Au–Nd system

107 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 36, model 71); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	36
model	71

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	72
formation	35

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
AuNd-15Wan.tdb	S.L. Wang, L.J. Zhou, Z.F. Fan, J.L. Li, Y.H. Lin, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 36, 241-47(2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0378-2	`6bf31c7211e037108261d43fe69d54775cc00e4a434924708472c230b14ef5d8`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, J. Alloys Compd., 673, 115-25(2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.170	`9c0e752aab7ca18f409a4d99444489ddbc5094144adf841fa80dc3415c106636`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
AuNd-15Wan.tdb	1337.33	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Nd) 0) + AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075)
AuNd-15Wan.tdb	1289	AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-15Wan.tdb	1128	AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075) + DHCP (x(Nd) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1528.17	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.40958) + AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857) + AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1528.17	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.40977) + AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857) + AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1528.17	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.40956) + AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857) + AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1359.97	AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.35957) + AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1359.97	AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.35953) + AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1322.87	AU51ND14 (x(Nd) 0.21538) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.27516) + AU36ND17 (x(Nd) 0.32075)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1150.88	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.12711) + AU6ND (x(Nd) 0.14286) + AU51ND14 (x(Nd) 0.19732)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1099.04	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.86741) + BCC_A2 (x(Nd) 0.99228) + DHCP (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1099.04	LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.86747) + BCC_A2 (x(Nd) 0.99228) + DHCP (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1082.9	AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5) + AUND2_C37 (x(Nd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.67997)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1068.62	FCC_A1 (x(Nd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.07802) + AU6ND (x(Nd) 0.14286)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	1068.62	FCC_A1 (x(Nd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.07798) + AU6ND (x(Nd) 0.14286)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	925.42	AUND2_C37 (x(Nd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.80405) + DHCP (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	925.42	AUND2_C37 (x(Nd) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Nd) 0.80404) + DHCP (x(Nd) 1)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	705.88	AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5) + AUND_B27 (x(Nd) 0.5) + AUND2_C37 (x(Nd) 0.66667)
AuNd-16Mou.tdb	705.88	AU4ND3 (x(Nd) 0.42857) + AUND_B27 (x(Nd) 0.5) + AUND_B2 (x(Nd) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AuNd-15Wan

