C–Ce–La–Pr system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9, model 12, unspecified 2); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental9
model12
unspecified2
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction21
crystal structure2

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Ce–La–Pr system (21)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2544.15L <-> βLaC2 + (C)βLaC2: C 0.67experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Spedding 1959
Table 4, p. 6, row 14
report
2543.15L <-> βCeC2 + (C)βCeC2: C 0.6667; (C): C 1experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Winchell 1967 doi
Table 4, p. 6, row 26
report
2542.25L <-> βCeC2 + (C)L: C 0.689; βCeC2: C 0.6667; (C): C 1model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 25
report
2541.75L <-> βLaC2 + (C)L: C 0.701; βLaC2: C 0.663; (C): C 1model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 13
report
2527.15L <-> βPrC2 + (C)(C): C 1experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Conclusions
Table 4, p. 6, row 40
report
2521.65L <-> βPrC2 + (C)L: C 0.704; βPrC2: C 0.665; (C): C 1model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 39
report
1818.75L + βPrC2 <-> Pr2C3L: C 0.5; βPrC2: C 0.657; Pr2C3: C 0.581model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 37
report
1818.15L + βPrC2 <-> Pr2C3L: C 0.5experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Conclusions
Table 4, p. 6, row 38
report
1803.15L + βCeC2 <-> Ce2C3βCeC2: C 0.6667; Ce2C3: C 0.6experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Yupko 1970
Table 4, p. 6, row 24
report
1803.05L + βCeC2 <-> Ce2C3L: C 0.505; βCeC2: C 0.6667; Ce2C3: C 0.6model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 23
report
1688.95L + βLaC2 <-> La2C3L: C 0.5; βLaC2: C 0.645; La2C3: C 0.593model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 11
report
1688.15L + βLaC2 <-> La2C3L: C 0.506; βLaC2: C 0.631; La2C3: C 0.6experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Spedding 1959
Table 4, p. 6, row 12
report
1354.95βLaC2 <-> La2C3 + αLaC2βLaC2: C 0.662; La2C3: C 0.599; αLaC2: C 0.667; LaC2C3: C 0.599model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 7
report
1148.15L + (γLa) <-> (βLa)L: C 0.057; (γLa): C 0.028; (βLa): C 0.038experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Spedding 1959
Table 4, p. 6, row 6
report
1146.55L + (γLa) <-> (βLa)L: C 0.063; (γLa): C 0.025; (βLa): C 0.028model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 5
report
1080.05L <-> (βLa) + La2C3L: C 0.209; (βLa): C 0.045; La2C3: C 0.578model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 3
report
1079.15L <-> (βLa) + La2C3L: C 0.206; (βLa): C 0.044; La2C3: C 0.548experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Spedding 1959
Table 4, p. 6, row 4
report
1073.15L <-> (βPr) + Pr2C3L: C 0.15experimental[1] Peng 2011
cites Conclusions
Table 4, p. 6, row 32
report
1071.05L <-> (βPr) + Pr2C3L: C 0.155; (βPr): C 0.077; Pr2C3: C 0.544model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 31
report
1017.15L + (δCe) <-> (γCe)L: C 0.062; (δCe): C 0.013; (γCe): C 0.019model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 18
report
911.45L <-> (γCe) + Ce2C3L: C 0.192; (γCe): C 0.044; Ce2C3: C 0.6model[1] Peng 2011Table 4, p. 6, row 17
report

Other properties

Crystal structure (2)

Crystal structure, C–Ce–La–Pr system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a2.52 Å298.15(C)
alloy: Ce 0, La 0, Pr 0
unspecified[1] Peng 2011
cites Fayos 1999 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report
Lattice c4.12 Å298.15(C)
alloy: Ce 0, La 0, Pr 0
unspecified[1] Peng 2011
cites Fayos 1999 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yingbiao Peng, Yong Du, Lijun Zhang, Chunsheng Sha, Shuhong Liu, Feng Zheng et al., Thermodynamic modeling of the C–RE (RE=La, Ce and Pr) systems, Calphad 35, 533-541 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.002