C–Ni–Si system

38 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 23, model 15); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 83 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	23
model	15

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	38

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the C–Ni–Si system (38)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1555.15	L -> θ + C	L: Ni 0.655, Si 0.32; θ: Ni 0.677, Si 0.333; C: Ni 0, Si 0	experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 34 report
1553.15	L + C -> θ + SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 1 report
1545.15	eutectic: L -> θ + C	L: Ni 0.6606, Si 0.3303; θ: Ni 0.6632, Si 0.3308; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 35 report
1543.15	L -> γ + C	L: Ni 0.71, Si 0.28; γ: Ni 0.714, Si 0.286; C: Ni 0, Si 0	experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 36 report
1533.15	L + C -> θ + SiC	L: Ni 0.6354, Si 0.3565; C: Ni 0, Si 0; θ: Ni 0.6615, Si 0.3385; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 3 report
1524.15	L + θ -> δ + C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 4 report
1522.15	L -> γ + C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 37 report
1519.15	L + θ -> δ + C	L: Ni 0.6886, Si 0.3024; θ: Ni 0.6645, Si 0.3355; δ: Ni 0.6667, Si 0.3333; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 5 report
1512.15	L + C -> θ + SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 2 report
1506.15	eutectic: L -> γ + C	L: Ni 0.7075, Si 0.283; γ: Ni 0.7143, Si 0.2857; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 38 report
1505.15	L -> γ + δ + C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 6 report
1504.15	L -> γ + δ + C	L: Ni 0.6976, Si 0.2935; γ: Ni 0.7143, Si 0.2857; δ: Ni 0.6667, Si 0.3333; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 7 report
1458.15	L + δ -> β3 + C	L: Ni 0.7515, Si 0.2378; δ: Ni 0.7143, Si 0.2857; β3: Ni 0.75, Si 0.25; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 10 report
1444.15	L + δ -> β3 + C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 9 report
1436.15	C + θ -> δ + SiC	C: Ni 0, Si 0; θ: Ni 0.6625, Si 0.3375; δ: Ni 0.6667, Si 0.3333; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 12 report
1433.15	L + δ -> β3 + C	L: Ni 0.765, Si 0.21; δ: Ni 0.714, Si 0.286; β3: Ni 0.75, Si 0.25; C: Ni 0, Si 0	experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 8 report
1428.15	C + θ -> δ + SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 11 report
1419.15	L -> (Ni) + C + β3		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 14 report
1418.15	L -> (Ni) + C + β3	L: Ni 0.78, Si 0.19; (Ni): Ni 0.822, Si 0.175; C: Ni 0, Si 0; β3: Ni 0.75, Si 0.25	experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 13 report
1410.15	L -> (Ni) + C + β3	L: Ni 0.7812, Si 0.2069; (Ni): Ni 0.8302, Si 0.1685; C: Ni 0, Si 0; β3: Ni 0.75, Si 0.25	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 15 report
1400.15	β3 -> β2, γ, C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 16 report
1314.15	(Ni) + β2 -> β1 + C	(Ni): Ni 0.831, Si 0.168; β2: Ni 0.75, Si 0.25; β1: Ni 0.7706, Si 0.2294; C: Ni 0, Si 0	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 19 report
1310.15	(Ni) + β2 -> β1 + C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 18 report
1288.15	β2 -> β1 + γ, C		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 20 report
1266.15	L + (Si) -> NiSi2 + SiC	L: Ni 0.395, Si 0.6; (Si): Ni 0, Si 0.99; NiSi2: Ni 0.333, Si 0.667; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 22 report
1265.15	L -> NiSi + SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 7, row 1 report
1260.15	L -> NiSi + SiC	L: Si 0.4999; NiSi: Si 0.5; SiC: Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 7, row 2 report
1243.15	L + (Si) -> NiSi2 + SiC	L: Ni 0.4003, Si 0.5996; (Si): Ni 0, Si 1; NiSi2: Ni 0.3333, Si 0.6667; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 24 report
1241.15	L + (Si) -> NiSi2 + SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 23 report
1239.15	L -> θ + NiSi, SiC	L: Ni 0.5408, Si 0.4591; θ: Ni 0.622, Si 0.378; NiSi: Ni 0.5, Si 0.5; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 27 report
1239.15	L -> NiSi + NiSi2, SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 28 report
1237.15	L -> θ + NiSi, SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999 cites Brukl 1969	Table V, p. 6, row 25 report
1229.15	L -> θ + NiSi, SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 26 report
1226.15	L -> NiSi + NiSi2, SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 29 report
1221.15	L -> NiSi + NiSi2, SiC	L: Ni 0.434, Si 0.5659; NiSi: Ni 0.5, Si 0.5; NiSi2: Ni 0.3333, Si 0.6667; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 30 report
1134.15	θ + NiSi -> ε, SiC		experimental	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 31 report
1131.15	θ + NiSi -> ε, SiC	θ: Ni 0.6351, Si 0.3649; NiSi: Ni 0.5, Si 0.5; ε: Ni 0.6, Si 0.4; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 32 report
1097.15	θ -> δ + ε, SiC	θ: Ni 0.6457, Si 0.3543; δ: Ni 0.6667, Si 0.3333; ε: Ni 0.6, Si 0.4; SiC: Ni 0, Si 0.5	model	[1] Du 1999	Table V, p. 6, row 33 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Yong Du, Julius C. Schuster, Experimental investigations and thermodynamic descriptions of the Ni-Si and C-Ni-Si systems, Metall Mater Trans A 30, 2409-2418 (1999). doi:10.1007/s11661-999-0249-8

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}