Au–Ge–Sn system

15 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 7, unspecified 1); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	7
model	7
unspecified	1

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	15

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Ge–Sn system (15)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
683	eutectic: L -> diamond_A4 + AuSn	L: Ge 0.07	unspecified	[1] Wang 2009 cites Humpston 1985	Table 3, p. 3, row 1 report
682	eutectic: L -> diamond_A4 + AuSn	L: Ge 0.05, Sn 0.475	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 2 report
681	eutectic: L -> diamond_A4 + AuSn	L: Ge 0.033, Sn 0.483	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report
625	quasi-peritectic: L + fcc_A1 -> D024 + diamond_A4	L: Ge 0.22, Sn 0.08	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report
624	quasi-peritectic: L + fcc_A1 -> D024 + diamond_A4	L: Ge 0.242, Sn 0.047	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report
608	quasi-peritectic: L + D024 -> hcp_A3 + diamond_A4	L: Ge 0.137, Sn 0.153	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report
604	quasi-peritectic: L + D024 -> hcp_A3 + diamond_A4	L: Ge 0.131, Sn 0.158	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report
585	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn -> diamond_A4 + AuSn2		experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report
583	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn -> diamond_A4 + AuSn2	L: Ge 0.005, Sn 0.719	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report
540	eutectic: L -> diamond_A4 + hcp_A3 + AuSn	L: Ge 0.03, Sn 0.28	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report
540	eutectic: L -> diamond_A4 + hcp_A3 + AuSn	L: Ge 0.06, Sn 0.27	experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report
524	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn2 -> diamond_A4 + AuSn4	L: Ge 0.002, Sn 0.886	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report
522	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn2 -> diamond_A4 + AuSn4		experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report
487	eutectic: L -> bct_A5 + diamond_A4 + AuSn4	L: Ge 0.002, Sn 0.953	model	[1] Wang 2009	Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report
486	eutectic: L -> bct_A5 + diamond_A4 + AuSn4		experimental	[1] Wang 2009 cites Mouani 1992 doi	Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

J. Wang, C. Leinenbach, M. Roth, Thermodynamic modeling of the Au–Ge–Sn ternary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 481, 830-836 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.114

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}