# Bi–Sb–Zn system > Bi–Sb–Zn system: 19 accepted literature values (invariant reaction 19) and 0 calculated phase diagram(s) from ORCHID, each value with evidence class, source, page and quote. HTML: https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/BI-SB-ZN.html · Markdown: https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/BI-SB-ZN.md 19 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 1, model 18); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). Data: [JSON](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/systems/BI-SB-ZN.json) · [CSV](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/BI-SB-ZN.csv) · [interactive explorer](https://orchid-project.org/data-explorer/#BI-SB-ZN) · [papers (bibliography)](https://data.orchid-project.org/bibliography/pages/systems/BI-SB-ZN.html) · [Markdown](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/BI-SB-ZN.md) Table: Accepted values by evidence class | Evidence class | Values | |---|---:| | experimental | 1 | | model | 18 | Table: Accepted values by property group | Property group | Values | |---|---:| | invariant reaction | 19 | ## Invariant reactions (literature) Table: Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Sb–Zn system (19) | T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote | |---:|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 810.41 | other: β-Zn9Sb7 + β-Zn3Sb2 ↔ L + α-Zn9Sb7 | L: Bi 0.1313, Zn 0.4783 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 1; `ORC-ZQUZ6U7RJ7` | | | 806.65 | quasi-peritectic: L + β-Zn9Sb7 ↔ α-Zn9Sb7 + SbZn | L: Bi 0.1415, Zn 0.4421 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 3; `ORC-J4XXGMYMX6` | | | 801.01 | peritectic: δ-Zn4Sb3 + SbZn ↔ L + γ-Zn6Sb5 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 2; `ORC-ASDTBAQUMI` | | | 795.32 | peritectic: L + β-Zn3Sb2 + α-Zn9Sb7 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 | L: Bi 0.1963, Zn 0.4545 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 4; `ORC-2VBWHGGZ36` | | | 785.12 | quasi-peritectic: L + α-Zn9Sb7 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + SbZn | L: Bi 0.2469, Zn 0.3991 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 6; `ORC-CLKJPSUH36` | | | 764.91 | L + δ-Zn4Sb3 + γ-Zn6Sb5 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 5; `ORC-TG2VXN4IOZ` | | | 764.56 | L + γ-Zn6Sb5 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + SbZn | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 7; `ORC-SNP63JLELN` | | | 712.64 | L + ζ-Zn6Sb4 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + η-Zn3Sb2 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 9; `ORC-T3XM3FZTM3` | | | 705.74 | quasi-peritectic: L + β-Zn3Sb2 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + α-Zn3Sb2 | L: Bi 0.41, Zn 0.4741 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 8; `ORC-MKXIWAKCNE` | | | 684.75 | eutectic: L ↔ L2 + Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2 | L: Bi 0.0093, Zn 0.9712 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 10; `ORC-DFRKFG5MA6` | | | 684.75 | quasi-peritectic: L + L2 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 12; `ORC-UFWYYSGGYR` | | | 683.91 | L + L2 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 13; `ORC-O3FZJDM2D2` | | | 683.91 | L ↔ L2 + Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2 | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 11; `ORC-X2TFQPX6CJ` | | | 677.83 | quasi-peritectic: L + α-Zn3Sb2 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Hcp(Zn) | L: Bi 0.2898, Zn 0.6185 | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 14; `ORC-LWDETZBVAM` | | | 537.19 | L + SbZn ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb) | | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 16; `ORC-B3RZT6PWPK` | | | 536.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + SbZn ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb) | | experimental | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 15; `ORC-2C4YECUZ2A` | | | 531.23 | L + SbZn ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + Rho(Sb) | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 17; `ORC-RGBPBUASES` | | | 527.93 | quasi-peritectic: L + ε-Zn4Sb3 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + Rho(Sb) | | model | [1] Zhang 2022; _cites Minic 2010_ [doi](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.078) | Table 9, p. 15, row 19; `ORC-5BC2TC5Y2T` | | | 527.64 | eutectic: L ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb) + Hcp(Zn) | | model | [1] Zhang 2022 | Table 9, p. 15, row 18; `ORC-YG2KLQ67C5` | | ## Sources Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row). 1. Jiyuan Zhang, Yuan Yuan, A coupled experimental and thermodynamic assessment of the Mg-Bi-Sb and Zn-Bi-Sb ternary system and extrapolate to the Mg-Bi-Zn-Sb system, Thermochimica Acta 716, 179327 (2022). [doi:10.1016/j.tca.2022.179327](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2022.179327) ## Please cite - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569 - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065 Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes. ```bibtex @misc{orchid_literature_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } @misc{orchid_data_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } ``` --- Derived data CC BY 4.0 ([licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)): cite ORCHID ([CITATION.cff](https://data.orchid-project.org/CITATION.cff)) and the original sources. Quotes are short excerpts kept so that each value can be checked; they remain under the publishers' copyright and are not relicensed. Source papers, page images and full text are not redistributed. Field reference: [SCHEMA.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/SCHEMA.md). Machine-readable guide: [llms.txt](https://data.orchid-project.org/llms.txt). Found an error? The report link of a value (Markdown: its id, ORC-..., in the Location column) opens a pre-filled GitHub issue, https://github.com/orchid-calphad/orchid-data/issues/new?template=report-value-error.yml&record_id=\, carrying only the record id, source and value; [how to contribute](https://orchid-project.org/contribute/).