B–Ce system

126 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 62, model 44, DFT 8, unspecified 12); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental62
model44
DFT8
unspecified12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction67
phase transition19
phase equilibrium13
formation21
crystal structure6

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CeB-13Wan · CALPHAD hull CeB-17Pre

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Ce system (67)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2818.15congruent melting: L -> B6CeL: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Stecher 1965
Table 2, p. 2, row 9
report
2648.15peritectic: L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.744; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Stecher 1965
Table 2, p. 2, row 20
report
2643.15peritectic: L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.742; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Benesovsky 1967
Table 2, p. 2, row 19
report
2604.95congruent melting: L -> B6CeL: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 5
report
2603.15congruent melting: L -> B6CeL: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 6
report
2603.15congruent melting: L -> B6CeL: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 8
report
2473.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.99; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Stecher 1965
Table 2, p. 2, row 25
report
2463.15congruent melting: L -> B6Ceexperimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Samsonov 1961
Table 2, p. 2, row 10
report
2438.15peritectic: L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.74; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 18
report
2438.15peritectic: L+B6Ce->B4CeL: B 0.74; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
2438.15L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.74; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 16
report
2438peritectic: L + CeB6 -> CeB4L: B 0.74; CeB6: B 0.857143; CeB4: B 0.8experimental[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 7, p. 29, row 6
report
2438peritectic: L + CeB6 -> CeB4L: B 0.74; CeB6: B 0.857143; CeB4: B 0.8unspecified[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 24
Table 7, p. 29, row 7
report
2437.95peritectic: L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.744; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 17
report
2437.95peritectic: L+B6Ce->B4CeL: B 0.744; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
2437.95L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.744; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 15
report
2435peritectic: L + CeB6 -> CeB4L: B 0.74; CeB6: B 0.857143; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020Table 7, p. 29, row 10
report
2433.95L + B6Ce -> B4CeL: B 0.7407; B6Ce: B 0.857; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 14
report
2433.8peritectic: L + CeB6 -> CeB4L: B 0.741; CeB6: B 0.857143; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 7, p. 29, row 9
report
2298.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.99; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Spear 1976
Table 2, p. 2, row 24
report
2278.4eutectic: L -> CeB6 + β-BL: B 0.967; CeB6: B 0.857143; β-B: B 1model[3] Li 2020Table 7, p. 29, row 15
report
2273.15eutectic: L->B6Ce+(βB)L: B 0.967; B6Ce: B 0.857; (βB): B 1model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
2273.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.967; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 20
report
2273.15eutectic: L->B6Ce+(βB)L: B 0.96; B6Ce: B 0.857; (βB): B 1experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Seybolt 1960
Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
2273.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.96; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Seybolt 1960
Table 2, p. 2, row 22
report
2273.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.967; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 23
report
2273.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.96; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Seybolt 1960
Table 7, p. 9, row 19
report
2273eutectic: L -> CeB6 + β-BL: B 0.99; CeB6: B 0.857143; β-B: B 1experimental[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 7, p. 29, row 11
report
2273eutectic: L -> CeB6 + β-BL: B 0.967; CeB6: B 0.857143; β-B: B 1model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 7, p. 29, row 13
report
2270.85eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.964; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 17
report
2270.7eutectic: L -> CeB6 + β-BL: B 0.964; CeB6: B 0.857143; β-B: B 1model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 7, p. 29, row 14
report
2263.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.99; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 18
report
2263.15eutectic: L -> B6Ce + β(B)L: B 0.99; B6Ce: B 0.857; β(B): B 1experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 21
report
2263.15eutectic: L->B6Ce+(βB)L: B 0.99; B6Ce: B 0.857; (βB): B 1experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
2263eutectic: L -> CeB6 + β-BL: B 0.99; CeB6: B 0.857143; β-B: B 1unspecified[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 24
Table 7, p. 29, row 12
report
2237.8peritectic: L + CeB6 -> CeB4L: B 0.744; CeB6: B 0.857143; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 7, p. 29, row 8
report
1071.95congruent melting: L -> δ(Ce)L: B 0; δ(Ce): B 0model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 1
report
1071.15eutectic: L -> B4Ce + δ(Ce)L: B 0.01; B4Ce: B 0.8; δ(Ce): B 0experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 16
report
1071.15congruent melting: L -> δ(Ce)L: B 0; δ(Ce): B 0unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
1071.15congruent melting: L -> δ(Ce)L: B 0; δ(Ce): B 0experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Massalski 1990
Table 7, p. 9, row 2
report
1063.45eutectic: L -> B4Ce + δ(Ce)L: B 0.006; B4Ce: B 0.8; δ(Ce): B 0model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 15
report
1063.45eutectic: L->(δCe)+B4CeL: B 0.006; (δCe): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
