Cd–Gd system

94 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 43, model 43, unspecified 8); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental43
model43
unspecified8
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction74
phase transition1
formation15
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy4

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CdGd-01Kur.tdbM. Kurata, Y. Sakamura, J. Phase Equilib., 22, 232-40(2001). doi:10.1361/10549710177033870797df537966dc77f972081f2fdd64243431c85f7e98187037b39185366e9d7e21viewer · TDB · JSON
CdGd-19Liu.tdbJ. Liu, F. Li, C. Guo, Q. Li, J. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Xiao, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 40, 732-42(2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00759-3356df5888b105f3a47db80a9d88f72b2e625e4db64b9f5da3813c9b751b6b341viewer · TDB · JSON
CdGd-24Azz.tdbH. Azza, M. Ait Boukideur, K. Achgar, M. Idbenali, N. Selhaoui, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 45, 714-22(2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01127-64917656bbc153c995a56b1e3266d95eeda49b6d1c0d0b0b1887916bcb1231b8bviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1508.16LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.96749) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1508.16LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.96745) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1508.16LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.96737) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1508.16LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.96749) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1277.97LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.31807) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1277.97LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.31801) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1277.97LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.3181) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1088.15LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.18356) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1088.15LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.18351) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1088.15LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.18365) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25) + CD2GD (x(Gd) 0.33333)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1076.27LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.1744) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1076.27LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.17433) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1076.27LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.17444) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1074.21LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.16976) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1074.21LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.16971) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb1074.21LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.16971) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19643)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb996.01LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.09439) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb996LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.09452) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb996LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.0946) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb922.3CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.79849) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb922.3CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.79853) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb922.3CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.79847) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb593.53HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.0014) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286)
CdGd-01Kur.tdb593.53HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.0014) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1356.62LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.33084) + CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.3369) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.4987)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1315.08CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.52193) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.73372) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 0.77227)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1262.73LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.24219) + CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.32377) + CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.33304)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1258.47CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.33267) + CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.33411) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.49831)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1105.25LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.14575) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25) + CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.2951)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1099.13LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.14179) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19287) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1099.13LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.14193) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19291) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1007.42LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.0743) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.17484)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb1007.42LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.07435) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.17486)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb938.53CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.52272) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 0.89713) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0.98213)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb733.35LIQUID (x(Gd) 8.400e-4) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb733.35LIQUID (x(Gd) 8.500e-4) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb733.35LIQUID (x(Gd) 8.400e-4) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb600.49CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19639)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb600.49CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19639)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb600.49CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14286) + CD58GD13 (x(Gd) 0.1831) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.19639)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb594.22LIQUID (x(Gd) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111)
