C–Fe–Mo system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (model 23); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
model	23

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	23

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Fe–Mo system (23)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2802	L+MC1-x -> MC(h)+M2C	L: C 0.362539, Fe 0.008171, Mo 0.629291; MC1-x: C 0.395109, Fe 0.002245, Mo 0.602646; MC(h): C 0.374762, Fe 0, Mo 0.625238; M2C: C 0.325695, Fe 0.026011, Mo 0.648294; MC(η): C 0.374762, Fe 0, Mo 0.625238	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 1 report
2196	M2C+MC(h)+G -> MC1-x	M2C: C 0.331883, Fe 0.038371, Mo 0.629746; MC(h): C 0.409232, Fe 0, Mo 0.590768; MC1-x: C 0.431075, Fe 0.002777, Mo 0.566148; MC(η): C 0.409232, Fe 0, Mo 0.590768	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 3 report
1902	L+bcc+M2C -> M6C	L: C 0.079434, Fe 0.450812, Mo 0.469755; bcc: C 6.900e-4, Fe 0.095775, Mo 0.903535; M2C: C 0.198389, Fe 0.171191, Mo 0.63042; M6C: C 0.142978, Fe 0.458794, Mo 0.398227	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 4 report
1808	L+bcc -> σ+M6C	L: C 0.043845, Fe 0.526161, Mo 0.429994; bcc: C 2.230e-4, Fe 0.167367, Mo 0.83241; M6C: C 0.143041, Fe 0.45794, Mo 0.399018	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 5 report
1728	L+σ -> R+M6C	L: C 0.02748, Fe 0.655314, Mo 0.317205; M6C: C 0.142846, Fe 0.466791, Mo 0.390363	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 6 report
1670	L+R -> bcc+M6C	L: C 0.023128, Fe 0.733184, Mo 0.243688; bcc: C 7.540e-4, Fe 0.777891, Mo 0.221355; M6C: C 0.142833, Fe 0.473126, Mo 0.384041	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 7 report
1641	R+σ+M6C -> μ	M6C: C 0.142836, Fe 0.448158, Mo 0.409007	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 8 report
1618	L+bcc -> fcc+M6C	L: C 0.065251, Fe 0.819006, Mo 0.115744; bcc: C 0.005329, Fe 0.930444, Mo 0.064227; fcc: C 0.016726, Fe 0.926259, Mo 0.057015; M6C: C 0.14299, Fe 0.51293, Mo 0.34408	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 9 report
1513	M6C+σ -> bcc+μ	M6C: C 0.142821, Fe 0.402838, Mo 0.454341; bcc: C 0, Fe 0.066963, Mo 0.933037	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 10 report
1474	μ -> bcc+R+M6C	bcc: C 0, Fe 0.859611, Mo 0.140389; M6C: C 0.142722, Fe 0.443365, Mo 0.413913	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 11 report
1399	L+fcc+G -> cem	L: C 0.17731, Fe 0.800646, Mo 0.022044; fcc: C 0.085741, Fe 0.909573, Mo 0.004686; cem: C 0.241029, Fe 0.749452, Mo 0.009519	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 12 report
1365	L+M6C -> fcc+M2C	L: C 0.168567, Fe 0.738537, Mo 0.092896; M6C: C 0.142933, Fe 0.490012, Mo 0.367056; fcc: C 0.06717, Fe 0.910798, Mo 0.022032; M2C: C 0.332343, Fe 0.129335, Mo 0.538322	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 13 report
1359	L+G+M2C -> ξ	L: C 0.189376, Fe 0.724456, Mo 0.086167; M2C: C 0.33242, Fe 0.138625, Mo 0.528955; ξ: C 0.249831, Fe 0.518985, Mo 0.231184	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 14 report
1350	L+M2C -> fcc+ξ	L: C 0.173754, Fe 0.737564, Mo 0.088682; M2C: C 0.332234, Fe 0.13008, Mo 0.537686; fcc: C 0.071303, Fe 0.908613, Mo 0.020084; ξ: C 0.249904, Fe 0.515994, Mo 0.234103	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 15 report
1348	L+G -> cem+ξ	L: C 0.187192, Fe 0.732325, Mo 0.080483; cem: C 0.249921, Fe 0.712554, Mo 0.037526; ξ: C 0.25018, Fe 0.521229, Mo 0.228591	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 16 report
1337	L -> ξ+cem+fcc	L: C 0.180572, Fe 0.742089, Mo 0.077338; ξ: C 0.250059, Fe 0.522137, Mo 0.227804; cem: C 0.249945, Fe 0.714177, Mo 0.035878; fcc: C 0.077801, Fe 0.905763, Mo 0.016436	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 17 report
1183	fcc+cem -> ξ+G	fcc: C 0.055807, Fe 0.938603, Mo 0.005589; cem: C 0.249858, Fe 0.732316, Mo 0.017827; ξ: C 0.250117, Fe 0.533713, Mo 0.21617	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 18 report
1172	bcc+μ+M6C -> Lave	bcc: C 0, Fe 0.948075, Mo 0.051925; M6C: C 0.142639, Fe 0.378235, Mo 0.479126	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 19 report
1083	fcc+M6C -> bcc+M2C	fcc: C 0.016587, Fe 0.977875, Mo 0.005537; M6C: C 0.142714, Fe 0.410981, Mo 0.446305; bcc: C 7.010e-4, Fe 0.991754, Mo 0.007545; M2C: C 0.333298, Fe 0.042132, Mo 0.62457	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 20 report
1059	fcc+M2C -> bcc+ξ	fcc: C 0.020194, Fe 0.975727, Mo 0.004079; M2C: C 0.333183, Fe 0.042948, Mo 0.62387; bcc: C 7.460e-4, Fe 0.993881, Mo 0.005373; ξ: C 0.249829, Fe 0.521434, Mo 0.228737	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 21 report
1012	fcc+ξ -> bcc+G	fcc: C 0.031325, Fe 0.967311, Mo 0.001364; ξ: C 0.284576, Fe 0.515222, Mo 0.200202; bcc: C 8.840e-4, Fe 0.997544, Mo 0.001572	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 22 report
957	bcc+ξ+M2C -> MC(shp)	bcc: C 2.330e-4, Fe 0.997435, Mo 0.002332; ξ: C 0.249943, Fe 0.527828, Mo 0.222229; M2C: C 0.333156, Fe 0.023764, Mo 0.64308; MC(shp): C 0.500099, Fe 0, Mo 0.499901	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 23 report
926	bcc+ξ -> G+MC(shp)	bcc: C 2.790e-4, Fe 0.998789, Mo 9.320e-4; ξ: C 0.249831, Fe 0.542937, Mo 0.207233; MC(shp): C 0.500099, Fe 0, Mo 0.499901	model	[1] Andersson 1988	Table I, p. 10, row 24 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jan-Olof Andersson, A thermodynamic evaluation of the FeMoC system, Calphad 12, 9-23 (1988). doi:10.1016/0364-5916(88)90025-9

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}