Au–Ce system

231 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 81, model 102, DFT 11, unspecified 37); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (14) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	81
model	102
DFT	11
unspecified	37

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	125
formation	64
crystal structure	42

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
AuCe-13Don.tdb	H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, M. Paulasto-Krockel, Calphad, 42, 38-50(2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.013	`1a117620cb88dd03720965d293a818bb3585706d6b53c7eb793555d83dfa80fc`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, J. Alloys Compd., 683, 599-609(2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.116	`2e0b5c8707b4c9af4d79f2f8a23a54c3d860e9e16ddd9f45fdac4e56998d2aa7`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1336.73	AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.38497) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1336.73	AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.38491) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1311.12	AU51CE14 (x(Ce) 0.21538) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.27586) + AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1021.9	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.10766) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286) + AU51CE14 (x(Ce) 0.21538)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1021.9	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.10774) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286) + AU51CE14 (x(Ce) 0.21538)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1000.21	AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333) + AU4CE3 (x(Ce) 0.42857) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1000	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.9509) + BCC_A2 (x(Ce) 1) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 1)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	1000	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.95124) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Ce) 1)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	941.99	FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.08238) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	941.99	FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.08234) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	941.99	FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.0823) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	939.87	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.72297)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	939.87	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.72264)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	792.82	AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.8353) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 1)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	792.82	AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.83522) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 1)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	792.82	AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.83547) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 1)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	753.22	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE_B27 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667)
AuCe-13Don.tdb	753.22	AU4CE3 (x(Ce) 0.42857) + AUCE_B27 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1435.29	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.39674) + AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.47835)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1435.29	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.39671) + AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.47834)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1375.23	AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.37952) + AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1375.23	AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.37948) + AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1335.12	AU51CE14_HT (x(Ce) 0.21538) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.27732) + AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1335.12	AU51CE14_HT (x(Ce) 0.21538) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.27734) + AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1199.15	AU51CE14_HT (x(Ce) 0.21538) + AU51CE14_LT (x(Ce) 0.21538) + AU2CE (x(Ce) 0.33333)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1199.15	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.12615) + AU51CE14_LT (x(Ce) 0.21538) + AU51CE14_HT (x(Ce) 0.21538)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1062.51	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.1037) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286) + AU51CE14_LT (x(Ce) 0.21538)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1062.51	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.10383) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286) + AU51CE14_LT (x(Ce) 0.21538)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1052.59	FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 9.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.09653) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	1052.59	FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 9.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.09653) + AU6CE (x(Ce) 0.14286)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	988.89	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.68066)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	988.89	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.68061)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	971.09	LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.90236) + BCC_A2 (x(Ce) 0.9853) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0.99258)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	873.89	AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE_B27 (x(Ce) 0.5) + AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	872.3	AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.49441) + AUCE_B27 (x(Ce) 0.49449)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	872.3	AU11CE9 (x(Ce) 0.45) + AUCE_B33 (x(Ce) 0.4944) + AUCE_B27 (x(Ce) 0.49448)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	819.36	AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.81814) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0.97663)
AuCe-16Mou.tdb	819.36	AUCE2_C37 (x(Ce) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ce) 0.8181) + FCC_A1 (x(Ce) 0.97661)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AuCe-13Don

