B–Mn system

61 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 54); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 6 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental7
model54
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction39
crystal structure22

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Mn system (39)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2263.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnB2MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 25
report
2163.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnBMnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 15
report
2163.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnBMnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report
2163.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnBMnB: B 0.5experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Markovskii 1967
Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
2161.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnBMnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
2107.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnB2MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 23
report
2100.15L + MnB ↔ Mn3B4L: B 0.573; MnB: B 0.5; Mn3B4: B 0.571model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 18
report
2100.15congruent melting: L ↔ MnB2MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 24
report
2079.15L + MnB ↔ Mn3B4L: B 0.573; MnB: B 0.5; Mn3B4: B 0.571model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 17
report
2073.15L ↔ MnB2 + βBL: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 28
report
2061.15L ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB2L: B 0.611; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 20
report
2023.15L ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB2L: B 0.615; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 21
report
2023.15L + MnB ↔ Mn3B4MnB: B 0.5; Mn3B4: B 0.571model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 19
report
2003.15L ↔ MnB2 + βBL: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667; βB: B 1model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 27
report
1977.15L ↔ MnB2 + βBL: B 0.77; MnB2: B 0.667; βB: B 0.959model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 26
report
1903.15L ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB2Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 22
report
1853.15congruent melting: L ↔ t-Mn2Bt-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
1853.15congruent melting: L ↔ t-Mn2Bt-Mn2B: B 0.333experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Markovskii 1967
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
1853.15congruent melting: L ↔ t-Mn2Bt-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
1819.15congruent melting: L ↔ t-Mn2Bt-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
1818.15L ↔ t-Mn2B + MnBL: B 0.343; t-Mn2B: B 0.333; MnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
1783.15L ↔ t-Mn2B + MnBL: B 0.39; t-Mn2B: B 0.333; MnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
1783.15L ↔ t-Mn2B + MnBL: B 0.37; t-Mn2B: B 0.333; MnB: B 0.5model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
1783.15L ↔ t-Mn2B + MnBt-Mn2B: B 0.333; MnB: B 0.5experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Markovskii 1967
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
1648.15MnB4 ↔ MnB2 + βBMnB4: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667; βB: B 1model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 38
report
1648.15MnB4 ↔ MnB2 + βBMnB4: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 39
report
1648.15MnB4 ↔ MnB2 + βBMnB4: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667; βB: B 0.965model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 36
report
1623.15MnB4 ↔ MnB2 + βBMnB4: B 0.8; MnB2: B 0.667experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Andersson 1970 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 37
report
1484.15L ↔ δMn + t-Mn2BL: B 0.143; t-Mn2B: B 0.333experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Pradelli 1974
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
1484.15L ↔ δMn + t-Mn2BL: B 0.143; t-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
1480.15L ↔ δMn + t-Mn2BL: B 0.15; δMn: B 0; t-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
1477.15L ↔ δMn + t-Mn2BL: B 0.089; δMn: B 0; t-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
1397.15o-Mn2B0.982 ↔ γMn + t-Mn2Bo-Mn2B0.982: B 0.329; γMn: B 0; t-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 29
report
1397.15o-Mn2B0.982 ↔ γMn + t-Mn2Bt-Mn2B: B 0.333experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Pradelli 1974
Table 4, p. 5, row 30
report
1393.15o-Mn2B0.982 ↔ γMn + t-Mn2Bo-Mn2B0.982: B 0.25; γMn: B 0; t-Mn2B: B 0.333model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 31
report
1373.15MnB2 ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB4MnB2: B 0.667; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB4: B 0.8model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 34
report
1358.15MnB2 ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB4MnB2: B 0.667; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB4: B 0.8model[1] Sun 2010Table 4, p. 5, row 32
report
1348.15MnB2 ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB4MnB2: B 0.667; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB4: B 0.8model[1] Sun 2010
cites Okamoto 1993 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 35
report
1323.15MnB2 ↔ Mn3B4 + MnB4MnB2: B 0.667; Mn3B4: B 0.571; MnB4: B 0.8experimental[1] Sun 2010
cites Andersson 1970 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 33
report

Other properties

Crystal structure (22)

Crystal structure, B–Mn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a3.03 Å298.15Mn3B4
alloy: Mn 0.428571
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice a14.53 Å298.15Mn4B
alloy: Mn 0.8
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice a5.56 Å298.15MnB
alloy: Mn 0.5
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice a3.007 Å298.15MnB2
alloy: Mn 0.333333
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice a10.9907 Å298.15MnB23
alloy: Mn 0.041667
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Lattice a5.503 Å298.15MnB4
alloy: Mn 0.2
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice a14.54 Å298.15o-Mn2B0.982
alloy: Mn 0.670691
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice a5.148 Å298.15t-Mn2B
alloy: Mn 0.666667
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice b12.86 Å298.15Mn3B4
alloy: Mn 0.428571
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice b7.293 Å298.15Mn4B
alloy: Mn 0.8
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice b2.977 Å298.15MnB
alloy: Mn 0.5
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice b5.369 Å298.15MnB4
alloy: Mn 0.2
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice b7.291 Å298.15o-Mn2B0.982
alloy: Mn 0.670691
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c2.96 Å298.15Mn3B4
alloy: Mn 0.428571
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice c4.209 Å298.15Mn4B
alloy: Mn 0.8
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice c4.145 Å298.15MnB
alloy: Mn 0.5
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice c3.037 Å298.15MnB2
alloy: Mn 0.333333
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice c23.9964 Å298.15MnB23
alloy: Mn 0.041667
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Lattice c2.949 Å298.15MnB4
alloy: Mn 0.2
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice c4.208 Å298.15o-Mn2B0.982
alloy: Mn 0.670691
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c4.208 Å298.15t-Mn2B
alloy: Mn 0.666667
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
lattice unspecified axis122.71 °C298.15MnB4
alloy: Mn 0.2
model[1] Sun 2010
cites Liao 1986 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Weihua Sun, Yong Du, Shuhong Liu, Baiyun Huang, Chao Jiang, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Mn-B System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 31, 357-364 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-010-9740-6