1063.45eutectic: L -> δ(Ce) + B4CeL: B 0.006; δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 13
report
1063.3eutectic: L -> δ-Ce + CeB4L: B 0.006; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 7, p. 29, row 19
report
1063.15eutectic: L->(δCe)+B4CeL: B 0.01; (δCe): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Brewer 1951 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
1063.15eutectic: L -> δ(Ce) + B4CeL: B 0.01; δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1990
Table 7, p. 9, row 12
report
1063.15eutectic: L -> B4Ce + δ(Ce)L: B 0.01; B4Ce: B 0.8; δ(Ce): B 0unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1990
Table 2, p. 2, row 14
report
1063.15eutectic: L->(δCe)+B4CeL: B 0.01; (δCe): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
1063eutectic: L -> δ-Ce + CeB4L: B 0.01; CeB4: B 0.8experimental[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 7, p. 29, row 16
report
1063eutectic: L -> δ-Ce + CeB4L: B 0.01; CeB4: B 0.8unspecified[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 24
Table 7, p. 29, row 17
report
1061.95eutectic: L -> δ(Ce) + B4CeL: B 0.005; δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 10
report
1061.8eutectic: L -> δ-Ce + CeB4L: B 0.01; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 7, p. 29, row 18
report
1058.3eutectic: L -> δ-Ce + CeB4L: B 0.006; CeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020Table 7, p. 29, row 20
report
1058.15eutectic: L -> B4Ce + δ(Ce)L: B 0.01; B4Ce: B 0.8; δ(Ce): B 0experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Brewer 1951
Table 2, p. 2, row 13
report
1058.15eutectic: L -> δ(Ce) + B4CeL: B 0.01; δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Brewer 1951
Table 7, p. 9, row 11
report
1000δ(Ce) + B4Ce -> γ(Ce)δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017Table 7, p. 9, row 7
report
999.95peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce -> γ(Ce)δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 12
report
999.95peritectic: L+(δCe)->(γCe)L: B 0.001; (δCe): B 0; (γCe): B 0model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
999.95δ(Ce) + B4Ce -> γ(Ce)δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8model[1] Premović 2017
cites Wang 2013 doi
Table 7, p. 9, row 9
report
999.9eutectoid: δ-Ce + CeB4 -> γ-CeCeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 7, p. 29, row 24
report
999.8eutectoid: δ-Ce + CeB4 -> γ-CeCeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 7, p. 29, row 23
report
999.8eutectoid: δ-Ce + CeB4 -> γ-CeCeB4: B 0.8model[3] Li 2020Table 7, p. 29, row 25
report
999.15peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce -> γ(Ce)δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1990
Table 2, p. 2, row 11
report
999.15peritectic: L+(δCe)->(γCe)L: B 0.001; (δCe): B 0; (γCe): B 0experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
999.15δ(Ce) + B4Ce -> γ(Ce)δ(Ce): B 0; B4Ce: B 0.8experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Liao 1990
Table 7, p. 9, row 8
report
999eutectoid: δ-Ce + CeB4 -> γ-CeCeB4: B 0.8experimental[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 7, p. 29, row 21
report
999eutectoid: δ-Ce + CeB4 -> γ-CeCeB4: B 0.8unspecified[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 24
Table 7, p. 29, row 22
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, B–Ce system (21)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
B4Ce-65.034 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Premović 2017Table 6, p. 8, row 8
report
B4Ce-62.7 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Premović 2017
cites Persson 2016
Table 6, p. 8, row 6
report
B4CeCeB4-53.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.5298.15experimental-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[1] Premović 2017
cites Samsonov 1956
Table 6, p. 8, row 2
report
B4CeCeB4-51.339 kJ/mol-atommodel-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[1] Premović 2017Table 6, p. 8, row 4
report
B6Ce-53.76 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Premović 2017Table 6, p. 8, row 7
report
B6Ce-51.8 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Premović 2017
cites Persson 2016
Table 6, p. 8, row 5
report
B6CeCeB6-48.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 9.6298.15experimental-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[1] Premović 2017
cites Samsonov 1956
Table 6, p. 8, row 1
report
B6CeCeB6-46.457 kJ/mol-atommodel-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[1] Premović 2017Table 6, p. 8, row 3
report
CeB4-60.385 kJ/mol-atomDFT[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 31
Table 2, p. 25, row 4
report
CeB4CeB4-56.288 kJ/mol-atommodel-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[3] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 6
report
CeB4CeB4-53.62 kJ/mol-atommodel-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 2, p. 25, row 1
report
CeB4CeB4-53.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.5experimental-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 30
Table 2, p. 25, row 3
report
CeB4CeB4-51.339 kJ/mol-atommodel-60.568 (mp-aaaaacxy)-50.107 (oqmd-4683)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 2, p. 25, row 2
report
CeB4-49.904 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 32
Table 2, p. 25, row 5
report
CeB6CeB6-50.541 kJ/mol-atommodel-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 2, p. 25, row 7
report
CeB6-49.712 kJ/mol-atomDFT[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 31
Table 2, p. 25, row 11
report
CeB6CeB6-48.531 kJ/mol-atommodel-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[3] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 13
report
CeB6CeB6-48.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 9.6298.15experimental-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 28
Table 2, p. 25, row 9
report
CeB6-47.019 kJ/mol-atomDFT[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 32
Table 2, p. 25, row 12
report
CeB6CeB6-46.457 kJ/mol-atommodel-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 2, p. 25, row 8
report
CeB6CeB6-30.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 27298.15experimental-49.747 (mp-aaaabfox)-47.134 (oqmd-655892)[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 29
Table 2, p. 25, row 10
report

