Au–Tb system

70 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 42, model 28); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 12 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	42
model	28

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	59
phase transition	11

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	S. Otmani, K. Mahdouk, J. Alloys Compd., 670, 369-73(2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.260	`3d40e677f0e61d9c17ca821ab33d8859261851630a2070944aeb1217194a1c4e`	viewer · TDB · JSON
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	S.L. Wang, J.L. Li, L.L. Qiu, L.J. Zhou, Y.H. Li, C.Q. Ren, C.Y. Fu, Y.H. Lin, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, J. Phase Equilib Diffus., 37, 319-26(2016). doi:10.1007/s11669-016-0460-4	`79c53dab2d6a949a841276ed22a5de065368aa7860544d70f1f227a1e97270cf`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1731.41	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB_B2 (x(Tb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.57951)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1731.41	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.42522) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB_B2 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1614.02	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.39848) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1614.02	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.39852) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1561.92	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.9695) + BCC_A2 (x(Tb) 0.99882) + HCP_A3 (x(Tb) 0.99884)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1521.82	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36872) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1521.82	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.3687) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1521.82	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36879) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1493.32	AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36063) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1493.32	AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36058) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1432.75	AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.28833) + AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1432.75	AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.28835) + AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1387.77	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.19854) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538) + AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1387.77	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.19862) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538) + AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1267.09	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.66995)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1267.08	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.67031)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1150.69	AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.79374) + HCP_A3 (x(Tb) 0.98399)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1120.77	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.11579) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1120.77	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.11609) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1120.77	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.11574) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1072.01	FCC_A1 (x(Tb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.07845) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1072.01	FCC_A1 (x(Tb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.07839) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286)
AuTb-16Otm.tdb	1072.01	FCC_A1 (x(Tb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.07828) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1723.29	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB_B2 (x(Tb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.58243)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1723.29	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.43043) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB_B2 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1613.29	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.40822) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1613.29	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.40831) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857) + AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1483.48	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.37258) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1483.48	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.37255) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1483.48	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.37262) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176) + AU4TB3 (x(Tb) 0.42857)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1483.16	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.94052) + BCC_A2 (x(Tb) 0.98741) + HCP_A3 (x(Tb) 0.99881)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1472.78	AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36974) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1472.78	AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.36971) + AU10TB7 (x(Tb) 0.41176)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1445.8	AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.2154) + AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1445.8	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.21537) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538) + AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1435.23	AU3TB_D0A (x(Tb) 0.25) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.2884) + AU2TB_C11B (x(Tb) 0.33333)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1272.88	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.70023)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1272.88	AUTB_B33 (x(Tb) 0.5) + AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.69986)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1152.91	AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.8135) + HCP_A3 (x(Tb) 0.99604)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1152.91	AUTB2_C37 (x(Tb) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.81345) + HCP_A3 (x(Tb) 0.99604)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1130.73	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.12137) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1130.73	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.12141) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1130.73	LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.12137) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286) + AU51TB14 (x(Tb) 0.21538)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1077.25	FCC_A1 (x(Tb) 0.02096) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.09513) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286)
AuTb-16Wan.tdb	1077.25	FCC_A1 (x(Tb) 0.02095) + LIQUID (x(Tb) 0.0951) + AU6TB (x(Tb) 0.14286)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AuTb-16Wan

