Ca–Ce–Mg system
56 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 34, model 22); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 17 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 34 |
| model | 22 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 24 |
| phase transition | 24 |
| phase equilibrium | 8 |
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1048.15 | quasi-peritectic: L'' + βCa = L' + βCe | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| 945.15 | other: L' = CaMg2 + CeMg3 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| 943.15 | other: L' + L'' = CeMg | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report | ||
| 926.15 | eutectic: L'' = βCe + CeMg + L' | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report | ||
| 920.63 | Mg2Ce + liquid 2 -> Mg3Ce + liquid 1 | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.2687, Mg 0.692 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 2 report | |
| 918.56 | MgCe + liquid 1 -> Mg2Ce + liquid 2 | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.3271, Mg 0.5744 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 1 report | |
| 888.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + CeMg2 = CeMg + CeMg3 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report | ||
| 885.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + βCe = CeMg + βCa | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report | ||
| 884.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + Ce2Mg17 = Ce5Mg41 + CeMg12 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 7 report | ||
| 877.21 | Mg17Ce2 + liquid 1 -> Mg41Ce5 + Mg12Ce | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.1019, Mg 0.898 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 6 report | |
| 868.81 | Mg3Ce + liquid 1 -> Mg2Ca + Mg41Ce5 | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.1122, Mg 0.8675 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 3 report | |
| 866.62 | Liquid 1 + liquid 2 + bcc(Ce) -> MgCe | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.3514, Mg 0.2882 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 7 report | |
| 864.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + CeMg3 = CaMg2 + Ce5Mg41 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 9 report | ||
| 855.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + CeMg3 = CaMg2 + Ce5Mg41 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| 820.29 | Mg41Ce5 + liquid 1 -> Mg12Ce + Mg2Ca | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.0954, Mg 0.8871 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 4 report | |
| 815.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + Ce5Mg41 = CaMg2 + CeMg12 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 10 report | ||
| 813.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + Ce5Mg41 = CaMg2 + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 11 report | ||
| 805.15 | quasi-peritectic: L + CeMg3 = CeMg + CaMg2 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 12 report | ||
| 790.3 | Liquid 1 -> Mg2Ca + Mg12Ce + hcp(Mg) | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.0557, Mg 0.883 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 5 report | |
| 787.15 | eutectic: L = CeMg12 + CaMg2 + (Mg) | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 13 report | ||
| 786.15 | eutectic: L = CeMg12 + CaMg2 + (Mg) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 14 report | ||
| 766.21 | Liquid 1 + liquid 2 -> bcc(Ca) + Mg3Ce | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.2367, Mg 0.5139 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 9 report | |
| 720.22 | Mg3Ce + liquid 2 -> bcc(Ca) + Mg2Ca | unspecified (invariant point): Ce 0.1113, Mg 0.5855 | model | [2] Zhang 2008 | Table 7, p. 7, row 8 report | |
| 718.15 | eutectic: L = βCa + CaMg2 + CeMg | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 15 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (24)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 732.15 K | 732.15 | polymorphic: βCa = αCa ((+αCe)) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| Phase transition | 785.15 K | 785.15 | eutectic: E2 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Phase transition | 786.15 K | 786.15 | eutectic: E2 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| Phase transition | 787.15 K | 787.15 | eutectic: E2 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Phase transition | 815.15 K | 815.15 | other: L + Ce5Mg41 = CaMg2 + CeMg12 | model | [1] Hampl 2007 | p. 7 report | not differ until the tertiary step, where the reaction U6 at 542 °C is encountered. Under equilibrium conditions the entire amount of Ce5Mg41 (60%) should be completely consumed for this alloy in the transition-type reaction U6, L + Ce5Mg41 = CaMg2 + CeMg12. |
| Phase transition | 823.15 K | 823.15 | L + CeMg12/L + CeMg12 + (Mg) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Phase transition | 825.15 K | 825.15 | L + (Mg)/L + (Mg) + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| Phase transition | 828.15 K | 828.15 | L + (Mg)/L + (Mg) + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Phase transition | 834.15 K | 834.15 | other: L/L + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Phase transition | 839.15 K | 839.15 | L + CeMg12/L + CeMg12 + (Mg) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report | |
| Phase transition | 842.15 K | 842.15 | L + CeMg12/L + CeMg12 + (Mg) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Phase transition | 859.15 K | 859.15 | L/L + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| Phase transition | 860.15 K | 860.15 | other: L/L + CeMg12 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Phase transition | 865.15 K | 865.15 | L/L + Ce5Mg41 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| Phase transition | 880.15 K | 880.15 | other: L/L + Ce5Mg41 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report | |
| Phase transition | 884.15 K | 884.15 | other: L/L + (Mg) | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Phase transition | 913.15 K | 913.15 | other: L/L + CeMg3 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| Phase transition | 988.15 K | 988.15 | polymorphic: βCe = αCe + βCa | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report | |
| Phase transition | 1010.15 K | 1010.15 | other: L/L + CaMg2 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| Phase transition | 1013.15 K | 1013.15 | L/L + CaMg2 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 37 report | |
| Phase transition | 1042.15 K | 1042.15 | other: L/L + CeMg3? | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| Phase transition | 1078.15 K | 1078.15 | L″ + βCa = βCe | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| Phase transition | 1121.15 K | 1121.15 | L′ + L″ = βCa | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| Phase transition | 1122.15 K | 1122.15 | L′ + L″ = βCa | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 2, p. 4, row 42 report |
Phase equilibrium (8)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase assemblage | (Ca) + (Ce) alloy: Ca 0.5, Ce 0.5, Mg 0 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | (Mg) + CeMg12 alloy: Ca 0.023, Ce 0.01, Mg 0.967 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | CaMg2 + CeMg12 alloy: Ca 0.25, Ce 0.04, Mg 0.71 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | Ce5Mg41 + CaMg2 + (Mg) alloy: Ca 0.057, Ce 0.063, Mg 0.88 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | CeMg12 + (Mg) alloy: Ca 0.03, Ce 0.04, Mg 0.93 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | CeMg12 + (Mg) alloy: Ca 0.04, Ce 0.03, Mg 0.93 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | CeMg3 + Ce5Mg41 + CaMg2 alloy: Ca 0.082, Ce 0.082, Mg 0.836 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |||
| Phase assemblage | CeMg3 + CeMg alloy: Ca 0.15, Ce 0.22, Mg 0.63 | experimental | [1] Hampl 2007 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Milan Hampl, Joachim Gröbner, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Experimental study of phase equilibria and solidification microstructures of Mg–Ca–Ce alloys combined with thermodynamic modeling, J Mater Sci 42, 10023-10031 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2002-2
- Hui Zhang, Yi Wang, Shunli Shang, Long-Qing Chen, Zi-Kui Liu, Thermodynamic modeling of Mg–Ca–Ce system by combining first-principles and CALPHAD method, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 463, 294-301 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.020