Bi–In–Sb system

10 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 5, model 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental5
model5
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction10

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–In–Sb system (10)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
382.35peritectic: L + (Bi, Sb) -> BiIn + InSbL: Bi 0.214407, In 0.78558, Sb 1.200e-5model[1] Cui 2002Table 2, p. 8, row 10
report
382.15eutectic: L + (Bi, Sb) -> BiIn + InSbexperimental[1] Cui 2002
cites Peretti 1961
Table 2, p. 8, row 9
report
364.85peritectic: L + (In) -> ε + InSbL: Bi 0.167576, In 0.832388, Sb 3.600e-5model[1] Cui 2002Table 2, p. 8, row 4
report
364.45peritectic: L + (In) -> ε + InSbexperimental[1] Cui 2002
cites Peretti 1961
Table 2, p. 8, row 3
report
362.15peritectic: L + BiIn -> InSb + Bi3In5experimental[1] Cui 2002
cites Peretti 1961
Table 2, p. 8, row 7
report
361.95peritectic: L + BiIn -> InSb + Bi3In5L: Bi 0.35249, In 0.647497, Sb 1.200e-5model[1] Cui 2002Table 2, p. 8, row 8
report
361.25peritectic: L + Bi3In5 -> InSb + BiIn2L: Bi 0.34105, In 0.658938, Sb 1.200e-5model[1] Cui 2002Table 2, p. 8, row 6
report
361.05peritectic: L + Bi3In5 -> InSb + BiIn2experimental[1] Cui 2002
cites Peretti 1961
Table 2, p. 8, row 5
report
344.95eutectic: L -> ε + InSb + BiIn2experimental[1] Cui 2002
cites Peretti 1961
Table 2, p. 8, row 1
report
343.75eutectic: L -> ε + InSb + BiIn2L: Bi 0.215451, In 0.784537, Sb 1.200e-5model[1] Cui 2002Table 2, p. 8, row 2
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yuwen Cui, Satoru Ishihara, Xing Jun Liu, Ikuo Ohnuma, Ryosuke Kainuma, Hiroshi Ohtani et al., Thermodynamic Calculation of Phase Diagram in the Bi-In-Sb Ternary System, Mater. Trans. 43, 1879-1886 (2002). doi:10.2320/matertrans.43.1879