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Tb system (59)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1896.15	congruent melting: L <-> βAuTb	L: Tb 0.5; βAuTb: Tb 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites McMasters 1971	Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report
1863.15	congruent melting: L <-> βAuTb	L: Tb 0.5; βAuTb: Tb 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report
1862.55	congruent melting: L <-> βAuTb	L: Tb 0.5; βAuTb: Tb 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report
1723.25	polymorphic: βAuTb <-> αAuTb	βAuTb: Tb 0.5; αAuTb: Au 0.5, Tb 0.5	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report
1723.15	polymorphic: βAuTb <-> αAuTb	βAuTb: Tb 0.5; αAuTb: Au 0.5, Tb 0.5	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report
1628	peritectic: L+αTbAu⇔Tb3Au4	αTbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 36 report
1613.25	peritectic: L + αAuTb <-> Au4Tb3	L: Tb 0.408; αAuTb: Tb 0.5; Au4Tb3: Tb 0.429	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 13 report
1613.15	peritectic: L + αAuTb <-> Au4Tb3	L: Tb 0.41; αAuTb: Tb 0.5; Au4Tb3: Tb 0.429	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report
1613	peritectic: L + αTbAu -> Tb3Au4	L: Tb 0.4; αTbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
1613	peritectic: L + αTbAu -> Tb3Au4	L: Tb 0.41; αTbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report
1562	metatectic/catatectic: (βTb) -> (αTb) + L	L: Tb 0.975	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
1538.15	congruent melting: L <-> Au2Tb	L: Tb 0.333; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 18 report
1538.05	congruent melting: L <-> Au2Tb	L: Tb 0.333; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 19 report
1498	peritectic: L+Tb3Au4⇔Tb7Au10	L: Tb 0.25; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571; Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 23 report
1496	peritectic: L + Tb3Au4 -> Tb7Au10	L: Tb 0.37; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571; Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
1492	eutectic: L -> Tb7Au10 + TbAu2	L: Tb 0.362; Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
1488.65	congruent melting: L <-> Au3Tb	L: Tb 0.25; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 23 report
1488.15	congruent melting: L <-> Au3Tb	L: Tb 0.25; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 22 report
1483.25	peritectic: L + Au4Tb3 <-> Au10Tb7	L: Tb 0.373; Au4Tb3: Tb 0.429; Au10Tb7: Tb 0.412	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 15 report
1483.15	metatectic/catatectic: (βTb) <-> (αTb) + L	(βTb): Tb 0.987; (αTb): Tb 0.999; L: Tb 0.941	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
1483.15	metatectic/catatectic: (βTb) <-> (αTb) + L	(βTb): Tb 0.975; L: Tb 0.915	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
1483.15	peritectic: L + Au4Tb3 <-> Au10Tb7	L: Tb 0.38; Au4Tb3: Tb 0.429; Au10Tb7: Tb 0.412	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 14 report
1483	metatectic/catatectic: (βTb) -> (αTb) + L	L: Tb 0.975	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
1483	eutectic: L⇔Tb7Au10+TbAu2	Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 37 report
1483	peritectic: L + Tb3Au4 -> Tb7Au10	L: Tb 0.38; Tb3Au4: Tb 0.428571; Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
1472.75	eutectic: L <-> Au10Tb7 + Au2Tb	L: Tb 0.37; Au10Tb7: Tb 0.412; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 17 report
1468.15	eutectic: L <-> Au10Tb7 + Au2Tb	L: Tb 0.375; Au10Tb7: Tb 0.412; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 16 report
1468	eutectic: L -> Tb7Au10 + TbAu2	L: Tb 0.375; Tb7Au10: Tb 0.411765; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
1448.15	peritectic: L + Au3Tb <-> Au51Tb14	L: Tb 0.21; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25; Au51Tb14: Tb 0.2154	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 24 report
1448	peritectic: L + TbAu3 -> Tb14Au51	L: Tb 0.21; TbAu3: Tb 0.25; Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report
1445.55	peritectic: L + Au3Tb <-> Au51Tb14	L: Tb 0.2153; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25; Au51Tb14: Tb 0.2154	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 25 report
1443	eutectic: L⇔TbAu2+TbAu3	TbAu2: Tb 0.333333; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 39 report
1435.35	eutectic: L <-> Au2Tb + Au3Tb	L: Tb 0.288; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report
1435	eutectic: L -> TbAu2 + TbAu3	L: Tb 0.29; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 22 report
1433.15	eutectic: L <-> Au2Tb + Au3Tb	L: Tb 0.29; Au2Tb: Tb 0.333; Au3Tb: Tb 0.25	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 20 report
1433	eutectic: L -> TbAu2 + TbAu3	L: Tb 0.29; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 21 report
1388	peritectic: L+TbAu3⇔Tb14Au51	TbAu3: Tb 0.25; Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 42 report
1376	peritectic: L + TbAu3 -> Tb14Au51	L: Tb 0.2; TbAu3: Tb 0.25; Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report
1273.25	peritectic: L + αAuTb <-> AuTb2	L: Tb 0.7; αAuTb: Tb 0.5; AuTb2: Tb 0.667	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
1273.15	peritectic: L + αAuTb <-> AuTb2	L: Tb 0.71; αAuTb: Tb 0.5; AuTb2: Tb 0.667	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
1273	peritectic: L+TbAu⇔Tb2Au	TbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 34 report
1273	peritectic: L + TbAu -> Tb2Au	L: Tb 0.71; TbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
1270	peritectic: L + TbAu -> Tb2Au	L: Tb 0.672; TbAu: Tb 0.5; Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
1163	eutectic: L⇔(αTb)+Tb2Au	Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 33 report
1153.15	eutectic: L <-> (αTb) + AuTb2	L: Tb 0.814; (αTb): Tb 0.996; AuTb2: Tb 0.667	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
1153.15	eutectic: L <-> (αTb) + AuTb2	L: Tb 0.8; AuTb2: Tb 0.667	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
1153	eutectic: L -> (αTb) + Tb2Au	L: Tb 0.8; Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
1153	eutectic: L -> (αTb) + Tb2Au	L: Tb 0.795; Tb2Au: Tb 0.666667	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
1129.65	peritectic: L + Au51Tb14 <-> Au6Tb	L: Tb 0.121; Au51Tb14: Tb 0.215; Au6Tb: Tb 0.143	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 27 report
1128.15	peritectic: L + Au51Tb14 <-> Au6Tb	L: Tb 0.12; Au51Tb14: Tb 0.215; Au6Tb: Tb 0.143	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 26 report
1128	peritectic: L + Tb14Au51 -> TbAu6	L: Tb 0.12; Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385; TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report
1121	peritectic: L + Tb14Au51 -> TbAu6	L: Tb 0.12; Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385; TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 28 report
1082.15	eutectic: L <-> Au6Tb + (Au)	Au6Tb: Au 0.857143, Tb 0.142857; (Au): Tb 0.015	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Rider 1965	Table 2, p. 3, row 29 report
1078.15	eutectic: L <-> Au6Tb + (Au)	L: Tb 0.11; Au6Tb: Tb 0.143; (Au): Tb 0.015	experimental	[1] Wang 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 28 report
1078	eutectic: L -> TbAu6 + (Au)	L: Tb 0.11; TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 29 report
1076.65	eutectic: L <-> Au6Tb + (Au)	L: Tb 0.095; Au6Tb: Tb 0.143; (Au): Tb 0.021	model	[1] Wang 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 30 report
1075	eutectic: L -> TbAu6 + (Au)	L: Tb 0.09; TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 30 report
1033	peritectic: L+Tb14Au51⇔TbAu6	Tb14Au51: Tb 0.215385; TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 43 report
1023	eutectic: L⇔TbAu6+(Au)	TbAu6: Tb 0.142857	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 44 report