CdGd-19Liu.tdb594.22HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1569.02HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 1) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 1)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1267.17LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.34033) + CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.35826) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.48775)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1213.52CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.35436) + CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.35437) + CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.4873)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1202.1LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.26485) + CD2GD_HT (x(Gd) 0.33861) + CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.33861)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1166.09CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.5068) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.73105) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 0.77721)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1103.69LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.2122) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25) + CD2GD_C32 (x(Gd) 0.33409)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1077.6CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.18809) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.18936) + CD3GD_D019 (x(Gd) 0.25)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1018.02CDGD_B2 (x(Gd) 0.51141) + BCC_A2 (x(Gd) 0.84462) + HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0.91472)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb1002.81LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.11027) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.15379) + CD45GD11 (x(Gd) 0.17332)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb727.92LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.02105) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14002)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb727.92LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.02105) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14002)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb727.92LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.02105) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111) + CD6GD (x(Gd) 0.14002)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb592.12HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.0038) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb592.12HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.00376) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111)
CdGd-24Azz.tdb592.12HCP_A3 (x(Gd) 0) + LIQUID (x(Gd) 0.00374) + CD8GD (x(Gd) 0.11111)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CdGd-01Kur · CALPHAD hull CdGd-19Liu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cd–Gd system (74)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1443.15congruent melting: CdGd -> LCdGd: Cd 0.5experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 7
report
1443congruent melting: liq. -> CdGdliq.: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 45
report
1443congruent melting: liq. -> CdGdliq.: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 46
report
1425congruent melting: liq. -> CdGdliq.: Gd 0.5035; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 43
report
1423.15congruent melting: CdGd -> LCdGd: Cd 0.5model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 9
report
1420.15congruent melting: CdGd -> LCdGd: Cd 0.5experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 8
report
1420congruent melting: liq. -> CdGdliq.: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 44
report
1420congruent melting: liq. -> CdGdliq.: Gd 0.503; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 42
report
1283.15peritectic: L + CdGd -> β- Cd2GdL: Cd 0.672; CdGd: Cd 0.5; β- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.667experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 14
report
1283liq. + CdGd -> β-Cd2GdCdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5; β-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 5
report
1283liq. + CdGd -> β-Cd2GdCdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5; β-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 4
report
1271.15peritectic: L + CdGd -> β- Cd2GdL: Cd 0.683; CdGd: Cd 0.512; β- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.661experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 15
report
1271liq. + CdGd -> β-Cd2Gdliq.: Gd 0.2949; CdGd: Gd 0.5815; β-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.3343model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 1
report
1271liq. + CdGd -> β-Cd2Gdliq.: Gd 0.317; CdGd: Gd 0.488; β-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.339experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 3
report
1270liq. + CdGd -> β-Cd2Gdliq.: Gd 0.3139; CdGd: Gd 0.4764; β-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.335model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 2
report
1269polymorphic: β-Cd2Gd -> α-Cd2Gdβ-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; α-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 9
report
1268.15polymorphic: α- Cd2Gd -> β- Cd2Gdα- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; β- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 10
report
1268polymorphic: β-Cd2Gd -> α-Cd2Gdβ-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; α-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 10
report
1267.95peritectic: L + CdGd -> β- Cd2GdL: Cd 0.659; CdGd: Cd 0.512; β- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.642model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 16
report
1262.25peritectoid: β- Cd2Gd + CdGd -> α- Cd2Gdβ- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.642; CdGd: Cd 0.513; α- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.642model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 12
report
1259.15polymorphic: α- Cd2Gd -> β- Cd2Gdα- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; β- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 11
report
1259polymorphic: β-Cd2Gd -> α-Cd2Gdβ-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; α-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 6
report
1259polymorphic: β-Cd2Gd -> α-Cd2Gdβ-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; α-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 8
report
1257.25metatectic/catatectic: β- Cd2Gd -> L + α- Cd2Gdβ- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.645; L: Cd 0.681; α- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.649model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 13
