Bi–Fe–Sb system

12 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9, model 3); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 38 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	9
model	3

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	6
phase equilibrium	6

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Fe–Sb system (6)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1264.25	other: L1 = L2 + δFe + ε-FeSb (M)		experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 2 report
1260.8	other: L1 = L2 + δFe + ε-FeSb (M)	L1: Sb 0.3759; L2: Sb 0.3578; δFe: Sb 0.0526; ε-FeSb: Sb 0.4025	model	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 1 report
550.7	quasi-peritectic: L + FeSb2 = β + ε-FeSb (U1)	L: Sb 0.01676; FeSb2: Sb 0.6667; β: Sb 0.04447; ε-FeSb: Sb 0.4893	model	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 3 report
549.4	quasi-peritectic: L + FeSb2 = β + ε-FeSb (U1)	FeSb2: Sb 0.6667	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 4 report
546.5	quasi-peritectic: L + ε-FeSb = β + αFe (U2)		experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 6 report
546.4	quasi-peritectic: L + ε-FeSb = β + αFe (U2)	L: Sb 0.00483; ε-FeSb: Sb 0.465; β: Sb 0.01285; αFe: Sb 0.01595	model	[1] Boa 2008	Table 11, p. 12, row 5 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (6)

Phase equilibrium, Bi–Fe–Sb system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + FeSb2 alloy: Bi 0.2865, Fe 0.193, Sb 0.5205	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + FeSb2 alloy: Bi 0.32, Fe 0.213, Sb 0.467	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 5 report
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + FeSb2 + ε-FeSb alloy: Bi 0.3465, Fe 0.2335, Sb 0.42	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 4 report
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + FeSb2 + ε-FeSb alloy: Bi 0.2334, Fe 0.2999, Sb 0.4667	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 2 report
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + FeSb2 + ε-FeSb alloy: Bi 0.1667, Fe 0.2998, Sb 0.5335	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 1 report
Phase assemblage	523.15	β + αFe + ε-FeSb alloy: Bi 0.3, Fe 0.4667, Sb 0.2333	experimental	[1] Boa 2008	Table 5, p. 5, row 3 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

D. Boa, S. Hassam, G. Kra, K.P. Kotchi, J. Rogez, The ternary bismuth–iron–antimony system: Experimental phase diagram study and thermodynamic evaluation, Calphad 32, 227-239 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.01.001

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}