Other properties

Phase transition (19)

Phase transition, B–Ce system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition998.45 K998.45peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce → γ(Ce) + B4Ce
alloy: B 0.155, Ce 0.845
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
Phase transition998.95 K998.95peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce → γ(Ce) + B4Ce
alloy: B 0.049, Ce 0.951
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase transition999.85 K999.85peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce → γ(Ce) + B4Ce
alloy: B 0.092, Ce 0.908
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase transition1000.75 K1000.75peritectoid: δ(Ce) + B4Ce → γ(Ce) + B4Ce
alloy: B 0.19, Ce 0.81
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase transition1058.45 K1058.45eutectic: L → B4Ce + δ(Ce)
alloy: B 0.155, Ce 0.845
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
Phase transition1059.85 K1059.85eutectic: L → B4Ce + δ(Ce)
alloy: B 0.092, Ce 0.908
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
Phase transition1061.75 K1061.75eutectic: L → B4Ce + δ(Ce)
alloy: B 0.19, Ce 0.81
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
Phase transition1061.95 K1061.95eutectic: L → B4Ce + δ(Ce)
alloy: B 0.049, Ce 0.951
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
Phase transition1071.15 K1071.15congruent melting: L->(δCe)
(δCe): B 0
experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Phase transition1071.95 K1071.95congruent melting: L->(δCe)
(δCe): B 0
model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Phase transition2348.15 K2348.15congruent melting: L->(βB)
(βB): B 1
model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
Phase transition2365.15 K2365.15congruent melting: L->(βB)
(βB): B 1
experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites M 1932
Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
Phase transition2603 K2603congruent melting: L -> CeB6
L: B 0.857; CeB6: B 0.857143
unspecified[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 24
Table 7, p. 29, row 2
report
Phase transition2603 K2603congruent melting: L -> CeB6
L: B 0.857; CeB6: B 0.857143
model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 21
Table 7, p. 29, row 3
report
Phase transition2603 K2603congruent melting: L -> CeB6
L: B 0.857; CeB6: B 0.857143
experimental[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 7, p. 29, row 1
report
Phase transition2603.1 K2603.1congruent melting: L -> CeB6
L: B 0.857; CeB6: B 0.857143
model[3] Li 2020Table 7, p. 29, row 5
report
Phase transition2603.15 K2603.15congruent melting: L->B6Ce
L: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857
experimental[2] Wang 2013
cites Liao 1997 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Phase transition2603.45 K2603.45congruent melting: L->B6Ce
L: B 0.857; B6Ce: B 0.857
model[2] Wang 2013Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
Phase transition2604 K2604congruent melting: L -> CeB6
L: B 0.857; CeB6: B 0.857143
model[3] Li 2020
cites ref. 22
Table 7, p. 29, row 4
report