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Ce system (125)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location	Quote
1645	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 15 report
1645	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
1645	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 21 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
1645	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report
1645	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 16 report
1645	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report
1643	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 22 report
1623	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCeAu	Liq: Au 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
1623	congruent melting: L->βAuCe	L: Au 0.5; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
1493	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 50 report
1491	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 44 report
1479	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 37 report
1477	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 31 report
1470	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce9Au11	Liq: Au 0.59; βCeAu: Au 0.516; Ce9Au11: Au 0.555	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 68 report
1470	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce9Au11	Liq: Au 0.58; βCeAu: Au 0.52; Ce9Au11: Au 0.555	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 69 report
1423	congruent melting: L->Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.797; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 40 report
1423	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 48 report
1423	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 47 report
1423	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.75; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 45 report
1423	congruent melting: L->Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.797; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 39 report
1423	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.724; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 43 report
1423	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 46 report
1423	congruent melting: L->Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.797; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 38 report
1423	congruent melting: L->Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.797; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 37 report
1423	congruent melting: L->Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.75; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 36 report
1423	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.69; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 42 report
1423	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.72; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 41 report
1423	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.69; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 40 report
1423	congruent melting: Liq ↔ βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 49 report
1423	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.69; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 39 report
1403	congruent melting: L->Au2Ce	L: Au 0.667; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 26 report
1403	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 33 report
1403	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 35 report
1403	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 34 report
1403	congruent melting: L->Au2Ce	L: Au 0.667; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 30 report
1403	congruent melting: L->Au2Ce	L: Au 0.667; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 29 report
1403	congruent melting: L->Au2Ce	L: Au 0.667; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 27 report
1403	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 36 report
1403	congruent melting: L->Au2Ce	L: Au 0.667; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 28 report
1403	congruent melting: Liq ↔ CeAu2	Liq: Au 0.667; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 32 report
1376	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + Ce9Au11	Liq: Au 0.62; CeAu2: Au 0.667; Ce9Au11: Au 0.55	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 30 report
1376	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + Ce9Au11	Liq: Au 0.62; CeAu2: Au 0.667; Ce9Au11: Au 0.55	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 29 report
1353	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+βAuCe	L: Au 0.628; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 23 report
1341	Liq ↔ CeAu2 + βCe14Au51	Liq: Au 0.723; CeAu2: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 38 report
1337	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+βAuCe	L: Au 0.615; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 25 report
1311	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.724; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 35 report
1298	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.69; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 32 report
1298	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.69; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 34 report
1298	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.69; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 31 report
1298	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+Au51Ce14	L: Au 0.72; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 33 report
1268	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+βAuCe	L: Au 0.613; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 22 report
1268	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+βAuCe	L: Au 0.62; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report
1268	eutectic: L->Au2Ce+βAuCe	L: Au 0.613; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 24 report
1203	polymorphic: αCe14Au51 ↔ βCe14Au51	αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 51 report
1203	polymorphic: αCe14Au51 ↔ βCe14Au51	αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; βCe14Au51: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 52 report
1173	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.89; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 56 report
1143	L+Au51Ce14->Au6Ce	L: Au 0.89; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 41 report
1143	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.874; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 55 report
1143	L+Au51Ce14->Au6Ce	L: Au 0.874; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 42 report
1143	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.89; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 54 report
1081	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	L: Au 0.902; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 45 report
1081	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	L: Au 0.91; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 47 report
