B–Mo–Ti system

13 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 6); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	7
model	6

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	13

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Mo–Ti system (13)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2906	peritectic: L + MB2 -> (βMoB)	L: B 0.467, Mo 0.377; MB2: B 0.661, Mo 0.039; (βMoB): B 0.5, Mo 0.32	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 3 report
2823	peritectic: L + MB2 -> (TiB)	L: B 0.275, Mo 0.285; MB2: B 0.65, Mo 0.048; (TiB): B 0.505, Mo 0.14	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 1 report
2763	peritectic: L + (βMoB) + MB2 -> (TiB)	L: B 0.265, Mo 0.371; (βMoB): B 0.505, Mo 0.195; MB2: B 0.65, Mo 0.09; (TiB): B 0.505, Mo 0.18	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 4 report
2724	peritectic: L + (βMoB) + MB2 -> (TiB)	L: B 0.356, Mo 0.279; (βMoB): B 0.497, Mo 0.21; MB2: B 0.654, Mo 0.014; (TiB): B 0.497, Mo 0.205	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 5 report
2623	eutectic: L -> MB2 + (βMoB)	L: B 0.537, Mo 0.357; MB2: B 0.64, Mo 0.28; (βMoB): B 0.505, Mo 0.38	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 2 report
2403	quasi-peritectic: L + MB2 -> (TiB) + (Ti3B4)	L: B 0.305, Mo 0.025; MB2: B 0.65, Mo 0.005; (TiB): B 0.505, Mo 0.027; (Ti3B4): B 0.545, Mo 0.008	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 6 report
2401	quasi-peritectic: L + MB2 -> (TiB) + (Ti3B4)	L: B 0.31, Mo 0.036; MB2: B 0.653, Mo 0.003; (TiB): B 0.497, Mo 0.026; (Ti3B4): B 0.571, Mo 0.007	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 7 report
2296	quasi-peritectic: L + (Mo2B) -> A2 + (βMoB)	L: B 0.209, Mo 0.608; (Mo2B): B 0.329, Mo 0.554; A2: B 0.003, Mo 0.906; (βMoB): B 0.496, Mo 0.307	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 9 report
2293	quasi-peritectic: L + (Mo2B) -> A2 + (βMoB)	L: B 0.212, Mo 0.637; (Mo2B): B 0.333, Mo 0.58; A2: B 0.018, Mo 0.888; (βMoB): B 0.495, Mo 0.32	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 8 report
2253	quasi-peritectic: L + MB2 -> (βB) + (Mo2B5)	L: B 0.945, Mo 0.045; MB2: B 0.67, Mo 0.115; (βB): B 0.992, Mo 0.008; (Mo2B5): B 0.688, Mo 0.234	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 10 report
2214	quasi-peritectic: L + MB2 -> (βB) + (Mo2B5)	L: B 0.891, Mo 0.108; MB2: B 0.667, Mo 0.251; (βB): B 0.998, Mo 0.002; (Mo2B5): B 0.689, Mo 0.284	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 11 report
2173	quasi-peritectic: L + (βMoB) -> A2 + (TiB)	L: B 0.15, Mo 0.423; (βMoB): B 0.495, Mo 0.185; A2: B 0.013, Mo 0.627; (TiB): B 0.495, Mo 0.17	experimental	[1] Witusiewicz 2016 cites Potazhevska 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 11, row 12 report
2170	quasi-peritectic: L + (βMoB) -> A2 + (TiB)	L: B 0.184, Mo 0.491; (βMoB): B 0.494, Mo 0.253; A2: B 0.003, Mo 0.777; (TiB): B 0.484, Mo 0.225	model	[1] Witusiewicz 2016	Table 4, p. 11, row 13 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, O.A. Potazhevska, T.Ya Velikanova, Thermodynamic modelling of the ternary B–Mo–Ti system with refined B–Mo description, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 655, 336-352 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.158

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}