B–Hf system

57 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 20, model 32, unspecified 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental20
model32
unspecified5
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction32
phase transition3
formation9
heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy8
crystal structure5

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull HfB-10Kau · CALPHAD hull HfB-11Cac · CALPHAD hull HfB-97Bit-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Hf system (32)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
3653congruent melting: L <-> HfB2L: B 0.66; HfB2: B 0.66experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
3650congruent melting: B2Hf -> LiquidB2Hf: B 0.666667, Hf 0.333333; Liquid: B 0.666667, Hf 0.333333model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 138, row 5
report
3650congruent melting: L <-> HfB2L: B 0.667; HfB2: B 0.667model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
3643congruent melting: L <-> HfB2L: B 0.667; HfB2: B 0.667experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 71Por
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
2506congruent melting: L <-> βHfL: B 0; βHf: B 0model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
2491congruent melting: L <-> βHfL: B 0; βHf: B 0experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
2473congruent melting: L <-> βHfL: B 0; βHf: B 0experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 71Por
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
2377.15peritectic: L + HfB2 -> HfBL: B 0.219; HfB2: B 0.667; HfB: B 0.5model[3] Cacciamani 2011Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
2377.15peritectic: L+HfB2=HfBL: B 0.22; HfB2: B 0.666667; HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021
cites Bittermann 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
2377.1peritectic: Liquid + B2Hf -> + BHfB2Hf: B 0.666667, Hf 0.333333; BHf: B 0.5, Hf 0.5model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 138, row 2
report
2377peritectic: L + HfB2 <-> HfBL: B 0.22; HfB2: B 0.667; HfB: B 0.5model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
2373.15peritectic: L+HfB2=HfBL: B 0.2213; HfB2: B 0.666667; HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
2373peritectic: L + HfB2 <-> HfBL: B 0.24; HfB2: B 0.66; HfB: B 0.5experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
2343eutectic: L <-> HfB2 + BL: B 0.98; HfB2: B 0.667; B: B 1experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 71Por
Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
2338.15eutectic: L=HfB2+(βB)L: B 0.99; HfB2: B 0.666667; (βB): B 1model[4] Pan 2021
cites Bittermann 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
2338.15eutectic: L -> HfB2 + BL: B 0.99; HfB2: B 0.677; B: B 1model[3] Cacciamani 2011Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report
2338eutectic: L <-> HfB2 + BL: B 0.99; HfB2: B 0.66; B: B 1experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
2338eutectic: L <-> HfB2 + BL: B 0.99; HfB2: B 0.667; B: B 1model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
2337.9eutectic: Liquid -> β-rhombo-B + B2HfB2Hf: B 0.666667, Hf 0.333333model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 138, row 1
report
2337.15eutectic: L=HfB2+(βB)L: B 0.9895; HfB2: B 0.666667; (βB): B 1model[4] Pan 2021Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
2154.15eutectic: L -> HfB + bcc-HfL: B 0.15; HfB: B 0.5; bcc-Hf: B 0.01model[3] Cacciamani 2011Table 1, p. 4, row 4
report
2154.15eutectic: L=(βHf)+HfBL: B 0.15; HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021
cites Bittermann 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report
2154eutectic: L <-> βHf + HfBL: B 0.15; βHf: B 0.01; HfB: B 0.5model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 16
report
2153.6eutectic: Liquid -> BHf + bcc-A2BHf: B 0.5, Hf 0.5model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 138, row 3
report
2153eutectic: L <-> βHf + HfBL: B 0.13; HfB: B 0.5experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 15
report
2148.15eutectic: L=(βHf)+HfBL: B 0.1515; HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
2073peritectoid: βHf + HfB <-> αHfHfB: B 0.5experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report
2066.15peritectoid: (βHf)+HfB=(αHf)HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
2064.15peritectoid: (βHf)+HfB=(αHf)HfB: B 0.5model[4] Pan 2021
cites Bittermann 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report
2064peritectoid: βHf + HfB <-> αHfβHf: B 0.007; HfB: B 0.5; αHf: B 0.015model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
2063.8peritectic: bcc-A2 + BHf -> hcp-A3BHf: B 0.5, Hf 0.5model[2] (ed.) 1998Table I, p. 138, row 4
report
2063.15peritectoid: HfB + bcc-Hf -> hcp-HfHfB: B 0.5; bcc-Hf: B 0.007; hcp-Hf: B 0.015model[3] Cacciamani 2011Table 1, p. 4, row 5
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, B–Hf system (9)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
HfBHfB-98.95 kJ/mol-atom ± 6.3298.15experimental-39.896 (mp-aaaaaanh)-40.239 (oqmd-13677)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 64
Table 3, p. 4, row 21
report
HfBHfB-79.905 kJ/mol-atommodel-39.896 (mp-aaaaaanh)-40.239 (oqmd-13677)[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report
HfB2HfB2-117.633 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Krupka 1962
Table 3, p. 4, row 13
report
HfB2HfB2-109.633 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.93333298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 67Joh
Table 3, p. 4, row 15
report
HfB2HfB2-106.567 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 64
Table 3, p. 4, row 14
report
HfB2HfB2-106.567 kJ/mol-atommodel-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
HfB2HfB2-105.033 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Paderno 1959
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
HfB2HfB2-87.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.66667298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Maslov 1978
Table 3, p. 4, row 17
report
HfB2HfB2-83.1333 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.96667298.15experimental-98.211 (mp-aaaaacys)-98.749 (oqmd-5848)[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Kitpichev 1979
Table 3, p. 4, row 18
report

