C–Fe–W system

98 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 51, model 47); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	51
model	47

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	35
phase equilibrium	63

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Fe–W system (35)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Class	Source	Location
2798	L + MC1-x/W2C + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 1 report
2673	L + M2C/bcc + WC	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 19 report
1973	L + WC + bcc/M6C	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 21 report
1893	L + WC + bcc/M6C	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Lugscheider 1982	Table I, p. 5, row 22 report
1872	L + WC + bcc/M6C	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 23 report
1852	L + M2C + bcc/M6C	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 2 report
1801	L + M2C + WC/M6C	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 3 report
1778	L + bcc/M6C + μ	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 5 report
1773	L + bcc/M6C + μ	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 4 report
1665	L + μ/M6C + bcc	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 8 report
1653	L + μ/M6C + bcc	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Takeda 1931	Table I, p. 5, row 7 report
1653	L + μ/M6C + bcc	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 6 report
1614	L + bcc/M6C + fcc	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 12 report
1613	L + bcc/M6C + fcc	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Shevchuk 1978	Table I, p. 5, row 11 report
1608	L + bcc/M6C + fcc	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Takeda 1931	Table I, p. 5, row 10 report
1608	L + bcc/M6C + fcc	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 9 report
1547	L + M6C/fcc + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 14 report
1534	L + M2C/bcc + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 20 report
1493	L + gr/WC + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 27 report
1473	L + M6C/fcc + WC	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 13 report
1423	L + gr/WC + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Shevchuk 1978	Table I, p. 5, row 28 report
1416	L/fcc + WC + gr	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites L 1980	Table I, p. 5, row 15 report
1413	L/fcc + WC + gr	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 16 report
1412	L/fcc + WC + cem	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 26 report
1410	L + gr/WC + cem	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 29 report
1408	L/fcc + WC + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites L 1980	Table I, p. 5, row 25 report
1395	L/fcc + M6C + cem	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 33 report
1389	L/fcc + M6C + gr	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 34 report
1358	L/fcc + M6C + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites L 1980	Table I, p. 5, row 32 report
1358	L/fcc + WC + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Jellinghaus 1968 doi	Table I, p. 5, row 24 report
1358	L/fcc + M6C + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Takeda 1931	Table I, p. 5, row 30 report
1323	L/fcc + M6C + cem	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Shevchuk 1978	Table I, p. 5, row 31 report
1121	fcc + M6C/bcc + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 17 report
1011	fcc/bcc + gr + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 18 report
1000	fcc/bcc + cem + WC	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table I, p. 5, row 35 report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (63)

Phase equilibrium, C–Fe–W system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.012975, Fe 0.974526, W 0.012499	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 5 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013069, Fe 0.974433, W 0.012498	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 6 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.024836, Fe 0.96897, W 0.006194	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 13 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.032972, Fe 0.961117, W 0.00591	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 16 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.020812, Fe 0.9763, W 0.002888	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 7 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.021368, Fe 0.972666, W 0.005966	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 9 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.012147, Fe 0.984945, W 0.002908	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 1 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.020767, Fe 0.976345, W 0.002888	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 8 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.025063, Fe 0.968744, W 0.006193	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 14 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.022188, Fe 0.965404, W 0.012408	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 12 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.012193, Fe 0.984899, W 0.002908	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 2 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.021232, Fe 0.972802, W 0.005966	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 10 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.022419, Fe 0.965176, W 0.012405	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 11 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.012464, Fe 0.981528, W 0.006008	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 3 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.012464, Fe 0.981528, W 0.006008	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 4 report
Phase composition	1273	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.033062, Fe 0.961028, W 0.00591	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Uhrenius 1971	Table II, p. 8, row 15 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.01376, Fe 0.980146, W 0.006095	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 21 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.020611, Fe 0.96807, W 0.011319	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 31 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.019687, Fe 0.968987, W 0.011327	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 32 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013806, Fe 0.9801, W 0.006094	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 27 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.015136, Fe 0.966527, W 0.018338	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 26 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.014111, Fe 0.974512, W 0.011377	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 23 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.014267, Fe 0.979641, W 0.006092	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 28 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006268, Fe 0.982284, W 0.011448	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 19 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.014624, Fe 0.974003, W 0.011373	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 29 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.014764, Fe 0.973865, W 0.011371	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 30 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006268, Fe 0.982284, W 0.011448	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 18 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.01523, Fe 0.966433, W 0.018336	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 25 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006221, Fe 0.98233, W 0.011448	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 17 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006316, Fe 0.982237, W 0.011448	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 20 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.014484, Fe 0.974142, W 0.011374	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 24 report
Phase composition	1323	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.01399, Fe 0.979916, W 0.006094	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 22 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013298, Fe 0.980605, W 0.006097	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 46 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.01927, Fe 0.969399, W 0.011331	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 62 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.016844, Fe 0.977077, W 0.00608	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 54 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006788, Fe 0.981769, W 0.011443	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 42 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013206, Fe 0.980697, W 0.006097	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 45 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.016951, Fe 0.971697, W 0.011352	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 52 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.015741, Fe 0.978174, W 0.006085	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 49 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013877, Fe 0.974743, W 0.011379	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 47 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.016476, Fe 0.977442, W 0.006082	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 50 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.007086, Fe 0.974459, W 0.018455	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 38 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.017369, Fe 0.971283, W 0.011348	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 56 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006521, Fe 0.98735, W 0.00613	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 39 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.018677, Fe 0.975252, W 0.006071	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 59 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.017044, Fe 0.971605, W 0.011351	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 51 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.018723, Fe 0.975206, W 0.006071	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 60 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.018992, Fe 0.969675, W 0.011333	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 61 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.007086, Fe 0.974459, W 0.018455	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 43 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006381, Fe 0.987489, W 0.00613	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 33 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006567, Fe 0.987303, W 0.006129	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 40 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.013691, Fe 0.974928, W 0.011381	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 48 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.019872, Fe 0.968803, W 0.011325	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 66 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.019318, Fe 0.974614, W 0.006068	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 64 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.017416, Fe 0.971237, W 0.011347	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 55 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.020057, Fe 0.96862, W 0.011324	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 65 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.018063, Fe 0.963642, W 0.018295	model	[1] Gustafson 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 58 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006894, Fe 0.974648, W 0.018458	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 37 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.016935, Fe 0.976985, W 0.006079	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 53 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.018157, Fe 0.963549, W 0.018294	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 57 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006788, Fe 0.981769, W 0.011443	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 35 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.006741, Fe 0.981816, W 0.011444	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 41 report
Phase composition	1398	Fcc + fcc Fcc: C 0.019272, Fe 0.97466, W 0.006068	experimental	[1] Gustafson 1987 cites Greenbank 1987	Table II, p. 8, row 63 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Per Gustafson, A thermodynamic evaluation of the C−Fe−W system, Metall Trans A 18, 175-188 (1987). doi:10.1007/bf02825699

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}