Bi–Tm system

50 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 16, model 24, DFT 2, unspecified 8); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 6 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (7) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental16
model24
DFT2
unspecified8
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction28
phase transition2
formation8
crystal structure12

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
BiTm-10Wan.tdbC.P. Wang, H.L. Zhang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, J. Alloys Compd., 502, 43-48(2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.0420fe52d02cf6d5c2ad74ce147909174a5e41e02a6a22627cc3b640195c1103d56viewer · TDB · JSON
BiTm-15Dja.tdbY. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, S. Ugur, G. Ugur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Calphad, 48, 72-78(2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002eece954098bcef12dede70e60c852e8135c3733a46598c8d9231291def4644f1viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
BiTm-10Wan.tdb1687.37BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69504)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb1687.36BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69522)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb1687.36BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.69524)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb1409.88BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.82579) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98985)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb1409.88BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.82583) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.98985)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb538.89RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02086) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)
BiTm-10Wan.tdb538.89RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02074) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb1686.53BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70462)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb1686.53BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70471)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb1686.53BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5) + BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.70458)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb1403.14BI3TM5 (x(Tm) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.81079) + HCP_A3 (x(Tm) 0.99069)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb535.12RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02323) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)
BiTm-15Dja.tdb535.12RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Tm) 0) + LIQUID (x(Tm) 0.02301) + BITM_B1 (x(Tm) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull BiTm-10Wan

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Tm system (28)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2053.15congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 11
report
2053congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 5
report
2020.05congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 5, p. 6, row 8
report
2013.15congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[1] Wang 2010Table 4, p. 4, row 12
report
2013congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 7
report
2010.15congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5unspecified[1] Wang 2010
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 10
report
2010congruent melting: L <-> BiTmL: Tm 0.5; BiTm: Tm 0.5unspecified[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 6
report
1783.15peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625experimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
1783peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 9
report
1690.15peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[1] Wang 2010
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
1690peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 10
report
1687.15peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5L: Tm 0.695; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625model[1] Wang 2010Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
1687peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5L: Tm 0.695; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625model[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 11
report
1686.5peritectic: L + BiTm <-> Bi3Tm5L: Tm 0.704; BiTm: Tm 0.5; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 5, p. 6, row 12
report
1413.15eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5L: Tm 0.81; (Tm): Tm 0.99; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625experimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
1413eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.99experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 13
report
1410.15eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5L: Tm 0.825; (Tm): Tm 0.99; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625model[1] Wang 2010Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
1410.15eutectic: L <-> (Tm) + Bi3Tm5Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[1] Wang 2010
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
1410eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.825; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.99model[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 15
report
1410eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625unspecified[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 14
report
1403.1eutectic: L <-> Bi3Tm5 + (Tm)L: Tm 0.81; Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625; (Tm): Tm 0.991model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 5, p. 6, row 16
report
541.15eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm(Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5unspecified[1] Wang 2010
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
541eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm(Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5unspecified[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 2
report
539.15eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm(Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5experimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
539.15eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTmL: Tm 0.021; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[1] Wang 2010Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
539eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTm(Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 1
report
539eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTmL: Tm 0.021; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 3
report
535.1eutectic: L <-> (Bi) + BiTmL: Tm 0.023; (Bi): Tm 0; BiTm: Tm 0.5model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 5, p. 6, row 4
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Bi–Tm system (8)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Bi3Tm5Bi3Tm5-73.565 kJ/mol-atommodel-59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi)-60.919 (oqmd-28780)[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 21
report
Bi3Tm5Bi3Tm5-68 kJ/mol-atommodel-59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi)-60.919 (oqmd-28780)[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 20
report
Bi3Tm5Bi3Tm5-60.85 kJ/mol-atommodel-59.592 (mp-aaacqtbi)-60.919 (oqmd-28780)[2] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 23
report
Bi3Tm5-60.751 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 22
report
BiTmBiTm-99 kJ/mol-atommodel-74.592 (mp-aaaabijq)-77.416 (oqmd-1926383)[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Wang 2010 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 17
report
BiTmBiTm-76.796 kJ/mol-atommodel-74.592 (mp-aaaabijq)-77.416 (oqmd-1926383)[2] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 19
report
BiTm-76.501 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Djaballah 2015Table 2, p. 4, row 18
report
BiTmBiTm-73 kJ/mol-atommodel-74.592 (mp-aaaabijq)-77.416 (oqmd-1926383)[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 16
report

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, Bi–Tm system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition2010.15 K2010.15BiTmexperimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abulkhaev 2003 doi
p. 3
report
However, more recently Abulkhaev [25] have studied the Bi-Tm phase diagram by means of differential thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction and microstructural analysis, and reported there are two eutectic reactions of the L ↔ (Bi) + BiTm at 268 ± 5 ◦ C and L ↔ (Tm) + Bi3 Tm5 at 1137 ± 10 ◦ C, and a peritectic reaction of the L + BiTm ↔ Bi3 Tm5 at 1417 ± 15 ◦ C, and the compound BiTm melts at 1737 ±…
Phase transition2053.15 K2053.15BiTmexperimental[1] Wang 2010
cites Abdusalyamova 1996 doi
p. 3
report
In this system, there are two eutectic reactions of the L ↔ (Bi) + BiTm at 266 ◦ C and L ↔ (Tm) + Bi3 Tm5 at 1140 ◦ C, and a peritectic reaction of the L + BiTm ↔ Bi3 Tm5 at 1510 ◦ C, and the compound BiTm melts at 1780 ◦ C, and the bismuth solubility in thulium is about 1 at.%.

Crystal structure (12)

Crystal structure, Bi–Tm system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a8.163 ÅBi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
Lattice a6.27 ÅBiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
Lattice a8.064 Å298.15Bi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
Lattice a6.188 Å298.15BiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
Lattice b9.447 ÅBi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
Lattice b6.27 ÅBiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
Lattice b9.305 Å298.15Bi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
Lattice b6.188 Å298.15BiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
Lattice c11.868 ÅBi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
Lattice c6.27 ÅBiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
model[2] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
Lattice c11.758 Å298.15Bi3Tm5
Bi3Tm5: Tm 0.625
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
Lattice c6.188 Å298.15BiTm
BiTm: Tm 0.5
experimental[2] Djaballah 2015
cites Yoshihara 1975 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. C.P. Wang, H.L. Zhang, A.T. Tang, F.S. Pan, X.J. Liu, Thermodynamic assessments of the Bi–Nd and Bi–Tm systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 502, 43-48 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.042
  2. Y. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, Ş. Uğur, G. Uğur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic description of the Bi–Cs and Bi–Tm system supported by first-principles calculations, Calphad 48, 72-78 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002