Other properties

Phase transition (11)

Phase transition, Au–Tb system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase transition	1337 K	1337	congruent melting: L -> (Au) L: Tb 0	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 32 report
Phase transition	1337 K	1337	congruent melting: L -> (Au) L: Tb 0	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 31 report
Phase transition	1484 K	1484	congruent melting: L -> TbAu3 L: Tb 0.25; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 24 report
Phase transition	1488 K	1488	congruent melting: L⇔TbAu3 L: Tb 0.25; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 40 report
Phase transition	1498 K	1498	congruent melting: L⇔TbAu3 L: Tb 0.25; TbAu3: Tb 0.25	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 41 report
Phase transition	1530 K	1530	congruent melting: L -> TbAu2 L: Tb 0.333; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 20 report
Phase transition	1538 K	1538	congruent melting: L -> TbAu2 L: Tb 0.333; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report
Phase transition	1553 K	1553	congruent melting: L⇔TbAu2 L: Tb 0.333333; TbAu2: Tb 0.333333	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 38 report
Phase transition	1863 K	1863	congruent melting: L -> βTbAu L: Tb 0.5; βTbAu: Tb 0.5	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
Phase transition	1863 K	1863	congruent melting: L⇔βTbAu L: Tb 0.5; βTbAu: Tb 0.5	experimental	[2] Otmani 2016 cites Saccone 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 35 report
Phase transition	1866 K	1866	congruent melting: L -> βTbAu L: Tb 0.5; βTbAu: Tb 0.5	model	[2] Otmani 2016	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

S. L. Wang, J. L. Li, L. L. Qiu, L. J. Zhou, Y. H. Li, C. Q. Ren et al., Thermodynamic Assessments of the Au-Tb and Au-Lu Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 37, 319-326 (2016). doi:10.1007/s11669-016-0460-4
Samira Otmani, Kamal Mahdouk, Thermodynamic assessment of the terbium–gold binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 670, 369-373 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.260

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}