Ce–Ga system

71 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 21, model 50); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 16 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (12) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	21
model	50

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	43
phase transition	8
formation	20

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	M. Idbenali, C. Servant, M. Feddaoui, J. Phase Diag. Diffus., 34, 467-73(2013). doi:10.1007/s11669-013-0261-y	`dbc99ec4eb8fcd0e72aef355968da7bf8572de3f04e8ce5e9a5e752afe76c38f`	viewer · TDB · JSON
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	J. Liu, F. Li, J. Liu, X. Zhang, T. Ahmad, T. Liang, Monatsh. Chem., 150, 1225-33(2019). doi:10.1007/s00706-019-02420-8	`30f0cb2703063a0c456563dde7307025b88a42be18076d86deaff958c28498ca`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	1253.2	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.40015) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5) + CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.66667)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	1147.03	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.34465) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	1000	BCC_A2 (x(Ga) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.03014)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	929.57	CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.75577) + CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.96048)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	843.6	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.18248) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	759.46	FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.1156) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	749.86	CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.74567) + CEGA6_LT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	749.86	CEGA6_LT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.97297)
CeGa-13Idb.tdb	302.46	CEGA6_LT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.99735) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 (x(Ga) 1)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1232.41	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.415) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5) + CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.66665)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1232.41	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.41501) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5) + CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.66665)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1122.39	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.36226) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1122.39	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.3622) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1122.39	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.36239) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4) + CEGA_B33 (x(Ga) 0.5)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1071.99	BCC_A2 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0) + CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.66667)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1000	BCC_A2 (x(Ga) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.07679)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	1000	FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.07659)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	911.11	CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.7684) + CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.89584)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	830.15	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.21725) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	830.15	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.21722) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	830.15	LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.21748) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25) + CE3GA2 (x(Ga) 0.4)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	807.23	FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.1726) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	807.23	FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.17262) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	807.23	FCC_A1 (x(Ga) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.17255) + CE3GA_L12 (x(Ga) 0.25)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	748.26	CEGA2_C32 (x(Ga) 0.76579) + CEGA6_LT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714)
CeGa-19Liu.tdb	748.26	CEGA6_HT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + CEGA6_LT (x(Ga) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Ga) 0.93374)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CeGa-13Idb