1081	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.905; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 64 report
1081	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	L: Au 0.905; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 48 report
1081	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	L: Au 0.905; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 46 report
1081	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.91; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 63 report
1081	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.902; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 61 report
1081	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.905; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 62 report
1079	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.895; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 53 report
1077	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.89; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 59 report
1071	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.915; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 67 report
1065	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.905; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 60 report
1023	L+Au51Ce14->Au6Ce	Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Boulet 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 43 report
1023	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Boulet 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 49 report
1023	βAuCe+Au2Ce->Au4Ce3	βAuCe: Au 0.571; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au4Ce3: Au 0.571429, Ce 0.428571	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Boulet 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 51 report
1023	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Boulet 2001 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 65 report
1023	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Boulet 2001 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 57 report
1021	L+Au51Ce14->Au6Ce	L: Au 0.892; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 44 report
1021	Liq + αCe14Au51 ↔ CeAu6	Liq: Au 0.892; αCe14Au51: Au 0.785; CeAu6: Au 0.857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 58 report
998	βAuCe+Au2Ce->Au4Ce3	βAuCe: Au 0.571; Au2Ce: Au 0.666667, Ce 0.333333; Au4Ce3: Au 0.571429, Ce 0.428571	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 52 report
992	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.27; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report
991	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.32; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report
971	δ(Ce) ↔ γ(Ce) + Liq	δ(Ce): Au 0.015; γ(Ce): Au 0.0074; Liq: Au 0.097	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 70 report
969	δ(Ce) ↔ γ(Ce) + Liq	δ(Ce): Au 0.02; γ(Ce): Au 0.01; Liq: Au 0.059	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 71 report
941	Liq ↔ CeAu6 + Au (fcc)	Liq: Au 0.917; CeAu6: Au 0.857; Au (fcc): Au 1	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 66 report
941	eutectic: L->Au6Ce+Au(fcc)	L: Au 0.917; Au6Ce: Au 0.857143, Ce 0.142857	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 50 report
940	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.277; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
940	L+βAuCe->AuCe2	L: Au 0.277; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
938	L+βAuCe->AuCe2	L: Au 0.24; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report
938	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.252; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report
938	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.24; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report
938	L+βAuCe->AuCe2	L: Au 0.235; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report
938	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.235; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
938	L+βAuCe->AuCe2	L: Au 0.252; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report
930	Liq + βCeAu ↔ Ce2Au	Liq: Au 0.215; βCeAu: Au 0.5; Ce2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
930	L+βAuCe->AuCe2	L: Au 0.215; βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
865	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 23 report
865	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 28 report
821	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.181; Ce2Au: Au 0.334; γCe: Au 0.0231	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report
818	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.17; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report
793	eutectic: L->γCe+AuCe2	L: Au 0.16; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
793	eutectic: L->γCe+AuCe2	L: Au 0.164; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
793	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.16; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
793	eutectic: L->γCe+AuCe2	L: Au 0.16; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Vogel 1943	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
793	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.16; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
793	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.16; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Vogel 1943	Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report
793	eutectic: L->γCe+AuCe2	L: Au 0.16; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
793	eutectic: L->γCe+AuCe2	L: Au 0.16; AuCe2: Au 0.333333, Ce 0.666667	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
793	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.164; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
793	Liq ↔ Ce2Au + γCe	Liq: Au 0.16; Ce2Au: Au 0.334	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneider 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
753	polymorphic: βAuCe->αAuCe	βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; αAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013	Table 2, p. 3, row 20 report
753	polymorphic: βAuCe->αAuCe	βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; αAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 2, p. 3, row 17 report
753	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 4, p. 5, row 25 report
753	polymorphic: βAuCe->αAuCe	βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; αAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1986	Table 2, p. 3, row 18 report
753	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 4, p. 5, row 26 report
753	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 4, p. 5, row 24 report
753	polymorphic: αCeAu ↔ βCeAu	αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; βCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 27 report
753	polymorphic: βAuCe->αAuCe	βAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5; αAuCe: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1990	Table 2, p. 3, row 19 report
