Au–Si–Sn system

21 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 8, model 13); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	8
model	13

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	21

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Si–Sn system (21)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
763	quasi-peritectic: L + β -> (Au) + ζ	L: Au 0.777	experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report
746	quasi-peritectic: L + β -> (Au) + ζ	L: Au 0.792, Si 0.062	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
691.6	other: L -> (Si) + AuSn		experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 4 report
691.5	other: L -> (Si) + AuSn	L: Si 0.001	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 3 report
629.7	quasi-peritectic: L + (Au) -> (Si) + ζ	L: Au 0.756	experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
629	quasi-peritectic: L + (Au) -> (Si) + ζ	L: Au 0.78, Si 0.161	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
587.6	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn -> (Si) + AuSn2		experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
583.7	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn -> (Si) + AuSn2	L: Au 0.277	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
583.7	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn -> (Si) + AuSn2		model	[1] Meng 2007 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 9 report
549	eutectic: L -> (Si) + ζ + AuSn	L: Au 0.698, Si 0.009	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
546.5	eutectic: L -> (Si) + ζ + AuSn	L: Au 0.71	experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 11 report
525	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn2 -> (Si) + AuSn4	L: Au 0.113	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report
525	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn2 -> (Si) + AuSn4		model	[1] Meng 2007 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 14 report
524	quasi-peritectic: L + AuSn2 -> (Si) + AuSn4		experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 13 report
506	quasi-peritectic: (Au) + ζ -> β + (Si)		model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 15 report
488.1	eutectic: L -> (Si) + (Sn) + AuSn4		model	[1] Meng 2007 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 18 report
488.1	eutectic: L -> (Si) + (Sn) + AuSn4	L: Au 0.046	model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 16 report
487.3	eutectic: L -> (Si) + (Sn) + AuSn4		experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 17 report
451	quasi-peritectic: ζ + AuSn -> γ + (Si)		model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 19 report
448	quasi-peritectic: ζ + AuSn -> γ + (Si)		experimental	[1] Meng 2007 cites Legendre 1985	Table 3, p. 4, row 20 report
301	quasi-peritectic: β + (Si) -> (Au) + ζ		model	[1] Meng 2007	Table 3, p. 4, row 21 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

F.G. Meng, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic description of the Au–Si–Sn system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 431, 292-297 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.066

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}