report
1210.15eutectic: L -> CdGd + (βGd)L: Cd 0.27; CdGd: Cd 0.5; (βGd): Cd 0.22experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 4
report
1210eutectic: liq. -> CdGd + bccliq.: Gd 0.8354; CdGd: Gd 0.5281; bcc: Gd 0.8858model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 11
report
1210eutectic: liq. -> CdGd + bccliq.: Gd 0.73; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 15
report
1193eutectic: liq. -> CdGd + bccCdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 14
report
1168.15eutectic: L -> CdGd + (βGd)L: Cd 0.265; CdGd: Cd 0.49; (βGd): Cd 0.226experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 5
report
1168eutectic: liq. -> CdGd + bccliq.: Gd 0.7631; CdGd: Gd 0.47; bcc: Gd 0.8329model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 12
report
1168eutectic: liq. -> CdGd + bccliq.: Gd 0.735; CdGd: Gd 0.51; bcc: Gd 0.774experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 13
report
1166.05eutectic: L -> CdGd + (βGd)L: Cd 0.269; CdGd: Cd 0.493; (βGd): Cd 0.223model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 6
report
1102.95peritectic: L + α- Cd2Gd -> Cd3GdL: Cd 0.789; α- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 19
report
1092.15peritectic: L + α- Cd2Gd -> Cd3GdL: Cd 0.79; α- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.671; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 18
report
1092liq. + α-Cd2Gd -> Cd3Gdliq.: Gd 0.21; α-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.329; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 23
report
1092liq. + α-Cd2Gd -> Cd3Gdliq.: Gd 0.1571; α-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.2992; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 22
report
1092liq. + α-Cd2Gd -> Cd3Gdliq.: Gd 0.1549; α-Cd2Gd: Gd 0.2984; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 21
report
1088.15peritectic: L + α- Cd2Gd -> Cd3GdL: Cd 0.79; α- Cd2Gd: Cd 0.667; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 17
report
1088liq. + α-Cd2Gd -> Cd3Gdα-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75, Gd 0.25experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 24
report
1088liq. + α-Cd2Gd -> Cd3Gdα-Cd2Gd: Cd 0.666667, Gd 0.333333; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75, Gd 0.25unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 25
report
1081.15peritectic: L + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11L: Cd 0.815; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.802experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 21
report
1081liq. + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11liq.: Gd 0.149; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.1933model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 27
report
1081liq. + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11liq.: Gd 0.1476; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.1933model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 26
report
1081liq. + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11liq.: Gd 0.185; Cd3Gd: Gd 0.25; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.198experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 28
report
1079.15peritectic: L + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11L: Cd 0.816; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.804experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 20
report
1079liq. + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75, Gd 0.25; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.803571, Gd 0.196429unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 29
report
1076.15peritectic: L + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd58Gd13L: Cd 0.824; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.804; Cd58Gd13: Cd 0.817experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 23
report
1055.75peritectic: L + Cd3Gd -> Cd45Gd11L: Cd 0.824; Cd3Gd: Cd 0.75; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.81model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 22
report
1035bcc -> CdGd + hcpbcc: Gd 0.8977; CdGd: Gd 0.5271; hcp: Gd 0.9695model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 16
report
1018.15eutectoid: (βGd) -> CdGd + (αGd)(βGd): Cd 0.191; CdGd: Cd 0.496; (αGd): Cd 0.046experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 2
report
1018bcc -> CdGd + hcpbcc: Gd 0.809; CdGd: Gd 0.504; hcp: Gd 0.954experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 18
report
1017.95eutectoid: (βGd) -> CdGd + (αGd)(βGd): Cd 0.155; CdGd: Cd 0.489; (αGd): Cd 0.085model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 3
report
1010bcc -> CdGd + hcpbcc: Gd 0.8607; CdGd: Gd 0.5281; hcp: Gd 0.9489model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 17
report
1003.15peritectic: L + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd6GdL: Cd 0.882; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.817; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.857experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 25
report
1003liq. + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd6Gdliq.: Gd 0.118; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.183; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.143experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 32
report
1003liq. + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd6Gdliq.: Gd 0.0832; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.1765; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.1429model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 31
report
1000liq. + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd6Gdliq.: Gd 0.0817; Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.1773; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.1429model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 30
report
998.15eutectoid: (βGd) -> CdGd + (αGd)(βGd): Cd 0.16; CdGd: Cd 0.5experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 1
report
998bcc -> CdGd + hcpbcc: Gd 0.84; CdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5unspecified[2] Liu 2019
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 20
report
998bcc -> CdGd + hcpCdGd: Cd 0.5, Gd 0.5experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Bruzzone 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 19
report
989.15peritectic: L + Cd58Gd13 -> Cd6GdL: Cd 0.886; Cd58Gd13: Cd 0.817; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.857experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 24
report
967.15peritectic: L + Cd45Gd11 -> Cd6GdL: Cd 0.895; Cd45Gd11: Cd 0.827; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.845model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 26
report
852.65peritectic: L + Cd6Gd -> Cd8GdL: Cd 0.944; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.856; Cd8Gd: Cd 0.889model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 29
report
738.15peritecticexperimental[1] Azza 2024p. 2
report
