# Cd–Sb–Zn system > Cd–Sb–Zn system: 17 accepted literature values (invariant reaction 11, crystal structure 6) and 0 calculated phase diagram(s) from ORCHID, each value with evidence class, source, page and quote. HTML: https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/CD-SB-ZN.html · Markdown: https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/CD-SB-ZN.md 17 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (model 17); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). Data: [JSON](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/systems/CD-SB-ZN.json) · [CSV](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/CD-SB-ZN.csv) · [interactive explorer](https://orchid-project.org/data-explorer/#CD-SB-ZN) · [papers (bibliography)](https://data.orchid-project.org/bibliography/pages/systems/CD-SB-ZN.html) · [Markdown](https://data.orchid-project.org/systems/CD-SB-ZN.md) Table: Accepted values by evidence class | Evidence class | Values | |---|---:| | model | 17 | Table: Accepted values by property group | Property group | Values | |---|---:| | invariant reaction | 11 | | crystal structure | 6 | ## Invariant reactions (literature) Table: Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cd–Sb–Zn system (11) | T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote | |---:|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 803.44 | quasi-peritectic: L + δ'-Sb3Zn4 -> ω-SbZn + ξ-Sb2Zn3 | L: Sb 0.448, Zn 0.485; ω: Sb 0.503, Zn 0.492 | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 8, p. 11, row 1; `ORC-42QNGT6HY5` | | | 801.72 | peritectic: L + ω-SbZn + ξ-Sb2Zn3 -> ε-Sb3Zn4 | L: Sb 0.445, Zn 0.484; ω: Sb 0.503, Zn 0.491; ε: Sb 0.433, Zn 0.553 | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 8, p. 11, row 2; `ORC-VWIYPFWG7U` | | | 766.02 | quasi-peritectic: L + γ = β + η | L: Sb 0.38, Zn 0.487 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1; `ORC-I322WOPNWL` | | | 766.02 | quasi-peritectic: L + γ = β + ω | L: Sb 0.412, Zn 0.45; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.449 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2; `ORC-NRKBNQYMRJ` | | | 728.64 | quasi-peritectic: L + ξ-Sb2Zn3 -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + η-Sb2Zn3 | L: Sb 0.096, Zn 0.852; ε: Sb 0.43, Zn 0.554 | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 8, p. 11, row 3; `ORC-PHF5GVRTMM` | | | 719.86 | quasi-peritectic: L + η = β + ζ | L: Sb 0.288, Zn 0.545 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3; `ORC-UZQ7JDGYKU` | | | 676.47 | quasi-peritectic: L + ζ = β + (Zn) | L: Sb 0.021, Zn 0.961; (Zn): Sb 0.0013, Zn 0.997 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4; `ORC-P5SS5LR3FO` | | | 564.77 | eutectic: L -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + (Cd) + ω-SbZn | L: Sb 0.049, Zn 0.05; (Cd): Sb 0.003, Zn 0.011; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.265; ε: Sb 0.429, Zn 0.412 | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 8, p. 11, row 5; `ORC-RYOG7ZDQFE` | | | 551 | quasi-peritectic: L + β = ω + (Zn) | L: Sb 0.012, Zn 0.333; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.364; (Zn): Sb 3.000e-4, Zn 0.987 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5; `ORC-CRQ4VNHCGB` | | | 536.2 | eutectic: L = ω + (Cd) + (Zn) | L: Sb 0.0072, Zn 0.257; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.358; (Cd): Sb 3.000e-4, Zn 0.045; (Zn): Sb 2.000e-4, Zn 0.988 | model | [2] Zabdyr 1997 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6; `ORC-OHEQDSZKBJ` | | | 533.73 | eutectic: L -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + (Cd) + (Zn) | L: Sb 0.013, Zn 0.268; (Cd): Sb 0, Zn 0.041; (Zn): Sb 0, Zn 0.99; ε: Sb 0.429, Zn 0.4445 | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 8, p. 11, row 6; `ORC-UHVOMU23IY` | | ## Other properties ### Crystal structure (6) Table: Crystal structure, Cd–Sb–Zn system | Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote | |---|---:|---:|---|---|---|---|---| | Lattice a | 2.9788 Å | 594.3 (\<) | (Cd); _(Cd): Zn 0.0452_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 2; `ORC-X2ZYV5VPTH.4f690e` | | | Lattice a | 2.665 Å | 692.2 (\<) | (Zn); _(Zn): Cd 0.0147_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 10; `ORC-MD2U3JIZ2R.2996a9` | | | Lattice b | 7.7408 Å ± 1.000e-4 | 298.15 | ω-SbZn; _ω-SbZn: Cd 0.004, Sb 0.495, Zn 0.501_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 11; `ORC-QB2HAZ7DYA.3b2a14` | | | Lattice c | 8.0977 Å ± 1.000e-4 | 298.15 | ω-SbZn; _ω-SbZn: Cd 0.004, Sb 0.495, Zn 0.501_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 11; `ORC-QB2HAZ7DYA.74560c` | | | Lattice c | 5.6167 Å | 594.3 (\<) | (Cd); _(Cd): Zn 0.0452_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 2; `ORC-X2ZYV5VPTH.033957` | | | Lattice c | 4.947 Å | 692.2 (\<) | (Zn); _(Zn): Cd 0.0147_ | model | [1] Liu 2009 | Table 1, p. 2, row 10; `ORC-MD2U3JIZ2R.7f9923` | | ## Sources Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row). 1. Ya Liu, Jean-Claude Tedenac, Thermodynamic modeling of the Cd–Sb–Zn ternary system, Calphad 33, 684-694 (2009). [doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.08.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2009.08.006) 2. Leszek A. Zabdyr, Phase equilibria in ternary Cd-Sb-Zn system, Calphad 21, 349-358 (1997). [doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(97)00036-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-5916%2897%2900036-9) ## Please cite - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569 - R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065 Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes. ```bibtex @misc{orchid_literature_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } @misc{orchid_data_2026, author = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon}, title = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}}, version = {2026.10}, publisher = {Zenodo}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065}, note = {Version 1, machine-extracted} } ``` --- Derived data CC BY 4.0 ([licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)): cite ORCHID ([CITATION.cff](https://data.orchid-project.org/CITATION.cff)) and the original sources. Quotes are short excerpts kept so that each value can be checked; they remain under the publishers' copyright and are not relicensed. Source papers, page images and full text are not redistributed. Field reference: [SCHEMA.md](https://data.orchid-project.org/literature/SCHEMA.md). Machine-readable guide: [llms.txt](https://data.orchid-project.org/llms.txt). Found an error? The report link of a value (Markdown: its id, ORC-..., in the Location column) opens a pre-filled GitHub issue, https://github.com/orchid-calphad/orchid-data/issues/new?template=report-value-error.yml&record_id=\, carrying only the record id, source and value; [how to contribute](https://orchid-project.org/contribute/).