C–Pr system
12 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 9, model 3); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 9 |
| model | 3 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 6 |
| formation | 3 |
| crystal structure | 3 |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1424.55 | βPrC2 + (C) <-> αPrC2 | βPrC2: C 0.666; (C): C 1; αPrC2: C 0.6667 | model | [1] Peng 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 35 report | |
| 1424.55 | βPrC2 <-> Pr2C3 + αPrC2 | βPrC2: C 0.666; Pr2C3: C 0.598; αPrC2: C 0.667 | model | [1] Peng 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 33 report | |
| 1418.15 | βPrC2 <-> Pr2C3 + αPrC2 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Conclusions | Table 4, p. 6, row 34 report | ||
| 1407.15 | βPrC2 + (C) <-> αPrC2 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Conclusions | Table 4, p. 6, row 36 report | ||
| 949.05 | (βPr) <-> Pr2C3 + (αPr) | (βPr): C 0.065; Pr2C3: C 0.548; (αPr): C 0.044 | model | [1] Peng 2011 | Table 4, p. 6, row 29 report | |
| 948.15 | (βPr) <-> Pr2C3 + (αPr) | (βPr): C 0.062 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Conclusions | Table 4, p. 6, row 30 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pr2C3 | Pr2C3 | -27.9 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | experimental | -13.558 (mp-aaaaabah) | -14.229 (oqmd-2191) | [1] Peng 2011 cites Anderson 1970 | Table 2, p. 2, row 17 report | |
| PrC2 | PrC2 | -29.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.6 | 298.15 | experimental | -9.857 (mp-aaaaacyt) | -10.23 (oqmd-3666) | [1] Peng 2011 cites Meschel 1995 doi | Table 2, p. 2, row 19 report | |
| PrC2 | PrC2 | -28.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.5 | 298.15 | experimental | -9.857 (mp-aaaaacyt) | -10.23 (oqmd-3666) | [1] Peng 2011 cites Anderson 2011 | Table 2, p. 2, row 18 report |
Other properties
Crystal structure (3)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 8.59 Å | 298.15 | Pr2C3 alloy: Pr 0.4 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Atoji 1978 doi | Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.85 Å | 298.15 | α PrC2 alloy: Pr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Atoji 1967 | Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report | |
| Lattice c | 6.42 Å | 298.15 | α PrC2 alloy: Pr 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Peng 2011 cites Atoji 1967 | Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Yingbiao Peng, Yong Du, Lijun Zhang, Chunsheng Sha, Shuhong Liu, Feng Zheng et al., Thermodynamic modeling of the C–RE (RE=La, Ce and Pr) systems, Calphad 35, 533-541 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.002