 10 report
512.9	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.867	model	[1] Wang 2007	Table I, p. 3, row 14 report
512	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + AuSb2 + (Bi)	L: Au 0.167, Bi 0.787	model	[1] Wang 2007	Table I, p. 3, row 23 report
511	eutectic: L -> Au2Bi + AuSb2 + (Bi)	L: Au 0.183, Bi 0.735	unspecified	[1] Wang 2007 cites Gather 1981	Table I, p. 3, row 22 report
389	Au2Bi -> (Au) + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.333	experimental	[1] Wang 2007 cites Okamoto 1983 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 16 report
382.7	Au2Bi -> (Au) + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2007 cites Chevalier 1988 doi	Table I, p. 3, row 15 report
375	Au2Bi -> (Au) + (Bi)	L: Bi 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2007	Table I, p. 3, row 17 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

J. Wang, F.G. Meng, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Au-Bi-Sb Ternary System, Journal of Elec Materi 36, 568-577 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11664-007-0090-z

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}