Bi–Cs system

73 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 23, model 37, DFT 7, unspecified 6); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental23
model37
DFT7
unspecified6
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction24
phase transition1
formation15
crystal structure33

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
BiCs-15Dja.tdbY. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, S. Ugur, G. Ugur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Calphad, 48, 72-78(2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002f0497ab1e5628a6068329844ee642503b92cdb730ce9bcf24818f1f5875cb8b3viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
BiCs-15Dja.tdb754.95BI2CS3 (x(Cs) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Cs) 0.61627) + BICS3_D03 (x(Cs) 0.75)
BiCs-15Dja.tdb679.55LIQUID (x(Cs) 0.52324) + BI4CS5 (x(Cs) 0.55556) + BI2CS3 (x(Cs) 0.6)
BiCs-15Dja.tdb667.56BI2CS_C15 (x(Cs) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Cs) 0.50824) + BI4CS5 (x(Cs) 0.55556)
BiCs-15Dja.tdb541.95RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Cs) 0) + LIQUID (x(Cs) 0.01417) + BI2CS_C15 (x(Cs) 0.33333)
BiCs-15Dja.tdb301.5BICS3_D03 (x(Cs) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Cs) 0.99976) + BCC_A2 (x(Cs) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Cs system (24)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
937.4congruent melting: L -> BiCs3L: Cs 0.75; BiCs3: Cs 0.75model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 22
report
933congruent melting: L -> BiCs3L: Cs 0.75; BiCs3: Cs 0.75experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Zhuravlev 1958
Table 4, p. 5, row 19
report
923congruent melting: L -> BiCs3L: Cs 0.75; BiCs3: Cs 0.75experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 21
report
908congruent melting: L -> BiCs3L: Cs 0.75; BiCs3: Cs 0.75experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 20
report
903congruent melting: L -> Bi2CsL: Cs 0.333; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Zhuravlev 1958
Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report
868congruent melting: L -> Bi2CsL: Cs 0.333; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
868congruent melting: L -> Bi2CsL: Cs 0.333; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 7
report
854.9congruent melting: L -> Bi2CsL: Cs 0.333; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 8
report
774peritectic: L + BiCs3 -> Bi2Cs3BiCs3: Cs 0.75; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 15
report
773peritectic: L + BiCs3 -> Bi2Cs3L: Cs 0.599; BiCs3: Cs 0.75; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 16
report
763peritectic: L + BiCs3 -> Bi2Cs3BiCs3: Cs 0.75; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Zhuravlev 1958
Table 4, p. 5, row 14
report
758.1congruent melting: L -> Bi2Cs3L: Cs 0.6; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 18
report
754.95eutectic: L + BiCs3 -> Bi2Cs3L: Cs 0.616; BiCs3: Cs 0.75; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 17
report
691peritectic: L + Bi2Cs3 -> Bi4Cs5L: Cs 0.54; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6; Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 12
report
678.7peritectic: L + Bi2Cs3 -> Bi4Cs5L: Cs 0.523; Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6; Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 13
report
667.13eutectic: L -> Bi2Cs + Bi4Cs5L: Cs 0.508; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333; Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 11
report
663eutectic: L -> Bi2Cs + Bi4Cs5L: Cs 0.505; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333; Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 10
report
663eutectic: L -> Bi2Cs + Bi4Cs5L: Cs 0.57; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333; Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Zhuravlev 1958
Table 4, p. 5, row 9
report
543eutectic: L -> (Bi) + Bi2CsL: Cs 0.025; (Bi): Cs 0; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
542.6eutectic: L -> (Bi) + Bi2CsL: Cs 0.013; (Bi): Cs 0; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 4
report
540eutectic: L -> (Bi) + Bi2CsL: Cs 0.02; (Bi): Cs 0; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 3
report
523eutectic: L -> (Bi) + Bi2CsL: Cs 0.03; (Bi): Cs 0; Bi2Cs: Cs 0.333experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Zhuravlev 1958
Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
301.5eutectic: L -> BiCs3 + (Cs)L: Cs 0.999; BiCs3: Cs 0.75; (Cs): Cs 1model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 4, p. 5, row 24
report
301.39eutectic: L -> BiCs3 + (Cs)L: Cs 1; BiCs3: Cs 0.75; (Cs): Cs 1experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 23
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Bi–Cs system (15)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Bi2Cs-37.753 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
Bi2CsBi2Cs-31.027 kJ/mol-atommodel-29.714 (mp-aaaabigx)-29.789 (oqmd-647553)[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
Bi2Cs-30.442 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
Bi2CsBi2Cs-26.2 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-29.714 (mp-aaaabigx)-29.789 (oqmd-647553)[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Voronin 1975
Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
Bi2Cs3-41.326 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
Bi2Cs3Bi2Cs3-40.7 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-31.375 (mp-aaabgrwc)-34.17 (oqmd-22902)[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Voronin 1975
Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
Bi2Cs3-34.483 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
Bi2Cs3Bi2Cs3-33.968 kJ/mol-atommodel-31.375 (mp-aaabgrwc)-34.17 (oqmd-22902)[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
Bi4Cs5Bi4Cs5-38.3 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-37.814 (oqmd-1372721)[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Voronin 1975
Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
Bi4Cs5-36.683 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
Bi4Cs5Bi4Cs5-34.933 kJ/mol-atommodel-37.814 (oqmd-1372721)[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
BiCs3-44.202 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 14
report
BiCs3BiCs3-43.5 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-27.378 (mp-aaabkdyz)-33.261 (oqmd-1521866)[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Voronin 1975
Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report
BiCs3BiCs3-32.568 kJ/mol-atommodel-27.378 (mp-aaabkdyz)-33.261 (oqmd-1521866)[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 15
report
BiCs3-31.394 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 13
report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, Bi–Cs system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition773 K773congruent transformationmodel[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Sangster 1991 doi
p. 4
report
This result confirms the suggestion of Sangster and Pelton [18] that the congruent melting near 773 K of this compound is equally probable with the peritectic decomposition.

Crystal structure (33)

Crystal structure, Bi–Cs system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a9.488 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice a9.774 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice a10.221 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice a9.631 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice a13.03 ÅBi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice a9.465 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
Lattice a8.934 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice a9.72 Å298.15Bi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Emmerling 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice a10.077 Å298.15Bi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2000 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice a12.887 Å298.15Bi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice a9.31 Å298.15BiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Lattice b9.488 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice b9.774 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice b10.478 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice b10.147 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice b6.423 ÅBi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice b9.465 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
Lattice b8.934 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice b9.72 Å298.15Bi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Emmerling 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice b10.32 Å298.15Bi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2000 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice b6.323 Å298.15Bi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice b9.31 Å298.15BiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Lattice c9.488 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Lattice c9.774 ÅBi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Lattice c10.168 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Lattice c9.762 ÅBi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Lattice c12.695 ÅBi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Lattice c9.465 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
Lattice c8.934 ÅBiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
model[1] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Lattice c9.72 Å298.15Bi2Cs
Bi2Cs: Cs 0.33
model[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Emmerling 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Lattice c10.145 Å298.15Bi2Cs3
Bi2Cs3: Cs 0.6
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2000 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Lattice c12.636 Å298.15Bi4Cs5
Bi4Cs5: Cs 0.556
unspecified[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gascoin 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Lattice c9.31 Å298.15BiCs3
BiCs3: Cs 0.75
experimental[1] Djaballah 2015
cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Y. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, Ş. Uğur, G. Uğur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic description of the Bi–Cs and Bi–Tm system supported by first-principles calculations, Calphad 48, 72-78 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002