Au–Ga–In system

31 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 6, model 18, unspecified 7); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	6
model	18
unspecified	7

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	18
crystal structure	13

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Ga–In system (18)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
673.15	peritectic: L + AuGa2 + AuIn2 -> Au2InGa2	L: Au 0.4368, Ga 0.3168, In 0.2494	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 11 report
672.15	peritectic: L + AuIn2 + Au2InGa2 -> AuGa	L: Au 0.4466, Ga 0.3295, In 0.2239	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 12 report
671.15	peritectic: L + hcp -> Au3In + D024	L: Au 0.7181, Ga 0.0884, In 0.1935	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report
658.15	peritectic: L + AuIn2 + Au2InGa2 -> AuIn	L: Au 0.4851, Ga 0.2481, In 0.2668	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 13 report
657.15	eutectic: L -> Au2InGa2 + AuIn + AuGa	L: Au 0.4879, Ga 0.2486, In 0.2635	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 14 report
649.15	peritectic: L + Au9In4 -> Au3In + Au7In3	L: Au 0.6924, Ga 0.0847, In 0.2228	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 2 report
637.15	peritectic: L + Au9In4 + Au7In3 -> Au3In2	L: Au 0.66, Ga 0.0823, In 0.2577	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 3 report
613.15	peritectic: L + Au7Ga2-HT -> D024 + Au7Ga2-LT	L: Au 0.724, Ga 0.1803, In 0.0957	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 4 report
580.15	peritectic: L + D024 -> Au3In + Au7Ga2-LT	L: Au 0.7078, Ga 0.149, In 0.1432	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 5 report
566.15	peritectic: L + Au7Ga2-LT + Au3In -> Au7In3	L: Au 0.6954, Ga 0.1515, In 0.1531	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report
563.15	peritectic: L + (Ga) -> Au2InGa2 + AuGa2	L: Au 0, Ga 0.9947, In 0.0053	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 16 report
557.15	peritectic: L + Au7Ga2-LT -> Au7In3 + Au7Ga3	L: Au 0.6856, Ga 0.1596, In 0.1548	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 7 report
549.15	peritectic: L + AuIn -> Au3In2 + AuGa	L: Au 0.6492, Ga 0.159, In 0.1918	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 8 report
547.15	eutectic: L -> Au7In3 + Au3In2 + AuGa	L: Au 0.6511, Ga 0.1588, In 0.1901	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 9 report
545.15	eutectic: L -> Au7In3 + Au7Ga3 + AuGa	L: Au 0.6572, Ga 0.1637, In 0.1791	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 10 report
465.15	peritectic: L + Au2InGa2 -> AuGa2 + AuIn2	L: Au 0.0179, Ga 0.6524, In 0.3297	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 15 report
425.15	eutectic: L -> Au2InGa2 + (In) + (Ga)	L: Au 0, Ga 0.8571, In 0.1429	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 17 report
369.15	peritectic: L + (In) -> Au2InGa2 + AuGa2	L: Au 4.000e-4, Ga 0.214, In 0.7856	model	[1] Ghasemi 2014	Table 3, p. 6, row 18 report

Other properties

Crystal structure (13)

Crystal structure, Au–Ga–In system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	4.2047 Å	298.15	Au2InGa2 Au2InGa2: Au 0.4, Ga 0.4, In 0.2	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Ghasemi 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
Lattice a	6.3971 Å	298.15	AuGa AuGa: Au 0.47, Ga 0.5, In 0.03	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Cooke 1966 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice a	6.0758 Å	298.15	AuGa2 AuGa2: Au 0.278, Ga 0.667, In 0.055	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Cooke 1966 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 25 report
Lattice a	4.3 Å	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Lattice a	6.515 Å	298.15	AuIn2 AuIn2: Au 0.238, Ga 0.095, In 0.667	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 28 report
Lattice b	6.262 Å	298.15	AuGa AuGa: Au 0.47, Ga 0.5, In 0.03	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Cooke 1966 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice b	10.59 Å	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Lattice c	12.967 Å	298.15	Au2InGa2 Au2InGa2: Au 0.4, Ga 0.4, In 0.2	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Ghasemi 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
Lattice c	3.463 Å	298.15	AuGa AuGa: Au 0.47, Ga 0.5, In 0.03	experimental	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Cooke 1966 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice c	3.56 Å	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice alpha	90.54 °	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice beta	90 °	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice gamma	90.17 °	298.15	AuIn AuIn: Ga 0.04	unspecified	[1] Ghasemi 2014 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

M. Ghasemi, B. Sundman, S.G. Fries, J. Johansson, The thermodynamic assessment of the Au–In–Ga system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 600, 178-185 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.071

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}