B–Zr system
45 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 13, model 28, DFT 4); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 13 |
| model | 28 |
| DFT | 4 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 30 |
| phase transition | 3 |
| formation | 12 |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull ZrB-08Tok · CALPHAD hull ZrB-09Che · CALPHAD hull ZrB-11Cac · CALPHAD hull ZrB-98Dus-LB
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3518 | congruent melting: L -> ZrB2 | L: Zr 0.66; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Rudy 1966 | Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| 3506 | congruent melting: L -> ZrB2 | L: Zr 0.666; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| 3500 | congruent melting: L -> ZrB2 | L: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Portnoi 1970 | Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| 2523 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12 | L: Zr 0.91; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Rudy 1966 | Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report | |
| 2362.15 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12 | L: B 0.938; ZrB2: B 0.675; ZrB12: B 0.923 | model | [2] Cacciamani 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report | |
| 2310.15 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 = ZrB12 | L: B 0.939; ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB12: B 0.923077 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| 2310 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12 | L: Zr 0.939; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| 2309.15 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 = ZrB12 | L: B 0.94; ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB12: B 0.923077 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| 2303 | peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12 | L: Zr 0.92; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Portnoi 1970 | Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| 2299.15 | eutectic: L -> B + ZrB12 | L: B 0.967; B: B 1; ZrB12: B 0.923 | model | [2] Cacciamani 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 3 report | |
| 2282.15 | eutectic: L = ZrB12 + (βB) | L: B 0.9573; ZrB12: B 0.923077 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| 2282.15 | eutectic: L = ZrB12 + (βB) | L: B 0.957; ZrB12: B 0.923077 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| 2282 | eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-B | L: Zr 0.957; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report | |
| 2273 | eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-B | L: Zr 0.98; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Rudy 1966 | Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report | |
| 2248 | eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-B | L: Zr 0.96; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Portnoi 1970 | Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| 1988.15 | eutectoid: ZrB12 = ZrB2 + β-B | ZrB12: B 0.923077; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| 1984.15 | eutectoid: ZrB12 = ZrB2 + β-B | ZrB12: B 0.923077; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| 1984 | eutectoid: ZrB12 -> ZrB2+β-B | ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report | |
| 1983 | eutectoid: ZrB12 -> ZrB2+β-B | ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Rudy 1966 | Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report | |
| 1963.15 | eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-Zr | L: B 0.135; ZrB2: B 0.667; bcc-Zr: B 0.01 | model | [2] Cacciamani 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 4 report | |
| 1953 | eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-Zr | L: Zr 0.14; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Portnoi 1970 | Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report | |
| 1934.15 | eutectic: L = ZrB2 + (βZr) | L: B 0.124; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| 1934.15 | eutectic: L = ZrB2 + (βZr) | L: B 0.1242; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| 1934 | eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-Zr | L: Zr 0.1242; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report | |
| 1933 | eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-Zr | L: Zr 0.12; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Rudy 1966 | Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report | |
| 1523.15 | peritectoid: ZrB2 + (βZr) = ZrB | ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB: B 0.5 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| 1523.15 | peritectoid: ZrB2 + (βZr) = ZrB | ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB: B 0.5 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| 1523 | peritectoid: ZrB2+bcc-Zr -> ZrB | ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB: B 0.5, Zr 0.5 | experimental | [1] Chen 2009 cites Glaser 1953 | Table 4, p. 5, row 16 report | |
| 1523 | peritectoid: ZrB2+bcc-Zr -> ZrB | ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB: B 0.5, Zr 0.5 | model | [1] Chen 2009 | Table 4, p. 5, row 17 report | |
| 1461.15 | peritectoid: ZrB2 + bcc-Zr -> ZrB | ZrB2: B 0.667; bcc-Zr: B 0.001; ZrB: B 0.5 | model | [2] Cacciamani 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 5 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZrB(FeB-type) | -79.3 unknown | model | [4] Tokunaga 2008 cites Rogl 1988 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report | |||||
| ZrB(FeB-type) | -72.6 unknown | model | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report | |||||
| ZrB(FeB-type) | -67.1 unknown | 0 | DFT | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report | ||||
| ZrB(NaCl-type) | -39.6 unknown | 0 | DFT | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report | ||||
| ZrB12 | -24.1 unknown | 0 | DFT | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report | ||||
| ZrB12 | -22.5 unknown | model | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 11 report | |||||
| ZrB2 | -108.9 unknown ± 2.1 | 298.15 | experimental | [4] Tokunaga 2008 cites Johnson 1967 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 8 report | ||||
| ZrB2 | -107.7 unknown ± 1.7 | 298.15 | experimental | [4] Tokunaga 2008 cites Huber 1964 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 7 report | ||||
| ZrB2 | -107.368 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 298.15 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | p. 8 report | The calculated enthalpy of formation of solid phases at 298 K is shown in Fig. 4 and the enthalpy of formation for ZrB2 was optimized to be - 107,368 J/mol, in accordance with the experimental values.[19,20] | |||
| ZrB2 | -100.6 unknown | model | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report | |||||
| ZrB2 | -100.3 unknown | 0 | DFT | [4] Tokunaga 2008 | Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report | ||||
| ZrB2 | -93 unknown | 298.15 | experimental | [4] Tokunaga 2008 cites Kirpichev 1979 | Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (3)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 3503.15 K | 3503.15 | congruent melting: L = ZrB2 L: B 0.6667; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 | Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Phase transition | 3506.15 K | 3506.15 | congruent melting: L = ZrB2 L: B 0.666; ZrB2: B 0.666667 | model | [3] Pan 2019 cites Chen 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Phase transition | 3516.15 K | 3516.15 | congruent melting: L -> ZrB2 L: B 0.667; ZrB2: B 0.667 | model | [2] Cacciamani 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- H.M. Chen, F. Zheng, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of B–Zr and Si–Zr binary systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 468, 209-216 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.061
- G. Cacciamani, P. Riani, F. Valenza, Equilibrium between MB2 (M=Ti,Zr,Hf) UHTC and Ni: A thermodynamic database for the B–Hf–Ni–Ti–Zr system, Calphad 35, 601-619 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.10.003
- Yafei Pan, Cong Zhang, Jiuxing Zhang, Lei Huang, Xinyu Yang, Yong Du et al., Thermodynamic Modeling of the B-Ti-Zr System Over the Whole Composition and Temperature Ranges, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 40, 364-374 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00728-w
- Tatsuya Tokunaga, Ken Terashima, Hiroshi Ohtani, Mitsuhiro Hasebe, Thermodynamic Analysis of the Phase Equilibria in the Fe-Zr-B System, Mater. Trans. 49, 2534-2540 (2008). doi:10.2320/matertrans.mb200809