Au–Fe system

10 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 3); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental7
model3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction10

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AuFe-09Liu.tdbY. Liu, Y. Ge, D. Yu, J. Alloys Compd., 476, 79-83(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.01262024cbf6a5a64b2e47a21dc686240050056f7de3116f214f717ad5406a4c3d9viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AuFe-09Liu.tdb1706.1LIQUID (x(Fe) 0.91092) + FCC_A1 (x(Fe) 0.97623) + BCC_A2 (x(Fe) 0.97905)
AuFe-09Liu.tdb1445.86LIQUID (x(Fe) 0.55299) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Fe) 0.72411) + FCC_A1 (x(Fe) 0.91087)
AuFe-09Liu.tdb1110.84FCC_A1 (x(Fe) 0.50773) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Fe) 0.97804) + BCC_A2 (x(Fe) 0.9909)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Fe system (10)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1706liq + bcc -> fccL: Fe 0.911; bcc: Fe 0.979; fcc: Fe 0.976model[1] Liu 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
1706liq + bcc -> fccL: Fe 0.897; bcc: Fe 0.977; fcc: Fe 0.972experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Buckley 1963
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
1446liq + fcc -> fccL: Fe 0.553; fcc: Fe 0.724model[1] Liu 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
1444liq + fcc -> fccfcc: Fe 0.959experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Buckley 1963
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
1441liq + fcc -> fccL: Fe 0.566; fcc: Fe 0.694experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Isaac 1907
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
1441liq + fcc -> fccL: Fe 0.57; fcc: Fe 0.745experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Raub 1950
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
1176fcc -> fcc + bccfcc: Fe 0.56experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Raub 1950
Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
1133fcc -> fcc + bccfcc: Fe 0.978; bcc: Fe 0.994experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Seigle 1956
Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
1111fcc -> fcc + bccfcc: Fe 0.508; bcc: Fe 0.991model[1] Liu 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
1103fcc -> fcc + bccexperimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Isaac 1907
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yajun Liu, Yang Ge, Di Yu, Thermodynamic descriptions for Au–Fe and Na–Zn binary systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 476, 79-83 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.012