Bi–Tm system
50 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 16, model 24, DFT 2, unspecified 8); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 6 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (7) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 16 |
| model | 24 |
| DFT | 2 |
| unspecified | 8 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 28 |
| phase transition | 2 |
| formation | 8 |
| crystal structure | 12 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | C.P. Wang, H.L. Zhang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, J. Alloys Compd., 502, 43-48(2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.042 | 0fe52d02cf6d5c2ad74ce147909174a5e41e02a6a22627cc3b640195c1103d56 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | Y. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, S. Ugur, G. Ugur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Calphad, 48, 72-78(2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002 | eece954098bcef12dede70e60c852e8135c3733a46598c8d9231291def4644f1 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 1687.37 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69504) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 1687.36 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69522) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 1687.36 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69524) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 1409.88 | BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.82579) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98985) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 1409.88 | BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.82583) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98985) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 538.89 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02086) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| BiTm-10Wan.tdb | 538.89 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02074) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 1686.53 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70462) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 1686.53 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70471) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 1686.53 | BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70458) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 1403.14 | BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.81079) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.99069) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 535.12 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02323) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
| BiTm-15Dja.tdb | 535.12 | RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02301) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull BiTm-10Wan
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2053.15 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| 2053 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 5 report | |
| 2020.05 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report | |
| 2013.15 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2010 | Table 4, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| 2013 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report | |
| 2010.15 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| 2010 | congruent melting: L <-> BiTm | L: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 6 report | |
| 1783.15 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| 1783 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report | |
| 1690.15 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| 1690 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report | |
| 1687.15 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.695; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [1] Wang 2010 | Table 4, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| 1687 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.695; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 11 report | |
| 1686.5 | peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.704; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 5, p. 6, row 12 report | |
| 1413.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.81; (Tm): Tm 0.99; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| 1413 | eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.99 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 13 report | |
| 1410.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5 | L: Tm 0.825; (Tm): Tm 0.99; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [1] Wang 2010 | Table 4, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| 1410.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5 | Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| 1410 | eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.825; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.99 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 15 report | |
| 1410 | eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | unspecified | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 14 report | |
| 1403.1 | eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm) | L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.991 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 5, p. 6, row 16 report | |
| 541.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| 541 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | unspecified | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report | |
| 539.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| 539.15 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | L: Tm 0.021; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2010 | Table 4, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| 539 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report | |
| 539 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | L: Tm 0.021; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 3 report | |
| 535.1 | eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm | L: Tm 0.023; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 5, p. 6, row 4 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bi3Tm5 | Bi3Tm5 | -73.565 kJ/mol-atom | model | -59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi) | -60.919 (oqmd-28780) | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report | ||
| Bi3Tm5 | Bi3Tm5 | -68 kJ/mol-atom | model | -59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi) | -60.919 (oqmd-28780) | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report | ||
| Bi3Tm5 | Bi3Tm5 | -60.85 kJ/mol-atom | model | -59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi) | -60.919 (oqmd-28780) | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report | ||
| Bi3Tm5 | -60.751 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report | ||||
| BiTm | BiTm | -99 kJ/mol-atom | model | -74.592 (mp-aaaabijq) | -77.416 (oqmd-1926383) | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Wang 2010 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report | ||
| BiTm | BiTm | -76.796 kJ/mol-atom | model | -74.592 (mp-aaaabijq) | -77.416 (oqmd-1926383) | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report | ||
| BiTm | -76.501 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report | ||||
| BiTm | BiTm | -73 kJ/mol-atom | model | -74.592 (mp-aaaabijq) | -77.416 (oqmd-1926383) | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (2)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 2010.15 K | 2010.15 | BiTm | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi | p. 3 report | However, more recently Abulkhaev [25] have studied the Bi-Tm phase diagram by means of differential thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction and microstructural analysis, and reported there are two eutectic reactions of the L ↔ (Bi) + BiTm at 268 ± 5 ◦ C and L ↔ (Tm) + Bi3 Tm5 at 1137 ± 10 ◦ C, and a peritectic reaction of the L + BiTm ↔ Bi3 Tm5 at 1417 ± 15 ◦ C, and the compound BiTm melts at 1737 ±… |
| Phase transition | 2053.15 K | 2053.15 | BiTm | experimental | [1] Wang 2010 cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi | p. 3 report | In this system, there are two eutectic reactions of the L ↔ (Bi) + BiTm at 266 ◦ C and L ↔ (Tm) + Bi3 Tm5 at 1140 ◦ C, and a peritectic reaction of the L + BiTm ↔ Bi3 Tm5 at 1510 ◦ C, and the compound BiTm melts at 1780 ◦ C, and the bismuth solubility in thulium is about 1 at.%. |
Crystal structure (12)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 8.163 Å | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report | ||
| Lattice a | 6.27 Å | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report | ||
| Lattice a | 8.064 Å | 298.15 | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report | |
| Lattice a | 6.188 Å | 298.15 | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report | |
| Lattice b | 9.447 Å | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report | ||
| Lattice b | 6.27 Å | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report | ||
| Lattice b | 9.305 Å | 298.15 | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report | |
| Lattice b | 6.188 Å | 298.15 | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report | |
| Lattice c | 11.868 Å | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report | ||
| Lattice c | 6.27 Å | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | model | [2] Djaballah 2015 | Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report | ||
| Lattice c | 11.758 Å | 298.15 | Bi3Tm5 Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report | |
| Lattice c | 6.188 Å | 298.15 | BiTm BiTm: Tm 0.5 | experimental | [2] Djaballah 2015 cites Yoshihara 1975 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- C.P. Wang, H.L. Zhang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the Bi–Nd and Bi–Tm systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 502, 43-48 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.042
- Y. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, Ş. Uğur, G. Uğur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic description of the Bi–Cs and Bi–Tm system supported by first-principles calculations, Calphad 48, 72-78 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002