Ca–O system

61 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 11, model 44, DFT 6); 4 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental11
model44
DFT6
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction2
phase transition1
phase equilibrium18
formation14
heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy26

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CaO-18Lia.tdbS.-M. Liang, R. Schmid-Fetzer, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 38, 4768-85(2018). doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.01578618178a1324682abe5762bf34fd20689dfc6461c02571d1f63465f606dfcc1viewer · TDB · JSON
CaO-20Def-3g.tdbG. Deffrennes, N. Jakse, C.M.S. Alvares, I. Nuta, A. Pasturel, A.V. Khvan, A. Pisch, Calphad, 69, 101764(2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.1017642df29e5f285a88c61920a1de0346ed6dd875de0fc237350301d09f81ab4df153viewer · TDB · JSON
CaO-23Abd-3g.tdbW. Abdul, C. Mawalala, A. Pisch, M.N. Bannerman, Cem. Concr. Res., 173, 107309(2023). doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107309c6509b3e8c06ae7f3214e95a3bdd245dabd062bed11d4cb6bbf45398f8017220viewer · TDB · JSON
CaO-96Sel.tdbM. Selleby, B. Sundman, Calphad, 20, 391-92(1996). doi:10.1016/S0364-5916(96)00039-9c26a22ca6d938a23c4deba75b8dd32e0968fb65a59ed515eb6d0dc508a66bcb7viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CaO-23Abd-3g.tdb716.03BCC_A2 (x(O) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(O) 0) + B1_OXIDE (x(O) 0.5)
CaO-96Sel.tdb1111.39BCC_A2 (x(O) 0) + ION (x(O) 0.00299) + B1_OXIDE (x(O) 0.5)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CaO-20Def-3g

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ca–O system (2)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1103.2eutectic: L -> β-Ca + CaOL: O 0.0098model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 4, p. 21, row 2
report
1094.6eutectic: L -> β-Ca + CaOL: O 0.017model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 4, p. 21, row 1
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ca–O system (14)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
CaO(cr)CaO-317.55 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-318.981 (mp-aaaaadwf)-308.324 (oqmd-1443085)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 6
report
CaO(cr)CaO-317.55 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-318.981 (mp-aaaaadwf)-308.324 (oqmd-1443085)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 3
report
CaO(cr)CaO-317.3 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-318.981 (mp-aaaaadwf)-308.324 (oqmd-1443085)[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 1
report
CaO(cr)-317.3 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 5
report
CaO(cr)CaO-317 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-318.981 (mp-aaaaadwf)-308.324 (oqmd-1443085)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 2
report
CaO(cr)CaO-317 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.75298.15model-318.981 (mp-aaaaadwf)-308.324 (oqmd-1443085)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 4
report
CaO(liq-am)-300.45 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 7
report
CaO(liq-am)-282.8 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 8
report
CaO(liq-am)-278.65 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 10
report
CaO(liq-am)-277.8 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 9
report
CaO2(cr)CaO2-219.667 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-212.9 (mp-aaabkddr)-219.972 (oqmd-1367693)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 13
report
CaO2(cr)CaO2-217.567 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-212.9 (mp-aaabkddr)-219.972 (oqmd-1367693)[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 12
report
CaO2(cr)-216.033 kJ/mol-atom298.15DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 14
report
CaO2(cr)CaO2-216.033 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-212.9 (mp-aaabkddr)-219.972 (oqmd-1367693)[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 11
report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, Ca–O system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition3221.8 K3221.8congruent transformationmodel[2] Liang 2018p. 14
report
However, in the binary Ca-O system the congruent melting point of CaO occurs at 3221.8 K.

Phase equilibrium (18)

Phase equilibrium, Ca–O system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition2843congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Kanolt 1913
Table 2, p. 5, row 1
report
Phase composition2845congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites Factsage 2017
Table 2, p. 5, row 16
report
Phase composition2849congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Schumacher 1926 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 2
report
Phase composition2863congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Noguchi 1967 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 6
report
Phase composition2886congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites Hlavac 1982 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 12
report
Phase composition2886congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites Wriedt 1985 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 13
report
Phase composition2890congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Panek 1979
Table 2, p. 5, row 9
report
Phase composition2893congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites OlShanskil 1958
Table 2, p. 5, row 3
report
Phase composition2898congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Doman 1963
Table 2, p. 5, row 4
report
Phase composition2900congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites Kubaschewski 1993
Table 2, p. 5, row 14
report
Phase composition3172congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Yamada 1986 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase composition3172congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites SGTE 2013
Table 2, p. 5, row 17
report
Phase composition3173congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Traverse 1969
Table 2, p. 5, row 8
report
Phase composition3183congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Foex 1965 doi
Table 2, p. 5, row 5
report
Phase composition3200congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018
cites Chase 1998
Table 2, p. 5, row 15
report
Phase composition3222congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
model[2] Liang 2018Table 2, p. 5, row 18
report
Phase composition3222congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Manara 2014
Table 2, p. 5, row 11
report
Phase composition3223congruent melting: CaO
liquid: O 0.5; CaO: O 0.5
experimental[2] Liang 2018
cites Foex 1968
Table 2, p. 5, row 7
report

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (26)

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy, Ca–O system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy
printed: S°
19.105 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 6
report
Entropy
printed: S°
19.05 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 2
report
Entropy
printed: S°
20.175 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 1
report
Entropy
printed: S°
20.175 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 5
report
Entropy
printed: S°
18.875 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 3
report
Entropy
printed: S°
31.16 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 10
report
Entropy
printed: S°
29.345 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 8
report
Entropy
printed: S°
20.175 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 7
report
Entropy
printed: S°
32.845 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 9
report
Entropy
printed: S°
27.8933 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 13
report
Entropy
printed: S°
19.8667 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 14
report
Entropy
printed: S°
19.8667 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 11
report
Entropy
printed: S°
27.8933 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 12
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.06 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 6
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.025 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 2
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.365 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 1
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.365 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 5
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.01 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(cr)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 3
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.06 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Chase 1998
Table 3, p. 17, row 10
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.02 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 8
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.365 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 7
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
21.01 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO(liq-am)
alloy: O 0.5
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 9
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
27.6133 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Lindberg 2009 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 13
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
20.5267 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
DFT[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Pisch
Table 3, p. 17, row 14
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
20.5433 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020Table 3, p. 17, row 11
report
Heat capacity
printed: Cp°
27.6133 J/mol-atom/K298.15CaO2(cr)
alloy: O 0.666667
model[1] Deffrennes 2020
cites Liang 2018 doi
Table 3, p. 17, row 12
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Guillaume Deffrennes, Noël Jakse, Cecilia M.S. Alvares, Ioana Nuta, Alain Pasturel, Alexandra Khvan et al., Thermodynamic modelling of the Ca–O system including 3rd generation description of CaO and CaO2, Calphad 69, 101764 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101764
  2. Song-Mao Liang, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Complete thermodynamic description of the Mg-Ca-O phase diagram including the Ca-O, Mg-O and CaO-MgO subsystems, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 38, 4768-4785 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.015