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Nd system (72)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1743.55	congruent melting: L <-> γAuNd	L: Nd 0.5; γAuNd: Nd 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
1743.4	congruent melting: Liq ↔ γNdAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report
1743.15	congruent melting: L <-> γAuNd	L: Nd 0.5; γAuNd: Nd 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
1743	congruent melting: Liq ↔ γNdAu	Liq: Au 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
1743	congruent melting: Liq ↔ γNdAu	Liq: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report
1723	congruent melting: Liq ↔ γNdAu	Liq: Au 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
1633.95	polymorphic: γAuNd <-> βAuNd	γAuNd: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; βAuNd: Nd 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
1633.8	polymorphic: βNdAu ↔ γNdAu	βNdAu: Au 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
1633.15	polymorphic: γAuNd <-> βAuNd	γAuNd: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; βAuNd: Nd 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
1633	polymorphic: βNdAu ↔ γNdAu	βNdAu: Au 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
1633	polymorphic: βNdAu ↔ γNdAu	βNdAu: Au 0.5; γNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report
1523.25	peritectic: L + βAuNd <-> Au4Nd3	L: Nd 0.417; βAuNd: Nd 0.5; Au4Nd3: Nd 0.429	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
1523.15	peritectic: L + βAuNd <-> Au4Nd3	L: Nd 0.415; βAuNd: Nd 0.5; Au4Nd3: Nd 0.429	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report
1523.1	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.585; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
1523	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.591; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
1523	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.583; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 21 report
1483.55	congruent melting: L <-> Au51Nd14	L: Nd 0.215; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 22 report
1483.4	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; Nd14Au51: Au 0.784615, Nd 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 33 report
1483.15	congruent melting: L <-> Au51Nd14	L: Nd 0.215; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 21 report
1483	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; Nd14Au51: Au 0.784615, Nd 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 34 report
1483	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; Nd14Au51: Au 0.784615, Nd 0.215385	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 31 report
1452	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.785; Nd14Au51: Au 0.784615, Nd 0.215385	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 32 report
1443.95	congruent melting: L <-> Au36Nd17	L: Nd 0.321; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
1443.8	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd17Au36	Liq: Au 0.679; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679245, Nd 0.320755	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 26 report
1443.15	congruent melting: L <-> Au36Nd17	L: Nd 0.321; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
1443	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd17Au36	Liq: Au 0.679; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679245, Nd 0.320755	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 27 report
1443	congruent melting: Liq ↔ Nd17Au36	Liq: Au 0.679; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679245, Nd 0.320755	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 25 report
1356	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.64; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 22 report
1353.15	eutectic: L <-> Au4Nd3 + Au36Nd17	L: Nd 0.37; Au4Nd3: Nd 0.429; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
1353	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.63; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 24 report
1351.55	eutectic: L <-> Au4Nd3 + Au36Nd17	L: Nd 0.364; Au4Nd3: Nd 0.429; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
1351.4	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd3Au4	Liq: Au 0.636; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd3Au4: Au 0.571	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 23 report
1323.15	eutectic: L <-> Au36Nd17 + Au51Nd14	L: Nd 0.28; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report
1323	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.724; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 28 report
1323	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.72; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 30 report
1322.25	eutectic: L <-> Au36Nd17 + Au51Nd14	L: Nd 0.273; Au36Nd17: Nd 0.321; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 20 report
1322.1	Liq ↔ Nd17Au36 + Nd14Au51	Liq: Au 0.727; Nd17Au36: Au 0.679; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 29 report
1148.15	peritectic: L + Au51Nd14 <-> Au6Nd	L: Nd 0.129; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215; Au6Nd: Nd 0.143	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 24 report
1148.15	peritectic: L + Au51Nd14 <-> Au6Nd	L: Nd 0.13; Au51Nd14: Nd 0.215; Au6Nd: Nd 0.143	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 23 report
1148	Liq + Nd14Au51 ↔ NdAu6	Liq: Au 0.875; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785; NdAu6: Au 0.857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 35 report
1148	Liq + Nd14Au51 ↔ NdAu6	Liq: Au 0.87; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785; NdAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 38 report
1148	Liq + Nd14Au51 ↔ NdAu6	Liq: Au 0.871; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785; NdAu6: Au 0.857	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 37 report
1116	Liq + Nd14Au51 ↔ NdAu6	Liq: Au 0.892; Nd14Au51: Au 0.785; NdAu6: Au 0.857	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 36 report
1099	(βNd) ↔ (αNd) + liq	(βNd): Au 0.009; (αNd): Au 8.000e-4; liq: Au 0.132	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 43 report
1098.15	metatectic/catatectic: βNd <-> L + αNd	βNd: Nd 0.991; L: Nd 0.909; αNd: Nd 0.998	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
1098.15	metatectic/catatectic: βNd <-> L + αNd	βNd: Nd 0.99; L: Nd 0.9	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
1098	(βNd) ↔ (αNd) + liq	(βNd): Au 0.009; (αNd): Au 0.002; liq: Au 0.091	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 44 report
1098	(βNd) ↔ (αNd) + liq	(βNd): Au 0.01; liq: Au 0.1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 45 report
1091	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd2Au	Liq: Au 0.273; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
1085	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd2Au	Liq: Au 0.32; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd2Au: Au 0.334	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
1083.45	peritectic: L + βAuNd <-> AuNd2	L: Nd 0.715; βAuNd: Nd 0.5; AuNd2: Nd 0.667	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
1083.3	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd2Au	Liq: Au 0.285; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report
1083.15	peritectic: L + βAuNd <-> AuNd2	L: Nd 0.7; βAuNd: Nd 0.5; AuNd2: Nd 0.667	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
1083	Liq + βNdAu ↔ Nd2Au	Liq: Au 0.3; βNdAu: Au 0.5; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report
1071.15	eutectic: L <-> Au6Nd + (Au)	L: Nd 0.085; Au6Nd: Nd 0.143; (Au): Nd 0.003	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report
1071	Liq ↔ NdAu6 + Au	Liq: Au 0.915; NdAu6: Au 0.857; Au: Au 0.997	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 41 report
1069	Liq ↔ NdAu6 + Au	Liq: Au 0.905; NdAu6: Au 0.857; Au: Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 40 report
1068.15	eutectic: L <-> Au6Nd + (Au)	L: Nd 0.09; Au6Nd: Nd 0.143; (Au): Nd 0.003	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report
1068.15	eutectic: L <-> Au6Nd + (Au)	Au6Nd: Au 0.857143, Nd 0.142857	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Rider 1965	Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report
1068	Liq ↔ NdAu6 + Au	Liq: Au 0.91; NdAu6: Au 0.857; Au: Au 1	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 42 report
1067	Liq ↔ NdAu6 + Au	Liq: Au 0.922; NdAu6: Au 0.857; Au: Au 1	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 39 report
928.15	eutectic: L <-> αNd + AuNd2	L: Nd 0.826; αNd: Nd 0.998; AuNd2: Nd 0.667	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
928.15	eutectic: L <-> αNd + AuNd2	L: Nd 0.81; AuNd2: Nd 0.667	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
928	Liq ↔ Nd2Au + αNd	Liq: Au 0.19; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
928	Liq ↔ Nd2Au + αNd	Liq: Au 0.191; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
927	Liq ↔ Nd2Au + αNd	Liq: Au 0.195; Nd2Au: Au 0.333; αNd: Au 0.005	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report
924	Liq ↔ Nd2Au + αNd	Liq: Au 0.176; Nd2Au: Au 0.333	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Gschneidner 1987	Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report
703.25	polymorphic: βAuNd <-> αAuNd	βAuNd: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; αAuNd: Nd 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2015	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
703.15	polymorphic: βAuNd <-> αAuNd	βAuNd: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5; αAuNd: Nd 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2015 cites Saccone 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
703.1	polymorphic: αNdAu ↔ βNdAu	αNdAu: Au 0.5; βNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
703	polymorphic: αNdAu ↔ βNdAu	αNdAu: Au 0.5; βNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
703	polymorphic: αNdAu ↔ βNdAu	αNdAu: Au 0.5; βNdAu: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	experimental	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Saccone doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Au–Nd system (19)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Nd14Au51	Au51Nd14	-55.78 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.227 (mp-aaacrmbi)		[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 16 report
Nd14Au51	Au51Nd14	-51.93 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-61.227 (mp-aaacrmbi)		[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 17 report
Nd14Au51	Au51Nd14	-49.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.9	298.15	experimental	-61.227 (mp-aaacrmbi)		[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1994 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 15 report
Nd17Au36	Au36Nd17	-67.5 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-74.055 (mp-aaabghqg)		[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report
Nd17Au36	Au36Nd17	-60.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.7	298.15	experimental	-74.055 (mp-aaabghqg)		[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1994 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report
Nd17Au36	Au36Nd17	-60.63 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-74.055 (mp-aaabghqg)		[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
Nd2Au	AuNd2	-57.2 kJ/mol-atom		model	-53.288 (mp-aaacksik)	-53.295 (oqmd-1520685)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Nd2Au	AuNd2	-53.8 kJ/mol-atom		model	-53.288 (mp-aaacksik)	-53.295 (oqmd-1520685)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Nd3Au4	Au4Nd3	-74.7 kJ/mol-atom		model	-78.03 (mp-aaaaasxw)	-78.132 (oqmd-94716)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
Nd3Au4	Au4Nd3	-69 kJ/mol-atom		model	-78.03 (mp-aaaaasxw)	-78.132 (oqmd-94716)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
NdAu6	Au6Nd	-47.15 kJ/mol-atom		model	-40.08 (mp-aaackvxt)	-40.607 (oqmd-1821061)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 19 report
NdAu6	Au6Nd	-44.3 kJ/mol-atom		model	-40.08 (mp-aaackvxt)	-40.607 (oqmd-1821061)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 18 report
αNdAu	AuNd	-79.1 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
αNdAu	AuNd	-74 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
αNdAu	AuNd	-70.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.7	298.15	experimental	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1994 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
βNdAu	AuNd	-79 kJ/mol-atom		model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
βNdAu	AuNd	-73.8 kJ/mol-atom		model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report
γNdAu	AuNd	-76.9 kJ/mol-atom		model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report
γNdAu	AuNd	-73.8 kJ/mol-atom		model	-77.988 (mp-aaacjmrt)	-78.106 (oqmd-28191)	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report

