Au–Hf system

28 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 14, model 14); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (12) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental14
model14
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction28

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdbZ. Du, L. Yang, J. Alloys Compd., 353, 213-16(2003). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(02)01293-83f1b621c7e2af58a9aab5d758f5f13092a5c8e15e07691209c4a54d47a75299fviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb3988.41AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 3.400e-4) + LIQUID#2 (x(Hf) 0.04974) + LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.45649)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1821.8AU2HF_C11B (x(Hf) 0.32404) + LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.38313) + AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.47084)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1815.44LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.23849) + AU3HF_D0A (x(Hf) 0.25) + AU2HF_C11B (x(Hf) 0.29302)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1785.98AU2HF_C11B (x(Hf) 0.32494) + AU10HF7 (x(Hf) 0.41176) + AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.46905)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1761.28AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.49981) + LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.62385) + AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1676.96AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.74973) + BCC_A2 (x(Hf) 0.87087)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1676.96AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.74978) + BCC_A2 (x(Hf) 0.87093)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1570.94LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.15423) + AU4HF (x(Hf) 0.2) + AU3HF_D0A (x(Hf) 0.25)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1570.94LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.15423) + AU4HF (x(Hf) 0.2) + AU3HF_D0A (x(Hf) 0.25)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1570.94LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.15427) + AU4HF (x(Hf) 0.2) + AU3HF_D0A (x(Hf) 0.25)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1559.13AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Hf) 0.88179) + HCP_A3 (x(Hf) 0.97148)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1559.13AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(Hf) 0.88184) + HCP_A3 (x(Hf) 0.97149)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1418.11LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.10907) + AU5HF_D1A (x(Hf) 0.15399) + AU4HF (x(Hf) 0.2)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1418.11LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.10924) + AU5HF_D1A (x(Hf) 0.15404) + AU4HF (x(Hf) 0.2)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1386.92AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.49993) + AUHF_B11 (x(Hf) 0.49993) + AUHF2 (x(Hf) 0.66667)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1373.06LIQUID (x(Hf) 0.0899) + FCC_A1 (x(Hf) 0.09286) + AU5HF_D1A (x(Hf) 0.14646)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1303.96AU10HF7 (x(Hf) 0.41176) + AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.47061) + AUHF_B11 (x(Hf) 0.47532)
AuHf-03Du-LB.tdb1303.96AU10HF7 (x(Hf) 0.41176) + AUHF_BETA (x(Hf) 0.4706) + AUHF_B11 (x(Hf) 0.47532)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Hf system (28)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2023congruent melting: liq.->βAuHfliq.: Hf 0.5; βAuHf: Hf 0.5experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report
2020congruent melting: liq.->βAuHfliq.: Hf 0.4971; βAuHf: Hf 0.4971model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
1928congruent melting: liq.->Au2Hfliq.: Hf 0.3068; Au2Hf: Hf 0.3068model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
1928congruent melting: liq.->Au2Hfliq.: Hf 0.33; Au2Hf: Hf 0.33experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
1822eutectic: liq.->Au2Hf+βAuHfliq.: Hf 0.42; Au2Hf: Hf 0.33; βAuHf: Hf 0.45experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
1822eutectic: liq.->Au2Hf+βAuHfliq.: Hf 0.3831; Au2Hf: Hf 0.324; βAuHf: Hf 0.4709model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
1816liq. + Au2Hf->Au3Hfliq.: Hf 0.2385; Au2Hf: Hf 0.293; Au3Hf: Au 0.75, Hf 0.25model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
1816liq. + Au2Hf->Au3Hfliq.: Hf 0.23; Au2Hf: Hf 0.3; Au3Hf: Au 0.75, Hf 0.25experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
1793congruent melting: liq.->AuHf2liq.: Hf 0.67; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 24
report
1793congruent melting: liq.->AuHf2liq.: Hf 0.6667; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 23
report
1786Au2Hf+βAuHf->Au10Hf7Au2Hf: Hf 0.3249; βAuHf: Hf 0.469; Au10Hf7: Au 0.588235, Hf 0.411765model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report
1786Au2Hf+βAuHf->Au10Hf7Au2Hf: Hf 0.33; βAuHf: Hf 0.45; Au10Hf7: Au 0.588235, Hf 0.411765experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
1765eutectic: liq.->βAuHf+AuHf2liq.: Hf 0.62; βAuHf: Hf 0.5; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 20
report
1761eutectic: liq.->βAuHf+AuHf2liq.: Hf 0.6239; βAuHf: Hf 0.4998; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report
1677eutectic: liq.->AuHf2+bcc(Hf)liq.: Hf 0.7498; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667; bcc(Hf): Hf 0.8709model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 25
report
1670eutectic: liq.->AuHf2+bcc(Hf)liq.: Hf 0.8; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667; bcc(Hf): Hf 0.86experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 26
report
1571liq. + Au3Hf->Au4Hfliq.: Hf 0.1542; Au3Hf: Au 0.75, Hf 0.25; Au4Hf: Au 0.8, Hf 0.2model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
1571liq. + Au3Hf->Au4Hfliq.: Hf 0.15; Au3Hf: Au 0.75, Hf 0.25; Au4Hf: Au 0.8, Hf 0.2experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
1559bcc(Hf)->AuHf2+hcp(Hf)bcc(Hf): Hf 0.8818; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667; hcp(Hf): Hf 0.9715model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 27
report
1559bcc(Hf)->AuHf2+hcp(Hf)bcc(Hf): Hf 0.89; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 28
report
1418liq. + Au4Hf->Au5Hfliq.: Hf 0.1091; Au4Hf: Au 0.8, Hf 0.2; Au5Hf: Hf 0.154model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
1418liq. + Au4Hf->Au5Hfliq.: Hf 0.1; Au4Hf: Au 0.8, Hf 0.2; Au5Hf: Hf 0.166experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
1387βAuHf+AuHf2->αAuHfβAuHf: Hf 0.5; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667; αAuHf: Hf 0.51experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 22
report
1387βAuHf+AuHf2->αAuHfβAuHf: Hf 0.4999; AuHf2: Au 0.333333, Hf 0.666667; αAuHf: Hf 0.4999model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 21
report
1373liq. + Au5Hf->fcc(Au)liq.: Hf 0.07; Au5Hf: Hf 0.14; fcc(Au): Hf 0.08experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
1373liq. + Au5Hf->fcc(Au)liq.: Hf 0.0899; Au5Hf: Hf 0.1465; fcc(Au): Hf 0.0929model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
1304βAuHf->Au10Hf7+αAuHfβAuHf: Hf 0.47; Au10Hf7: Au 0.588235, Hf 0.411765; αAuHf: Hf 0.48experimental[1] Du 2003
cites Lomello-Tafin 2000 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
1304βAuHf->Au10Hf7+αAuHfβAuHf: Hf 0.4706; Au10Hf7: Au 0.588235, Hf 0.411765; αAuHf: Hf 0.4753model[1] Du 2003Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Zhenmin Du, Lisha Yang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Au–Hf system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 353, 213-216 (2003). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(02)01293-8