465	eutectoid		model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	p. 3 report	Besides, they also proposed a eutectoid reaction of Au2Ce at 465 K [14].
465	Au2Ce->Au4Ce3+Au51Ce14	Au2Ce: Au 0.667; Au4Ce3: Au 0.571429, Ce 0.428571; Au51Ce14: Au 0.784615, Ce 0.215385	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 2, p. 3, row 53 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Au–Ce system (49)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Au2Ce		-71.46 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 10 report
Au2Ce	Au2Ce	-70 kJ/mol-atom	289	model	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 12 report
Au2Ce	Au2Ce	-57.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.7	298.15	experimental	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[1] Dong 2013 cites Fitzner 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 11 report
Au4Ce3		-74.32 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 8 report
Au4Ce3	Au4Ce3	-73.82 kJ/mol-atom	289	model		-75.24 (oqmd-1484238)	[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 9 report
Au51Ce14		-57.71 kJ/mol-atom	289	model			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 14 report
Au51Ce14		-49.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2	298.15	experimental			[1] Dong 2013 cites Fitzner 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 13 report
Au6Ce	Au6Ce	-41.59 kJ/mol-atom	289	model	-36.558 (mp-aaackuug)	-40.358 (oqmd-1821063)	[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 16 report
Au6Ce		-39.76 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 15 report
AuCe2	AuCe2	-59.39 kJ/mol-atom	289	model	-33.544 (mp-aaacksso)	-50.205 (oqmd-1520580)	[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 3 report
AuCe2	AuCe2	-55 kJ/mol-atom ± 1	300	experimental	-33.544 (mp-aaacksso)	-50.205 (oqmd-1520580)	[1] Dong 2013 cites Ferro 2001 doi	Table 4, p. 4, row 2 report
AuCe2		-50.99 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 1 report
Ce2Au	AuCe2	-61 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-33.544 (mp-aaacksso)	-50.205 (oqmd-1520580)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
Ce2Au	AuCe2	-59.39 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-33.544 (mp-aaacksso)	-50.205 (oqmd-1520580)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
Ce2Au	AuCe2	-55 kJ/mol-atom ± 1	298.15	experimental	-33.544 (mp-aaacksso)	-50.205 (oqmd-1520580)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Ferro 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Ce2Au		-50.99 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	DFT			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Blo	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Ce9Au11		-75.9 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 30 report
Ce9Au11		-73.82 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 29 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-73 kJ/mol-atom	1123	experimental	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 2, p. 3, row 16 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-71.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	1123	experimental	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 15 report
CeAu2		-71.46 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	DFT			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Blo	Table 2, p. 3, row 18 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-70.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 19 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-70 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 20 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-66 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report
CeAu2	Au2Ce	-57.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.7	298.15	experimental	-65.398 (mp-aaacjhwc)	-73.098 (oqmd-2025792)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 17 report
CeAu6	Au6Ce	-45.8 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-36.558 (mp-aaackuug)	-40.358 (oqmd-1821063)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 33 report
CeAu6	Au6Ce	-41.59 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-36.558 (mp-aaackuug)	-40.358 (oqmd-1821063)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 32 report
CeAu6		-39.76 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	DFT			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Blo	Table 2, p. 3, row 31 report
αAuCe	AuCe	-76.02 kJ/mol-atom	289	model	-61.985 (mp-aaacfybf)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 7 report
αAuCe		-75.36 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 5 report
αAuCe	AuCe	-62.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.2	298.15	experimental	-61.985 (mp-aaacfybf)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[1] Dong 2013 cites Fitzner 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 6 report
αCe14Au51		-57.71 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 26 report
αCe14Au51		-55.99 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 27 report
αCe14Au51		-55 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.7	1123	experimental			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 22 report
αCe14Au51		-53.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.9	298.15	experimental			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 24 report
αCe14Au51		-49.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2	298.15	experimental			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 25 report
αCe14Au51		-44 kJ/mol-atom ± 5	1223	experimental			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 2, p. 3, row 23 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-78.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-76.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.9	298.15	experimental	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-76.02 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
αCeAu		-75.36 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	DFT			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Blo	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-75.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4	1123	experimental	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-74 kJ/mol-atom ± 1	1123	experimental	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
αCeAu	AuCe	-62.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.2	298.15	experimental	-61.504 (mp-aaacgizc)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report
βAuCe		-74.71 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 4 report
βCe14Au51		-53.1 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 28 report
βCeAu	AuCe	-79 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.985 (mp-aaacfybf)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
βCeAu	AuCe	-75.7 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.985 (mp-aaacfybf)	-75.308 (oqmd-28133)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report
βCeAu		-74.71 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	DFT			[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Blo	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report

