C–Nb system

56 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 30, model 13, DFT 13); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (6) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental30
model13
DFT13
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction25
phase transition2
formation3
heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy16
crystal structure10

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull NbC-01Lee · CALPHAD hull NbC-13Khv · CALPHAD hull NbC-90Hua · CALPHAD hull NbC-97Hua-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Nb system (25)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
3886congruent melting: NbC = LiquidNbC: C 0.45model[1] Huang 1990Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
3886congruent melting: NbC = LiquidNbC: C 0.44experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites RUDY 1968
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
3873congruent melting: NbC = LiquidNbC: C 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites KIMURA 1961
Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
3773congruent melting: NbC = LiquidNbC: C 0.46experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites STORMS 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
3753congruent melting: NbC = LiquidNbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5; Liquid: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites NADLER 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
3673Liquid = NbC + graphiteNbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites STORMS 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
3578Liquid = NbC + graphiteLiquid: C 0.6; NbC: C 0.49experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites RUDY 1968
Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
3573Liquid = NbC + graphiteLiquid: C 0.6; NbC: C 0.49model[1] Huang 1990Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
3573Liquid = NbC + graphiteLiquid: C 0.605; NbC: C 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites KIMURA 1961
Table 1, p. 3, row 21
report
3493Liquid = NbC + graphiteNbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites NADLER 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
3493Liquid = NbC + graphiteNbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites ADELSBERG 1966
Table 1, p. 3, row 22
report
3363Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.333; Liquid: C 0.32; NbC: C 0.36experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites STORMS 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
3353Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.333333, Nb 0.666667; NbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites NADLER 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
3353Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.333; Liquid: C 0.3; NbC: C 0.36experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites KIMURA 1961
Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
3308Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.345; Liquid: C 0.3; NbC: C 0.37experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites RUDY 1968
Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
2800Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.333333, Nb 0.666667; NbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites w 1972
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
2800Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.333333, Nb 0.666667; NbC: C 0.5, Nb 0.5experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites STORMS 1990
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
2800Nb2C = Liquid + NbCNb2C: C 0.29; Liquid: C 0.15; NbC: C 0.29model[1] Huang 1990Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
2799metatectic/catatectic: L-NbC-Nb2Cmodel[1] Huang 1990p. 4
report
The calculated three phase equilibrium L-NbC-Nb2C at 2799 K is metatectic instead of the typical peritectic equilibrium, as reported in most experimental work.
2613Liquid = bcc + Nb2CLiquid: C 0.135; bcc: C 0.06; Nb2C: C 0.28experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites KIMURA 1961
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
2608Liquid = bcc + Nb2CLiquid: C 0.105; bcc: C 0.06; Nb2C: C 0.28experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites STORMS 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
2608Liquid = bcc + Nb2CLiquid: C 0.105; bcc: C 0.075; Nb2C: C 0.28experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites RUDY 1968
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
2608Liquid = bcc + Nb2CLiquid: C 0.105; bcc: C 0.053; Nb2C: C 0.28model[1] Huang 1990Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
2601Liquid = bcc + Nb2CNb2C: C 0.333333, Nb 0.666667experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites NADLER 1960
Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
2503Liquid = bcc + Nb2CLiquid: C 0.105; bcc: C 0.06; Nb2C: C 0.31experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites ELLIOTT 1961
Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, C–Nb system (3)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Nb3C34.3728 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Nb5C2-15.8511 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
Nb7C315.1964 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, C–Nb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition2800 K2800Nb2Cexperimental[1] Huang 1990p. 2
report
Nb2C decomposes close to 2800 K and NbC melts congruently at 3886 K.
Phase transition3886 K3886congruent transformationexperimental[1] Huang 1990p. 2
report
Nb2C decomposes close to 2800 K and NbC melts congruently at 3886 K.

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (16)

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy, C–Nb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy
printed: °S298
21.36 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15Nb2C
alloy: Nb 0.666667
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 7
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
21.65 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15Nb2C
alloy: Nb 0.666667
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 8
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
20.44 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.702
alloy: Nb 0.587544
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 6
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
18.75 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.702
alloy: Nb 0.587544
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 5
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
19.83 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.825
alloy: Nb 0.547945
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 4
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
18.04 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.825
alloy: Nb 0.547945
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 3
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
17.52 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.98
alloy: Nb 0.505051
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 1
report
Entropy
printed: °S298
17.45 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.98
alloy: Nb 0.505051
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 2
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
21.17 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15Nb2C
alloy: Nb 0.666667
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 7
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
20.93 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15Nb2C
alloy: Nb 0.666667
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 8
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
19.87 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.702
alloy: Nb 0.587544
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 6
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
19.59 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.702
alloy: Nb 0.587544
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 5
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
19.34 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.825
alloy: Nb 0.547945
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 4
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
19.28 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.825
alloy: Nb 0.547945
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 3
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
18.57 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.98
alloy: Nb 0.505051
experimental[1] Huang 1990
cites SANDENAW 1965
Table 3, p. 8, row 1
report
Heat capacity
printed: °Cp,298
18.77 J/mol (basis unstated)/K298.15NbC0.98
alloy: Nb 0.505051
model[1] Huang 1990Table 3, p. 8, row 2
report

Crystal structure (10)

Crystal structure, C–Nb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a
printed: a
5.08 Å0Nb3C
alloy: Nb 0.75
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Lattice a
printed: a
12.66 Å0Nb5C2
alloy: Nb 0.714286
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice a
printed: a
4.53 Å0Nb7C3
alloy: Nb 0.7
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report
Lattice b
printed: b
7.66 Å0Nb3C
alloy: Nb 0.75
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Lattice b
printed: b
5.45 Å0Nb5C2
alloy: Nb 0.714286
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice b
printed: b
7.92 Å0Nb7C3
alloy: Nb 0.7
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report
Lattice c
printed: c
6.31 Å0Nb3C
alloy: Nb 0.75
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 1
report
Lattice c
printed: c
5.87 Å0Nb5C2
alloy: Nb 0.714286
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report
Lattice c
printed: c
15.97 Å0Nb7C3
alloy: Nb 0.7
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 3
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: β
97.23 unknown0Nb5C2
alloy: Nb 0.714286
DFT[2] Khvan 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 2
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Weiming Huang, Thermodynamic evaluation of Nb–C system, Materials Science and Technology 6, 687-694 (1990). doi:10.1179/mst.1990.6.8.687
  2. A.V. Khvan, B. Hallstedt, K. Chang, Thermodynamic assessment of Cr–Nb–C and Mn–Nb–C systems, Calphad 39, 54-61 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.09.002