Other properties

Phase transition (3)

Phase transition, B–Hf system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition3650.15 K3650.15congruent melting: L=HfB2
L: B 0.667; HfB2: B 0.666667
model[4] Pan 2021
cites Bittermann 1997 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase transition3651.15 K3651.15congruent melting: L -> HfB2
L: B 0.667; HfB2: B 0.667
model[3] Cacciamani 2011Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Phase transition3651.15 K3651.15congruent melting: L=HfB2
L: B 0.6666; HfB2: B 0.666667
model[4] Pan 2021Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (8)

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy, B–Hf system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy
printed: S0
22.235 J/mol-atom/KHfB
alloy: Hf 0.5
model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report
Entropy
printed: S0
14.3667 J/mol-atom/K ± 0.133333HfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 89Bol
Table 3, p. 4, row 19
report
Entropy
printed: S0
14.2967 J/mol-atom/KHfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
Entropy
printed: S0
14.2967 J/mol-atom/KHfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Westrum 1977 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp0
18.385 J/mol-atom/KHfB
alloy: Hf 0.5
model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 22
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp0
16.49 J/mol-atom/KHfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 89Bol
Table 3, p. 4, row 19
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp0
16.6033 J/mol-atom/KHfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
model[1] Bittermann 1997Table 3, p. 4, row 20
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp0
16.5967 J/mol-atom/KHfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
experimental[1] Bittermann 1997
cites Westrum 1977 doi
Table 3, p. 4, row 16
report

Crystal structure (5)

Crystal structure, B–Hf system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a0.65185 not_printed298.15HfB
alloy: Hf 0.5
unspecified[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice a0.31438 not_printed ± 2.000e-5298.15HfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
unspecified[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 85Vil
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Lattice b0.3216 not_printed298.15HfB
alloy: Hf 0.5
unspecified[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice c0.492 not_printed298.15HfB
alloy: Hf 0.5
unspecified[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 65Rud1
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice c0.34793 not_printed ± 2.000e-5298.15HfB2
alloy: Hf 0.333333
unspecified[1] Bittermann 1997
cites ref. 85Vil
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. H. Bittermann, P. Rogl, Critical assessment and thermodynamic calculation of the ternary system boron-hafnium-titanium (B-Hf-Ti), JPE 18, 24-47 (1997). doi:10.1007/bf02646757
  2. I. Ansara, A. T. Dinsdale, M. H. Rand (eds.), COST 507: Thermochemical database for light metal alloys, Volume 2, EUR 18499 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1998), ISBN 92-828-3902-8.
  3. G. Cacciamani, P. Riani, F. Valenza, Equilibrium between MB2 (M=Ti,Zr,Hf) UHTC and Ni: A thermodynamic database for the B–Hf–Ni–Ti–Zr system, Calphad 35, 601-619 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.10.003
  4. Yafei Pan, Lei Huang, Jiuxing Zhang, Yong Du, Fenghua Luo, Shuyan Zhang, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Ternary B-Hf-Zr System with Refined B-Hf Description, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 42, 864-878 (2021). doi:10.1007/s11669-021-00928-3