Au–Lu system

22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental12
model10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction22

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AuLu-16Wan.tdbS.L. Wang, J.L. Li, L.L. Qiu, L.J. Zhou, Y.H. Li, C.Q. Ren, C.Y. Fu, Y.H. Lin, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, J. Phase Equilib Diffus., 37, 319-26(2016). doi:10.1007/s11669-016-0460-4a48c8c77ccf4a8820b7c8d325a152709628996fa8be4376aa8f529aa0a37855bviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1603.83AULU_B2 (x(Lu) 0.5) + AULU2_C37 (x(Lu) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.68255)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1603.83AULU_B2 (x(Lu) 0.5) + AULU2_C37 (x(Lu) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.68254)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1603.83AULU_B2 (x(Lu) 0.5) + AULU2_C37 (x(Lu) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.68257)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1448.9AULU2_C37 (x(Lu) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.794) + HCP_A3 (x(Lu) 1)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1448.9AULU2_C37 (x(Lu) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.79406) + HCP_A3 (x(Lu) 1)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1400.31LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.3254) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333) + AULU_B2 (x(Lu) 0.5)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1400.31LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.32553) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333) + AULU_B2 (x(Lu) 0.5)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1327.75AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.27819) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1327.75AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.27823) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1327.75AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.27832) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1301.38AU4LU_D1A (x(Lu) 0.2) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.20774) + AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1301.37AU4LU_D1A (x(Lu) 0.2) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.20751) + AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb1162.09FCC_A1 (x(Lu) 0.07866) + LIQUID (x(Lu) 0.11763) + AU4LU_D1A (x(Lu) 0.2)
AuLu-16Wan.tdb498.36AU4LU_D1A (x(Lu) 0.2) + AU3LU_D0A (x(Lu) 0.25) + AU2LU_C11B (x(Lu) 0.33333)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Lu system (22)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2053.15congruent melting: L -> AuLuL: Lu 0.5; AuLu: Lu 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites McMasters 1971
Table 4, p. 6, row 6
report
2053.15congruent melting: L -> AuLuL: Lu 0.5; AuLu: Lu 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report
2052.75congruent melting: L -> AuLuL: Lu 0.5; AuLu: Lu 0.5model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
1604.15peritectic: L + AuLu -> AuLu2L: Lu 0.682; AuLu: Lu 0.5; AuLu2: Lu 0.667model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 4
report
1604.15peritectic: L + AuLu -> AuLu2L: Lu 0.677; AuLu: Lu 0.5; AuLu2: Lu 0.667experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 3
report
1449.15eutectic: L -> (Lu) + AuLu2L: Lu 0.787; (Lu): Lu 1; AuLu2: Lu 0.667experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report
1449.15eutectic: L -> (Lu) + AuLu2L: Lu 0.794; (Lu): Lu 1; AuLu2: Lu 0.667model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
1403.15peritectic: L + AuLu -> Au2LuL: Lu 0.315; AuLu: Lu 0.5; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 8
report
1400.55peritectic: L + AuLu -> Au2LuL: Lu 0.325; AuLu: Lu 0.5; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 9
report
1355.15congruent melting: L -> Au3LuL: Lu 0.25; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 12
report
1350.15congruent melting: L -> Au3LuL: Lu 0.25; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 13
report
1327.85eutectic: L -> Au2Lu + Au3LuL: Lu 0.278; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 11
report
1320.15eutectic: L -> Au2Lu + Au3LuL: Lu 0.279; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 10
report
1303.15congruent melting: L -> Au4LuL: Lu 0.2; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 16
report
1302.65congruent melting: L -> Au4LuL: Lu 0.2; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 17
report
1301.35eutectic: L -> Au3Lu + Au4LuL: Lu 0.208; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 15
report
1297.15eutectic: L -> Au3Lu + Au4LuL: Lu 0.213; Au3Lu: Lu 0.25; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 14
report
1163.15eutectic: L -> Au4Lu + (Au)Au4Lu: Au 0.8, Lu 0.2; (Au): Lu 0.077experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Rider 1965
Table 4, p. 6, row 21
report
1162.05eutectic: L -> Au4Lu + (Au)L: Lu 0.118; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2; (Au): Lu 0.079model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 22
report
1015.15eutectic: L -> Au4Lu + (Au)L: Lu 0.114; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2; (Au): Lu 0experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 20
report
499.25eutectoid: Au3Lu -> Au2Lu + Au4LuAu3Lu: Lu 0.25; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2model[1] Wang 2016Table 4, p. 6, row 19
report
499.15eutectoid: Au3Lu -> Au2Lu + Au4LuAu3Lu: Lu 0.25; Au2Lu: Lu 0.333; Au4Lu: Lu 0.2experimental[1] Wang 2016
cites Gschneidner 1992
Table 4, p. 6, row 18
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. L. Wang, J. L. Li, L. L. Qiu, L. J. Zhou, Y. H. Li, C. Q. Ren et al., Thermodynamic Assessments of the Au-Tb and Au-Lu Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 37, 319-326 (2016). doi:10.1007/s11669-016-0460-4