C–Mo–Ti system

4 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 2, model 2); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	2
model	2

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	4

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Mo–Ti system (4)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
2773	Liquid + MoC(η) = MC + M2C		experimental	[1] Shim 1996 cites Rudy 1996	Table III, p. 11, row 2 report
2767	Liquid + MoC(η) = MC + M2C	MoC(η): C 0.36, Mo 0.63; MC: C 0.36, Mo 0.59; M2C: C 0.32, Mo 0.67; liq: C 0.32, Mo 0.66; MoC (η): C 0.36, Mo 0.63	model	[1] Shim 1996	Table III, p. 11, row 1 report
2433	Liquid = bcc + MC + M2C	liq: C 0.19	experimental	[1] Shim 1996 cites Rudy 1996	Table III, p. 11, row 4 report
2428	Liquid = bcc + MC + M2C	bcc: C 0.19, Mo 0.97; MC: C 0.37, Mo 0.45; M2C: C 0.29, Mo 0.68; liq: C 0.19, Mo 0.75	model	[1] Shim 1996	Table III, p. 11, row 3 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jae-Hyeok Shim, Chang-Seok Oh, Dong Nyung Lee, A thermodynamic evaluation of the Ti-Mo-C system, Metall Mater Trans B 27, 955-966 (1996). doi:10.1007/s11663-996-0009-8

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}