B–C–Ti system

32 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 18, unspecified 2); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	12
model	18
unspecified	2

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	28
crystal structure	4

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–C–Ti system (28)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
3046.15	eutectic: L -> TiC1-x + C	L: C 0.651; TiC1-x: C 0.485; C: C 1	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Jonsson 1992	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
2916.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + TiC1-x	L: B 0.339, C 0.22, Ti 0.441; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; TiC1-x: B 0.032, C 0.427, Ti 0.541	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 2 report
2893.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + TiC1-x	L: B 0.31, C 0.24, Ti 0.45; TiB2: B 0.63, Ti 0.34; TiC1-x: B 0.06, C 0.41, Ti 0.53	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 1 report
2780.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + C	L: B 0.45, C 0.32, Ti 0.23; TiB2: B 0.64, Ti 0.34; C: B 0.02	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 3 report
2729.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + C	L: B 0.446, C 0.332, Ti 0.222; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; C: B 0.007, C 0.993, Ti 0	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 4 report
2673.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + TiC1-x + C	L: B 0.37, C 0.34, Ti 0.29; TiB2: B 0.64, Ti 0.34; TiC1-x: B 0.02, C 0.46, Ti 0.52	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 5 report
2667.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + TiC1-x + C	L: B 0.335, C 0.377, Ti 0.288; TiB2: B 0.333, C 0, Ti 0.667; TiC1-x: B 0.006, C 0.482, Ti 0.512; C: B 0.003, C 0.997, Ti 0	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 6 report
2654.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + B4C	L: B 0.811, C 0.11, Ti 0.079; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; B4C: B 0.855, C 0.145, Ti 0	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 8 report
2648.15	eutectic: L -> B4C + C	L: C 0.291; B4C: C 0.185; C: C 0.982	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Kasper 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
2583.15	other: L <-> TiB2 + B4C	L: B 0.8, C 0.15, Ti 0.05; TiB2: B 0.65; B4C: B 0.82, C 0.17	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 7 report
2519.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + B4C + C	L: B 0.641, C 0.26, Ti 0.099; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; B4C: B 0.814, C 0.186, Ti 0; C: B 0.98, C 0.02, Ti 0	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 10 report
2513.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + B4C + C	L: B 0.62, C 0.28, Ti 0.1; TiB2: Ti 0.34; B4C: B 0.8; C: B 0.03	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 9 report
2471.15	peritectic: L + TiB2 -> Ti3B4	L: B 0.377; TiB2: B 0.667; Ti3B4: B 0.571	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Baetzner 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
2457.15	peritectic: L + Ti3B4 -> TiB	L: B 0.374; Ti3B4: B 0.571; TiB: B 0.5	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Baetzner 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
2453.15	quasi-peritectic: L + TiB2 <-> Ti3B4 + TiC1-x	L: B 0.345, C 0.075, Ti 0.58; TiB2: Ti 0.34; Ti3B4: B 0.57, C 0, Ti 0.43; TiC1-x: B 0.04, C 0.32, Ti 0.64	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 11 report
2433.15	quasi-peritectic: L + Ti3B4 <-> TiB + TiC1-x	L: B 0.34, C 0.07, Ti 0.59; Ti3B4: B 0.57, C 0, Ti 0.43; TiB: B 0.48, Ti 0.5; TiC1-x: B 0.04, C 0.32, Ti 0.64	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 13 report
2394.15	quasi-peritectic: L + TiB2 <-> Ti3B4 + TiC1-x	L: B 0.312, C 0.044, Ti 0.644; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; Ti3B4: B 0.571, C 0, Ti 0.429; TiC1-x: B 0.052, C 0.323, Ti 0.625	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 12 report
2386.15	quasi-peritectic: L + Ti3B4 <-> TiB + TiC1-x	L: B 0.31, C 0.044, Ti 0.646; Ti3B4: B 0.571, C 0, Ti 0.429; TiB: B 0.5, C 0, Ti 0.5; TiC1-x: B 0.323, C 0.051, Ti 0.626	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 14 report
2346.15	eutectic: L -> B + B4C	L: C 0.002; B: C 0; B4C: C 0.081	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Kasper 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
2332.15	eutectic: L -> TiB2 + B	L: B 0.981; TiB2: B 0.667; B: B 1	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Baetzner 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
2331.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + B4C + B	L: B 0.979, C 0.002, Ti 0.019; TiB2: B 0.667, C 0, Ti 0.333; B4C: B 0.919, C 0.081, Ti 0; B: B 1, C 0, Ti 0	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 16 report
2289.15	eutectic: L <-> TiB2 + B4C + B	L: B 0.97, C 0.015, Ti 0.015; TiB2: B 0.66, C 0.01, Ti 0.33; B4C: C 0.11; B: B 0.99	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 15 report
1925.15	eutectic: L -> βTi + TiC1-x	L: C 0.031; βTi: C 0.026; TiC1-x: C 0.313	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Jonsson 1992	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
1814.15	eutectic: L -> βTi + TiB	L: B 0.069; βTi: B 0.002; TiB: B 0.5	model	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites Baetzner 1994	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
1808.15	eutectic: L <-> betaTi + TiB + TiC1-x	L: B 0.066, C 0.022, Ti 0.912; betaTi: B 0.001, C 0.021, Ti 0.978; TiB: B 0.5, C 0, Ti 0.5; TiC1-x: B 0.017, C 0.302, Ti 0.681; βTi: B 0.001, C 0.021, Ti 0.978	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 18 report
1783.15	eutectic: L <-> betaTi + TiB + TiC1-x	L: B 0.05, C 0.02, Ti 0.93; betaTi: B 0.01, C 0.01; TiB: Ti 0.51; TiC1-x: B 0.02, C 0.3, Ti 0.68; βTi: B 0.01, C 0.01	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 17 report
1200.15	quasi-peritectic: betaTi + TiC1-x <-> TiB + alphaTi	betaTi: B 0.001, C 0.004, Ti 0.995; TiC1-x: B 0.001, C 0.344, Ti 0.655; TiB: B 0.5, C 0, Ti 0.5; alphaTi: B 0, C 0.021, Ti 0.979; βTi: B 0.001, C 0.004, Ti 0.995; αTi: B 0, C 0.021, Ti 0.979	model	[1] Duschanek 1995	Table 4, p. 8, row 20 report
1163.15	quasi-peritectic: betaTi + TiC1-x <-> TiB + alphaTi		experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 66Rud	Table 4, p. 8, row 19 report

Other properties

Crystal structure (4)

Crystal structure, B–C–Ti system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	8.876 Å	298.15	Ti1.86B48C2 alloy: C 0.038565, Ti 0.035866	unspecified	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 80Amb	Table 3, p. 4, row 67 report
Lattice a	8.876 Å	298.15	Ti1.86B48C2 alloy: C 0.038565, Ti 0.035866	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 80Amb	Table 3, p. 5, row 39 report
Lattice c	5.062 Å	298.15	Ti1.86B48C2 alloy: C 0.038565, Ti 0.035866	unspecified	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 80Amb	Table 3, p. 4, row 67 report
Lattice c	5.062 Å	298.15	Ti1.86B48C2 alloy: C 0.038565, Ti 0.035866	experimental	[1] Duschanek 1995 cites ref. 80Amb	Table 3, p. 5, row 39 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

H. Duschanek, P. Rogl, H. L. Lukas, A critical assessment and thermodynamic calculation of the boron-carbon-titanium (B-C-Ti) ternary system, JPE 16, 46-60 (1995). doi:10.1007/bf02646248

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}