Other properties

Formation (16)

Formation, Au–Nd system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	0.709 J/mol-atom/K		Nd2Au alloy: Au 0.333, Nd 0.667	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-6.81 J/mol-atom/K		Nd2Au alloy: Au 0.333, Nd 0.667	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-2.5 J/mol-atom/K		Nd3Au4 alloy: Au 0.571, Nd 0.429	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	2.9496 J/mol-atom/K		Nd3Au4 alloy: Au 0.571, Nd 0.429	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-11.5 J/mol-atom/K		NdAu6 alloy: Au 0.857, Nd 0.143	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 19 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-3.01 J/mol-atom/K		NdAu6 alloy: Au 0.857, Nd 0.143	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 18 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-4.36 J/mol-atom/K		βNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	0.2224 J/mol-atom/K		βNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	1.5076 J/mol-atom/K		γNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-4.36 J/mol-atom/K		γNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	3.15 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Nd14Au51 alloy: Au 0.785, Nd 0.215	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 16 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-2.76 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Nd14Au51 alloy: Au 0.785, Nd 0.215	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 17 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-0.74 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Nd17Au36 alloy: Au 0.679, Nd 0.321	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	5.332 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Nd17Au36 alloy: Au 0.679, Nd 0.321	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	-4.7 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf°	0.08 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	αNdAu alloy: Au 0.5, Nd 0.5	model	[2] Moustaine 2016 cites Wang 2015 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

S. L. Wang, L. J. Zhou, Z. F. Lan, J. L. Li, Y. H. Lin, C. P. Wang et al., Thermodynamic Assessments of the Au-Nd and Au-Dy Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 36, 241-247 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11669-015-0378-2
D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the neodymium–gold binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 673, 115-125 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.170

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}