B–Zr system

45 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 13, model 28, DFT 4); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental13
model28
DFT4
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction30
phase transition3
formation12

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull ZrB-08Tok · CALPHAD hull ZrB-09Che · CALPHAD hull ZrB-11Cac · CALPHAD hull ZrB-98Dus-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the B–Zr system (30)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
3518congruent melting: L -> ZrB2L: Zr 0.66; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Rudy 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
3506congruent melting: L -> ZrB2L: Zr 0.666; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
3500congruent melting: L -> ZrB2L: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Portnoi 1970
Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
2523peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12L: Zr 0.91; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Rudy 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
2362.15peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12L: B 0.938; ZrB2: B 0.675; ZrB12: B 0.923model[2] Cacciamani 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 2
report
2310.15peritectic: L + ZrB2 = ZrB12L: B 0.939; ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB12: B 0.923077model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
2310peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12L: Zr 0.939; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
2309.15peritectic: L + ZrB2 = ZrB12L: B 0.94; ZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB12: B 0.923077model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
2303peritectic: L + ZrB2 -> ZrB12L: Zr 0.92; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Portnoi 1970
Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
2299.15eutectic: L -> B + ZrB12L: B 0.967; B: B 1; ZrB12: B 0.923model[2] Cacciamani 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 3
report
2282.15eutectic: L = ZrB12 + (βB)L: B 0.9573; ZrB12: B 0.923077model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
2282.15eutectic: L = ZrB12 + (βB)L: B 0.957; ZrB12: B 0.923077model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
2282eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-BL: Zr 0.957; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
2273eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-BL: Zr 0.98; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Rudy 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
2248eutectic: L -> ZrB12+β-BL: Zr 0.96; ZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Portnoi 1970
Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
1988.15eutectoid: ZrB12 = ZrB2 + β-BZrB12: B 0.923077; ZrB2: B 0.666667model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
1984.15eutectoid: ZrB12 = ZrB2 + β-BZrB12: B 0.923077; ZrB2: B 0.666667model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
1984eutectoid: ZrB12 -> ZrB2+β-BZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
1983eutectoid: ZrB12 -> ZrB2+β-BZrB12: B 0.923077, Zr 0.076923; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Rudy 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
1963.15eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-ZrL: B 0.135; ZrB2: B 0.667; bcc-Zr: B 0.01model[2] Cacciamani 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 4
report
1953eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-ZrL: Zr 0.14; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Portnoi 1970
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
1934.15eutectic: L = ZrB2 + (βZr)L: B 0.124; ZrB2: B 0.666667model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
1934.15eutectic: L = ZrB2 + (βZr)L: B 0.1242; ZrB2: B 0.666667model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
1934eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-ZrL: Zr 0.1242; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
1933eutectic: L -> ZrB2 + bcc-ZrL: Zr 0.12; ZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Rudy 1966
Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
1523.15peritectoid: ZrB2 + (βZr) = ZrBZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB: B 0.5model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
1523.15peritectoid: ZrB2 + (βZr) = ZrBZrB2: B 0.666667; ZrB: B 0.5model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
1523peritectoid: ZrB2+bcc-Zr -> ZrBZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB: B 0.5, Zr 0.5experimental[1] Chen 2009
cites Glaser 1953
Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report
1523peritectoid: ZrB2+bcc-Zr -> ZrBZrB2: B 0.666667, Zr 0.333333; ZrB: B 0.5, Zr 0.5model[1] Chen 2009Table 4, p. 5, row 17
report
1461.15peritectoid: ZrB2 + bcc-Zr -> ZrBZrB2: B 0.667; bcc-Zr: B 0.001; ZrB: B 0.5model[2] Cacciamani 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, B–Zr system (12)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
ZrB(FeB-type)-79.3 unknownmodel[4] Tokunaga 2008
cites Rogl 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
ZrB(FeB-type)-72.6 unknownmodel[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
ZrB(FeB-type)-67.1 unknown0DFT[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
ZrB(NaCl-type)-39.6 unknown0DFT[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
ZrB12-24.1 unknown0DFT[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
ZrB12-22.5 unknownmodel[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 11
report
ZrB2-108.9 unknown ± 2.1298.15experimental[4] Tokunaga 2008
cites Johnson 1967 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
ZrB2-107.7 unknown ± 1.7298.15experimental[4] Tokunaga 2008
cites Huber 1964 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report
ZrB2-107.368 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[3] Pan 2019p. 8
report
The calculated enthalpy of formation of solid phases at 298 K is shown in Fig. 4 and the enthalpy of formation for ZrB2 was optimized to be - 107,368 J/mol, in accordance with the experimental values.[19,20]
ZrB2-100.6 unknownmodel[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
ZrB2-100.3 unknown0DFT[4] Tokunaga 2008Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
ZrB2-93 unknown298.15experimental[4] Tokunaga 2008
cites Kirpichev 1979
Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report

Other properties

Phase transition (3)

Phase transition, B–Zr system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition3503.15 K3503.15congruent melting: L = ZrB2
L: B 0.6667; ZrB2: B 0.666667
model[3] Pan 2019Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Phase transition3506.15 K3506.15congruent melting: L = ZrB2
L: B 0.666; ZrB2: B 0.666667
model[3] Pan 2019
cites Chen 2009 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Phase transition3516.15 K3516.15congruent melting: L -> ZrB2
L: B 0.667; ZrB2: B 0.667
model[2] Cacciamani 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 1
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. H.M. Chen, F. Zheng, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of B–Zr and Si–Zr binary systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 468, 209-216 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.061
  2. G. Cacciamani, P. Riani, F. Valenza, Equilibrium between MB2 (M=Ti,Zr,Hf) UHTC and Ni: A thermodynamic database for the B–Hf–Ni–Ti–Zr system, Calphad 35, 601-619 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.10.003
  3. Yafei Pan, Cong Zhang, Jiuxing Zhang, Lei Huang, Xinyu Yang, Yong Du et al., Thermodynamic Modeling of the B-Ti-Zr System Over the Whole Composition and Temperature Ranges, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 40, 364-374 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00728-w
  4. Tatsuya Tokunaga, Ken Terashima, Hiroshi Ohtani, Mitsuhiro Hasebe, Thermodynamic Analysis of the Phase Equilibria in the Fe-Zr-B System, Mater. Trans. 49, 2534-2540 (2008). doi:10.2320/matertrans.mb200809