Ca–H–Li system
14 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 7); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 7 |
| model | 7 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 14 |
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1163.65 | L + βCaH2 = (βCa) | L: H 0.292; βCaH2: H 0.667; (βCa): H 0.343 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| 1163.15 | L + βCaH2 = (βCa) | L: H 0.3; βCaH2: H 0.667 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Peterson 1961 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| 1053.25 | βCaH2 = αCaH2 | βCaH2: H 0.667; αCaH2: H 0.667; L: H 0.257 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| 1053.15 | βCaH2 = αCaH2 | βCaH2: H 0.667; αCaH2: H 0.667; L: H 0.294 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Peterson 1961 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| 962.15 | L2 -> L1 + LiH | L2: H 0.496; L1: H 0.19; LiH: H 0.5 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Sangster 1993 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| 961.55 | L2 -> L1 + LiH | L2: H 0.492; L1: H 0.18; LiH: H 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| 873.15 | (βCa) + αCaH2 = γ | αCaH2: H 0.667; γ: H 0.161 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Peterson 1961 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| 872.05 | (βCa) + αCaH2 = γ | (βCa): H 0.117; αCaH2: H 0.667; γ: H 0.146 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| 720.45 | (βCa) + γ = (αCa) | (βCa): H 0.0085; γ: H 0.013; (αCa): H 0.0095 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 14 report | |
| 716.15 | (βCa) + γ = (αCa) | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Peterson 1961 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report | ||
| 633.15 | γ = (αCa) + αCaH2 | γ: H 0.033; αCaH2: H 0.667 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Peterson 1961 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report | |
| 630.35 | γ = (αCa) + αCaH2 | γ: H 0.035; (αCa): H 0.018 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 16 report | |
| 453.65 | L -> (Li) + LiH | L: H 3.000e-4; (Li): H 1.000e-4; LiH: H 0.5 | experimental | [1] Wang 2012 cites Sangster 1993 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| 453.45 | L -> (Li) + LiH | L: H 2.000e-4; (Li): H 0; LiH: H 0.5 | model | [1] Wang 2012 | Table 3, p. 3, row 2 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Man Wang, Weihua Sun, Chunsheng Sha, Biao Hu, Yong Du, Lixian Sun et al., Thermodynamic Modeling of the Li-H and Ca-H Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 33, 89-96 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11669-012-9997-z