Bi–Li system

29 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 19, model 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental19
model10
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction13
phase transition4
formation12

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
BiLi-13Liu.tdbY. Liu, Z. Kang, J. Wang, Thermochim. Acta, 558, 53-60(2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.01.02915b3439c7d98d6a9ed48d06ea0d9e86e501638e2a84d00eb91869b534411c7cdviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
BiLi-13Liu.tdb519.22RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Li) 0) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.14242) + BILI_L10 (x(Li) 0.5)
BiLi-13Liu.tdb453.07BILI3_D03 (x(Li) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.99907) + BCC_A2 (x(Li) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Li system (13)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1432congruent melting: liq <-> BiLiliq: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5; BiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Liu 2013Table 3, p. 5, row 9
report
1418congruent melting: liq <-> BiLiliq: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5; BiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
Table 3, p. 5, row 10
report
693liq + BiLi3 <-> βBiLiBiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; βBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 8
report
688liq + BiLi3 <-> βBiLiliq: Li 0.36; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; βBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
Table 3, p. 5, row 7
report
688peritecticexperimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
p. 2
report
From both thermal analysis and electrical resistivity measurement, Gruber et al. [8] identified two invariant reactions at 688 and 673 K, respectively, which were related with the peritectic melting of BiLi and the allotropic transformation of BiLi, respectively.
688liq + BiLi3 <-> βBiLiliq: Li 0.36; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; βBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Liu 2013Table 3, p. 5, row 6
report
673liq + BiLi3 <-> αBiLiliq: Li 0.37; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; αBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
673liq + BiLi3 <-> αBiLiBiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; αBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 5
report
672.3liq + BiLi3 <-> αBiLiliq: Li 0.35; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75; αBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Liu 2013Table 3, p. 5, row 3
report
519.2liq <-> Bi + αBiLiliq: Li 0.14; αBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Liu 2013Table 3, p. 5, row 1
report
516liq <-> Bi + αBiLiliq: Li 0.14; αBiLi: Bi 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
Table 3, p. 5, row 2
report
453.1liq <-> BiLi3 + Liliq: Li 0.999; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75model[1] Liu 2013Table 3, p. 5, row 11
report
448liq <-> BiLi3 + Liliq: Li 0.99; BiLi3: Bi 0.25, Li 0.75experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
Table 3, p. 5, row 12
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Bi–Li system (7)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
BiLiBiLi-48.55 kJ/mol-atommodel-36.049 (mp-aaaabhww)-37.398 (oqmd-28740)[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
BiLiBiLi-46.3 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-36.049 (mp-aaaabhww)-37.398 (oqmd-28740)[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
BiLiBiLi-35.5 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-36.049 (mp-aaaabhww)-37.398 (oqmd-28740)[1] Liu 2013
cites Sommer 1982
Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
BiLi3BiLi3-70.75 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-51.091 (mp-aaaabije)-52.899 (oqmd-10938)[1] Liu 2013
cites Foster 1964 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
BiLi3BiLi3-67.575 kJ/mol-atommodel-51.091 (mp-aaaabije)-52.899 (oqmd-10938)[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
BiLi3BiLi3-63.85 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-51.091 (mp-aaaabije)-52.899 (oqmd-10938)[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
BiLi3BiLi3-62.825 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental-51.091 (mp-aaaabije)-52.899 (oqmd-10938)[1] Liu 2013
cites Seith 1937
Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report

Other properties

Phase transition (4)

Phase transition, Bi–Li system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition673 K673polymorphicexperimental[1] Liu 2013p. 1
report
BiLi has an allotropic transformation around 673 K.
Phase transition673 K673polymorphicexperimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Grube 1934
p. 2
report
From both thermal analysis and electrical resistivity measurement, Gruber et al. [8] identified two invariant reactions at 688 and 673 K, respectively, which were related with the peritectic melting of BiLi and the allotropic transformation of BiLi, respectively.
Phase transition688 K688BiLi + BiLi3 + liquidexperimental[1] Liu 2013p. 1
report
In addition, BiLi melts incongruently, with the formation of Bi-Li melts and BiLi3 when the temperature is raised above 688 K.
Phase transition1418 K1418congruent meltingmodel[1] Liu 2013
cites Sangster 1991 doi
p. 1
report
BiLi3 melts congruently around 1418 K, and the liquidus around BiLi3 shows a certain degree of steepness, indicating the presence of short-range ordering for the melts around such a composition.

Formation (5)

Formation, Bi–Li system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
-15.55 J/mol-atom/KBiLi
alloy: Li 0.5
model[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
-18.175 J/mol-atom/KBiLi3
alloy: Li 0.75
model[1] Liu 2013Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
-12.25 J/mol-atom/K298.15BiLi
alloy: Li 0.5
experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
-22.5 J/mol-atom/K298.15BiLi3
alloy: Li 0.75
experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Foster 1964 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
-14.725 J/mol-atom/K298.15BiLi3
alloy: Li 0.75
experimental[1] Liu 2013
cites Weppner 1978 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yajun Liu, Zhitao Kang, Jiang Wang, Thermodynamic basis and related phase equilibria for Bi–Li and Bi–Na binary systems, Thermochimica Acta 558, 53-60 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.01.029