Other properties

Formation (15)

Formation, Au–Ce system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-4.6 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Ce2Au alloy: Ce 0.666667	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-7.3464 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Ce2Au alloy: Ce 0.666667	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-1.145 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Ce9Au11 alloy: Ce 0.45	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 29 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-2.07 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Ce9Au11 alloy: Ce 0.45	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 30 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-0.28 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	CeAu2 alloy: Ce 0.333333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 20 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-0.97 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	CeAu2 alloy: Ce 0.333333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-2.65 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	CeAu6 alloy: Ce 0.142857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 32 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-11.6 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	CeAu6 alloy: Ce 0.142857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 33 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-0.66 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αCe14Au51 alloy: Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 26 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-3.1 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αCe14Au51 alloy: Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 27 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-1.23 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αCeAu alloy: Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-1.98 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αCeAu alloy: Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-5.4 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	βCe14Au51 alloy: Ce 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 28 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-2.43 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	βCeAu alloy: Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-0.81 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	βCeAu alloy: Ce 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report

Crystal structure (42)

Crystal structure, Au–Ce system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	4.528 Å	298.15	Au2Ce alloy: Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice a	13.887 Å	298.15	Au4Ce3 alloy: Ce 0.428571	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Ferro 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice a	12.77 Å	298.15	Au51Ce14 alloy: Ce 0.215385	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Lattice a	12.81 Å	298.15	Au51Ce14 alloy: Ce 0.215385	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice a	7.8 Å ± 10	298.15	Au6Ce alloy: Ce 0.142857	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice a	7.271 Å ± 7	298.15	AuCe2 alloy: Ce 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
Lattice a	7.271 Å	298.15	Ce2Au Ce2Au: Au 0.334, Ce 0.666	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice a	4.528 Å	298.15	CeAu2 CeAu2: Au 0.667, Ce 0.333	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Iandelli 1968 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice a	0.78 not_printed ± 1	298.15	CeAu6 CeAu6: Au 0.857, Ce 0.143	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice a	7.43 Å	298.15	αAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Lattice a	12.77 Å	298.15	αCe14Au51 αCe14Au51: Au 0.785, Ce 0.215	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
Lattice a	12.81 Å	298.15	αCe14Au51 αCe14Au51: Au 0.785, Ce 0.215	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Lattice a	7.43 Å	298.15	αCeAu αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice a	3.9 Å	298.15	βAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Lattice a	3.9 Å	298.15	βCeAu βCeAu: Au 0.52, Ce 0.48	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice a	5.161 Å	298.15	γCe γCe: Au 0.01, Ce 0.99	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice a	4.12 Å	298.15	δCe δCe: Au 0.02, Ce 0.98	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice b	7.203 Å	298.15	Au2Ce alloy: Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice b	7.78 Å ± 10	298.15	Au6Ce alloy: Ce 0.142857	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice b	5.073 Å ± 6	298.15	AuCe2 alloy: Ce 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
Lattice b	5.073 Å	298.15	Ce2Au Ce2Au: Au 0.334, Ce 0.666	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice b	7.203 Å	298.15	CeAu2 CeAu2: Au 0.667, Ce 0.333	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Iandelli 1968 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice b	0.778 not_printed ± 1	298.15	CeAu6 CeAu6: Au 0.857, Ce 0.143	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice b	4.66 Å	298.15	αAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Lattice b	4.66 Å	298.15	αCeAu αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice b	11.14 Å	298.15	βAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Lattice b	11.14 Å	298.15	βCeAu βCeAu: Au 0.52, Ce 0.48	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice c	8.068 Å	298.15	Au2Ce alloy: Ce 0.333333	model	[1] Dong 2013 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice c	6.17 Å	298.15	Au4Ce3 alloy: Ce 0.428571	experimental	[1] Dong 2013 cites Ferro 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice c	9.29 Å	298.15	Au51Ce14 alloy: Ce 0.215385	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Lattice c	9.327 Å ± 3	298.15	Au51Ce14 alloy: Ce 0.215385	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice c	9.08 Å ± 10	298.15	Au6Ce alloy: Ce 0.142857	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice c	9.32 Å ± 9	298.15	AuCe2 alloy: Ce 0.666667	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
Lattice c	9.32 Å	298.15	Ce2Au Ce2Au: Au 0.334, Ce 0.666	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice c	8.068 Å	298.15	CeAu2 CeAu2: Au 0.667, Ce 0.333	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Iandelli 1968 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice c	0.908 not_printed ± 1	298.15	CeAu6 CeAu6: Au 0.857, Ce 0.143	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
Lattice c	5.93 Å	298.15	αAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Lattice c	9.29 Å	298.15	αCe14Au51 αCe14Au51: Au 0.785, Ce 0.215	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
Lattice c	0.9327 not_printed ± 0.3	298.15	αCe14Au51 αCe14Au51: Au 0.785, Ce 0.215	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Lattice c	5.93 Å	298.15	αCeAu αCeAu: Au 0.5, Ce 0.5	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice c	4.75 Å	298.15	βAuCe alloy: Ce 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Lattice c	4.75 Å	298.15	βCeAu βCeAu: Au 0.52, Ce 0.48	unspecified	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Mcmasters 1971	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic modeling of Au–Ce–Sn ternary system, Calphad 42, 38-50 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.013
D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the cerium gold binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 683, 599-609 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.116

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}