Phase equilibrium (13)

Phase equilibrium, B–Ce system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.001, Ce 0.999; B4Ce: B 0.806, Ce 0.194
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 5
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.009, Ce 0.991; B4Ce: B 0.802, Ce 0.198
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 7
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.001, Ce 0.999; B4Ce: B 0.805, Ce 0.195
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 8
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.011, Ce 0.989; B4Ce: B 0.793, Ce 0.207
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 4
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.005, Ce 0.995; B4Ce: B 0.802, Ce 0.198
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 3
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.002, Ce 0.998; B4Ce: B 0.792, Ce 0.208
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 2
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.005, Ce 0.995; B4Ce: B 0.811, Ce 0.189
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 9
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + B4Ce + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0.014, Ce 0.986; B4Ce: B 0.81, Ce 0.19
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase composition863.15γ(Ce) + CeO2
γ(Ce): B 0, Ce 1
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 3, p. 3, row 1
report
Phase composition1251.95other: Sample 2 (B4.9Ce95.1)
liquid: B 0.049, Ce 0.951
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase composition1409.85other: Sample 3 (B9.2Ce90.8)
liquid: B 0.092, Ce 0.908
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
Phase composition1558.45other: Sample 4 (B15.5Ce84.5)
liquid: B 0.155, Ce 0.845
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
Phase composition1681.75other: Sample 5 (B19.0Ce81.0)
liquid: B 0.19, Ce 0.81
experimental[1] Premović 2017Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report

Crystal structure (6)

Crystal structure, B–Ce system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a7.2034 not_printed298.15B4Ce
alloy: Ce 0.2
experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Babizhetsky 2007 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice a4.1403 not_printed298.15B6Ce
alloy: Ce 0.142857
unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Komatsubara 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice b7.2034 not_printed298.15B4Ce
alloy: Ce 0.2
experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Babizhetsky 2007 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice b4.1403 not_printed298.15B6Ce
alloy: Ce 0.142857
unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Komatsubara 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c4.1006 not_printed298.15B4Ce
alloy: Ce 0.2
experimental[1] Premović 2017
cites Babizhetsky 2007 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice c4.1403 not_printed298.15B6Ce
alloy: Ce 0.142857
unspecified[1] Premović 2017
cites Komatsubara 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Milena Premović, Yong Du, Fan Zhang, Bo Sundman, Duško Minić, Biao Hu, Phase equilibria in the ternary B-Ce-Cu system with a thermodynamic reassessment of the binary B-Ce system, Thermochimica Acta 657, 185-196 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.10.006
  2. C.P. Wang, Y. Shi, D. Wang, Y. Lu, D.L. Zhao, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessment of the B–Ce and B–Pr systems, Calphad 41, 150-155 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.001
  3. S. Li, M.H. Rong, L. Xu, Q. Wei, J. Wang, G.H. Rao et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the RE-B (RE = Ce, Dy, Lu) binary systems, Calphad 68, 101740 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101740