B–Dy system

37 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 3, model 27, DFT 7); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental3
model27
DFT7
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction24
formation13

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Dy system (24)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2773congruent melting: L ↔ DyB4L: B 0.8; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 1
report
2767.1congruent melting: L ↔ DyB4L: B 0.8; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 3
report
2749.3congruent melting: L ↔ DyB4L: B 0.8; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 2
report
2475.9peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB6DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 5
report
2473peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB6L: B 0.88; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 4
report
2472peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB6DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857experimental[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 33
Table 8, p. 30, row 6
report
2472peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB6L: B 0.955; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 7
report
2423peritectic: L + DyB12 ↔ DyB66DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925experimental[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 34
Table 8, p. 30, row 12
report
2378.8peritectic: L + DyB6 ↔ DyB12DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857; DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 9
report
2373peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB2L: B 0.62; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 15
report
2373peritectic: L + DyB6 ↔ DyB12L: B 0.93; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857; DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 8
report
2371.3peritectic: L + DyB6 ↔ DyB12L: B 0.978; DyB6: B 0.857143, Dy 0.142857; DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 10
report
2369.8peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB2L: B 0.515; DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 17
report
2365peritectic: L + DyB12 ↔ DyB66L: B 0.979; DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 14
report
2364.1peritectic: L + DyB4 ↔ DyB2DyB4: B 0.8, Dy 0.2; DyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 16
report
2347peritectic: L + DyB12 ↔ DyB66DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 13
report
2346.1eutectic: L ↔ DyB66 + β-BL: B 0.998; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 20
report
2343eutectic: L ↔ DyB66 + β-BL: B 0.995; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 19
report
2298peritectic: L + DyB12 ↔ DyB66DyB12: B 0.923077, Dy 0.076923; DyB66: B 0.985075, Dy 0.014925model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 11
report
1673eutectic: L ↔ DyB2 + α-DyDyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 23
Table 8, p. 30, row 23
report
1654peritectic: L+ β -Dy ↔α -Dymodel[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 21
report
1639.7peritectic: L+ β -Dy ↔α -DyL: B 0.028model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 22
report
1619.1eutectic: L ↔ DyB2 + α-DyL: B 0.039; DyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 25
Table 8, p. 30, row 24
report
1608.7eutectic: L ↔ DyB2 + α-DyL: B 0.048; DyB2: B 0.666667, Dy 0.333333model[1] Li 2020Table 8, p. 30, row 25
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, B–Dy system (13)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
DyB12DyB12-24.212 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-24.129 (mp-aaackujk)-24.171 (oqmd-28341)[1] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 25
report
DyB1224.038 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 30
Table 2, p. 25, row 24
report
DyB2DyB2-58.019 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-54.16 (mp-aaaaadbd)-54.212 (oqmd-8332)[1] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 18
report
DyB2-54.44 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 38
Table 2, p. 25, row 15
report
DyB2-54.135 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 30
Table 2, p. 25, row 16
report
DyB2-54.038 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 31
Table 2, p. 25, row 17
report
DyB2DyB2-30.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.3298.15experimental-54.16 (mp-aaaaadbd)-54.212 (oqmd-8332)[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 37
Table 2, p. 25, row 14
report
DyB4-57.692 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 30
Table 2, p. 25, row 19
report
DyB4-57.596 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 31
Table 2, p. 25, row 20
report
DyB4DyB4-55.007 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-57.547 (mp-aaaaaeap)-57.764 (oqmd-12458)[1] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 21
report
DyB6DyB6-38.94 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-38.604 (mp-aaabgisl)-38.617 (oqmd-19358)[1] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 23
report
DyB6-38.558 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Li 2020
cites ref. 31
Table 2, p. 25, row 22
report
DyB66-4.686 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Li 2020Table 2, p. 25, row 26
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Li, M.H. Rong, L. Xu, Q. Wei, J. Wang, G.H. Rao et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the RE-B (RE = Ce, Dy, Lu) binary systems, Calphad 68, 101740 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101740