B–Cd–Sr–Ti–V system

17 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 8, model 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	8
model	9

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	17

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Cd–Sr–Ti–V system (17)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2347.85	Gas+Liquid(B) -> (βB)	Gas: Cd 1; Liquid(B): Cd 0; (βB): Cd 2.000e-4	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 29 report
2182.95	Gas+Liquid(V) -> (V)	Gas: Cd 1; Liquid(V): Cd 0; (V): Cd 3.000e-5	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 32 report
1123.15	Liquid+(βTi) -> Ti2Cd		experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Robertson 1972 doi	Table 4, p. 5, row 20 report
1040.75	Gas+(βB) -> Liquid(Cd)	Gas: Cd 1; (βB): Cd 0; Liquid(Cd): Cd 0.987	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 28 report
873.15	Liquid+Sr13Cd58 -> SrCd6	Liquid: Cd 0.8571; Sr13Cd58: Cd 0.8169; SrCd6: Cd 0.8571; L: Cd 0.8571	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report
872.75	Liquid -> Sr13Cd58+SrCd2	Liquid: Cd 0.7738; Sr13Cd58: Cd 0.8169; SrCd2: Cd 0.6667; L: Cd 0.7738	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report
871.15	Liquid+Sr13Cd58 -> SrCd6	Liquid: Cd 0.8573; Sr13Cd58: Cd 0.8169; SrCd6: Cd 0.8571; L: Cd 0.8573	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report
870.15	Liquid -> Sr13Cd58+SrCd2	Liquid: Cd 0.765; Sr13Cd58: Cd 0.8169; SrCd2: Cd 0.6667; L: Cd 0.765	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report
853.15	Liquid+SrCd2 -> SrCd	Liquid: Cd 0.5; SrCd2: Cd 0.6667; SrCd: Cd 0.5; L: Cd 0.5	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report
848.75	Liquid+SrCd2 -> SrCd	Liquid: Cd 0.4998; SrCd2: Cd 0.6667; SrCd: Cd 0.5; L: Cd 0.4998	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report
804.15	Liquid+SrCd6 -> SrCd11	Liquid: Cd 0.9167; SrCd6: Cd 0.8571; SrCd11: Cd 0.9167; L: Cd 0.9167	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report
804.05	Liquid+SrCd6 -> SrCd11	Liquid: Cd 0.9169; SrCd6: Cd 0.8571; SrCd11: Cd 0.9167; L: Cd 0.9169	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report
714.15	Liquid+SrCd -> Sr5Cd3		experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Druska 1994	Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report
703.15	Liquid+SrCd -> Sr5Cd3	Liquid: Cd 0.3; SrCd: Cd 0.5; Sr5Cd3: Cd 0.375; L: Cd 0.3	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report
702.75	Liquid+SrCd -> Sr5Cd3	Liquid: Cd 0.2629; SrCd: Cd 0.5; Sr5Cd3: Cd 0.375; L: Cd 0.2629	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report
657.25	Liquid -> Sr5Cd3+(αSr)	Liquid: Cd 0.1967; Sr5Cd3: Cd 0.375; (αSr): Cd 0; L: Cd 0.1967	model	[1] Zhang 2013	Table 4, p. 5, row 19 report
657.15	Liquid -> Sr5Cd3+(αSr)	Liquid: Cd 0.2; Sr5Cd3: Cd 0.375; (αSr): Cd 0; L: Cd 0.2	experimental	[1] Zhang 2013 cites Koster 1965	Table 4, p. 5, row 18 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Cong Zhang, Kaiming Cheng, Weiwei Wang, Xi Li, Biao Hu, Shuhong Liu et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Cd–X (X= Sr, Ti, B, V) systems, Calphad 42, 6-12 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.005

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}