A new compound was reported a stoichiometry of ''GdCd8'', decomposing peritectically at 465 C.
738.15peritectic: L + Cd6Gd -> Cd8GdL: Cd 0.99; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.857; Cd8Gd: Cd 0.889experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 28
report
738liq. + Cd6Gd -> Cd8Gdliq.: Gd 0.01; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.143; Cd8Gd: Gd 0.113experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 35
report
738liq. + Cd6Gd -> Cd8Gdliq.: Gd 0.0015; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.1429; Cd8Gd: Gd 0.1111model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 34
report
738liq. + Cd6Gd -> Cd8Gdliq.: Gd 0.0047; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.1429; Cd8Gd: Gd 0.1111model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 33
report
600Cd45Gd11 + Cd6Gd -> Cd58Gd13Cd45Gd11: Gd 0.1964; Cd6Gd: Gd 0.1429; Cd58Gd13: Gd 0.1831model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 37
report
594eutectic: liq. -> hcp + Cd8Gdliq.: Gd 0; hcp: Gd 0; Cd8Gd: Gd 0.1111model[2] Liu 2019Table 2, p. 8, row 39
report
593.15eutectic: L -> (Cd) + Cd8GdL: Cd 0.998; (Cd): Cd 1; Cd8Gd: Cd 0.889experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 30
report
593eutectic: liq. -> hcp + Cd8Gdliq.: Gd 0.002; hcp: Gd 0; Cd8Gd: Gd 0.113experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
Table 2, p. 8, row 41
report
592.15eutectic: L -> (Cd) + Cd8GdL: Cd 0.996; (Cd): Cd 1; Cd8Gd: Cd 0.889model[1] Azza 2024Table 3, p. 7, row 31
report
589.15eutectic: L -> (Cd) + Cd6GdL: Cd 0.975; (Cd): Cd 1; Cd6Gd: Cd 0.857experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Gschneidner 1988 doi
Table 3, p. 7, row 27
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Cd–Gd system (15)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Cd3GdCd3Gd-37.17 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-27.075 (mp-aaaabgtm)-29.172 (oqmd-11027)[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 6
report
Cd3GdCd3Gd-36.07 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-27.075 (mp-aaaabgtm)-29.172 (oqmd-11027)[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 7
report
Cd45Gd11-33.1 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 8
report
Cd45Gd11-30.41 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 9
report
Cd58Gd13-31.92 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 10
report
Cd6Gd-28.2 kJ/mol-atom728experimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Roshchina 1981
Table 4, p. 7, row 11
report
Cd6Gd-26.78 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 13
report
Cd6Gd-24.73 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 14
report
Cd6Gd-22.9 kJ/mol-atom298.15unspecified[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 12
report
Cd8Gd-19.56 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 15
report
CdGdCdGd-60.83 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-33.296 (mp-aaaaabnr)-31.478 (oqmd-55278)[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 2
report
CdGdCdGd-55.65 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-33.296 (mp-aaaaabnr)-31.478 (oqmd-55278)[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 1
report
α-Cd2GdCd2Gd-43.89 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-31.052 (mp-aaaabfaj)-32.441 (oqmd-11026)[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 5
report
α-Cd2GdCd2Gd-42.96 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-31.052 (mp-aaaabfaj)-32.441 (oqmd-11026)[1] Azza 2024
cites Kurata 2001 doi
Table 4, p. 7, row 4
report
β-Cd2GdCd2Gd-43.88 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-31.052 (mp-aaaabfaj)-32.441 (oqmd-11026)[1] Azza 2024Table 4, p. 7, row 3
report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, Cd–Gd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1259.15 K1259.15polymorphicexperimental[1] Azza 2024
cites Reichmann 2014 doi
p. 2
report
These authors confirmed the existence of six intermediate phases: GdCd, GdCd2 (a polymorphic transformation a $ b at 986 C), GdCd3, Gd11Cd45, Gd13Cd58 and GdCd6 which were already described by Bruzzone et al.[4]

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (4)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Cd–Gd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs formation energy
-19.9 kJ g atom-1773experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Roshchina 1981
p. 3
report
With other information concerning a value for the Gd activity in the two-phase field Cd6Gd ? L[28] and the Gibbs-Duhem integration method, the Gibbs formation energies at the exact stoichiometric compositions of the phases Cd58Gd13, Cd45Gd11, Cd3Gd, and Cd2Gd obtained were approximately - 19.9, - 21.1, - 24.8, and - 30.0 kJ g atom-1 at 773 K, respectively.
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs formation energy
-21.1 kJ g atom-1773experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Roshchina 1981
p. 3
report
With other information concerning a value for the Gd activity in the two-phase field Cd6Gd ? L[28] and the Gibbs-Duhem integration method, the Gibbs formation energies at the exact stoichiometric compositions of the phases Cd58Gd13, Cd45Gd11, Cd3Gd, and Cd2Gd obtained were approximately - 19.9, - 21.1, - 24.8, and - 30.0 kJ g atom-1 at 773 K, respectively.
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs formation energy
-24.8 kJ g atom-1773experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Roshchina 1981
p. 3
report
With other information concerning a value for the Gd activity in the two-phase field Cd6Gd ? L[28] and the Gibbs-Duhem integration method, the Gibbs formation energies at the exact stoichiometric compositions of the phases Cd58Gd13, Cd45Gd11, Cd3Gd, and Cd2Gd obtained were approximately - 19.9, - 21.1, - 24.8, and - 30.0 kJ g atom-1 at 773 K, respectively.
Gibbs energy
printed: Gibbs formation energy
-30 kJ g atom-1773experimental[2] Liu 2019
cites Roshchina 1981
p. 3
report
With other information concerning a value for the Gd activity in the two-phase field Cd6Gd ? L[28] and the Gibbs-Duhem integration method, the Gibbs formation energies at the exact stoichiometric compositions of the phases Cd58Gd13, Cd45Gd11, Cd3Gd, and Cd2Gd obtained were approximately - 19.9, - 21.1, - 24.8, and - 30.0 kJ g atom-1 at 773 K, respectively.

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Hassan Azza, Mustapha Ait Boukideur, Khadija Achgar, Mohamed Idbenali, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic Description of the Gadolinium-Cadmium Phase Diagram, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 45, 714-722 (2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01127-6
  2. Jinming Liu, Fei Li, Chengjun Guo, Qugang Li, Jinping Liu, Xu Zhang et al., Investigation of the Thermodynamic Properties, Phase Relations, and Stability of the Cd–Gd System via Thermodynamic Remodeling, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 40, 732-742 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11669-019-00759-3