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ce–Ga system (43)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1233.15	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa	Liq: Ga 0.421; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa: Ga 0.5	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report
1233	liq + CeGa2 → CeGa	L: Ga 0.421; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa: Ga 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 15 report
1233	liq + CeGa2 → CeGa	L: Ga 0.415; CeGa2: Ga 0.6667; CeGa: Ga 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 14 report
1231.15	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa	Liq: Ga 0.4086; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa: Ga 0.5	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
1231	liq + CeGa2 → CeGa	L: Ga 0.4086; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa: Ga 0.5	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 16 report
1127.15	Liq + CeGa -> Ce3Ga2	Liq: Ga 0.3564; CeGa: Ga 0.5; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report
1127	liq + CeGa → Ce3Ga2	L: Ga 0.3564; CeGa: Ga 0.5; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 13 report
1123.15	Liq + CeGa -> Ce3Ga2	Liq: Ga 0.37; CeGa: Ga 0.5; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report
1123	liq + CeGa → Ce3Ga2	L: Ga 0.37; CeGa: Ga 0.5; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 12 report
1123	liq + CeGa → Ce3Ga2	L: Ga 0.3623; CeGa: Ga 0.5; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.6667	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 11 report
1000.15	Liq + (Ce_HT2) -> (Ce)HT_1	Liq: Ga 0.031	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report
1000	liq. + bcc (Ce) → fcc(Ce)	L: Ga 0.0767	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report
1000	liq. + bcc (Ce) → fcc(Ce)	L: Ga 0.031	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 7 report
999.15	Liq + (Ce_HT2) -> (Ce)HT_1	Liq: Ga 0.058	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report
999	liq. + bcc (Ce) → fcc(Ce)	L: Ga 0.058	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report
911.35	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa6_HT	Liq: Ga 0.9438; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa6_HT: Ga 0.857143	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 16 report
911	liq + CeGa2 → β-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.9438; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; β-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 24 report
910.15	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa6_HT	Liq: Ga 0.956; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa6_HT: Ga 0.857143	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report
910	liq + CeGa2 → β-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.8958; CeGa2: Ga 0.7794; β-CeGa6: Ga 0.8571	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 22 report
910	liq + CeGa2 → β-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.956; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; β-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 23 report
837.85	Liq + Ce3Ga2 -> Ce3Ga	Liq: Ga 0.1922; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report
837	liq + Ce3Ga2 → Ce3Ga	L: Ga 0.1922; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report
830.15	Liq + Ce3Ga2 -> Ce3Ga	Liq: Ga 0.207; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report
830	liq + Ce3Ga2 → Ce3Ga	L: Ga 0.207; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report
830	liq + Ce3Ga2 → Ce3Ga	L: Ga 0.2172; Ce3Ga2: Ga 0.4; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 8 report
807	eutectic: liq. → Ce3Ga + fcc (Ce)	L: Ga 0.1726; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25; fcc (Ce): Ga 0	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report
773	eutectic: liq. → Ce3Ga + fcc (Ce)	L: Ga 0.6667; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	experimental	[2] Liu 2019 cites Yatsenko 1979 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report
768.15	eutectic: Liq -> Ce3Ga + (Ce)_HT1	Liq: Ga 0.18; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 3 report
768	eutectic: liq. → Ce3Ga + fcc (Ce)	L: Ga 0.18; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report
755	eutectic: liq. → Ce3Ga + fcc (Ce)	L: Ga 0.119; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report
754.95	eutectic: Liq -> Ce3Ga + (Ce)_HT1	Liq: Ga 0.119; Ce3Ga: Ga 0.25	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report
750.15	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa6_LT	Liq: Ga 0.977; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa6_LT: Ga 0.857143	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 17 report
750.05	Liq + CeGa2 -> CeGa6_LT	Liq: Ga 0.9523; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; CeGa6_LT: Ga 0.857143	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 18 report
750	liq + CeGa2 → α-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.977; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 26 report
750	liq + CeGa2 → α-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.9523; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 27 report
748	liq + CeGa2 → α-CeGa6	L: Ga 0.9337; CeGa2: Ga 0.7778; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.8571	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 25 report
334.15	(Ce_HT1) + Ce3Ga -> (Ce_RT)		experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report
334.15	(Ce_HT1) + Ce3Ga -> (Ce_RT)		model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
303	eutectic: liq → α-CeGa6 + orth.(Ga)	L: Ga 0.9995; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143; orth.(Ga): Ga 1	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 30 report
302.95	eutectic: Liq -> CeGa6-LT + (Ga)	Liq: Ga 0.9995; CeGa6-LT: Ga 0.857143; (Ga): Ga 1	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 20 report
302.15	eutectic: Liq -> CeGa6-LT + (Ga)	Liq: Ga 0.01; CeGa6-LT: Ga 0.857143; (Ga): Ga 1	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 19 report
302	eutectic: liq → α-CeGa6 + orth.(Ga)	L: Ga 1; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.857143; orth.(Ga): Ga 1	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 29 report
300	eutectic: liq → α-CeGa6 + orth.(Ga)	L: Ga 0.9937; α-CeGa6: Ga 0.8571; orth.(Ga): Ga 1	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 28 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ce–Ga system (20)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Ce0.21Ga0.79		-51.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.4	298.15	experimental			[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 8 report
Ce0.21Ga0.79		-46.1 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Chkhikvadze 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 7 report
Ce0.21Ga0.79		-36.7 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.9	298.15	experimental			[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 6 report
Ce3Ga	Ce3Ga	-50.727 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-24.233 (mp-aaaabdme)	-21.97 (oqmd-17084)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 20 report
Ce3Ga2	Ce3Ga2	-69.036 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-35.389 (mp-aaackyfv)	-44.021 (oqmd-1450840)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 19 report
Ce3Ga2	Ce3Ga2	-64.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-35.389 (mp-aaackyfv)	-44.021 (oqmd-1450840)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Chkhikvadze 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 18 report
CeGa	CeGa	-71.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.7	298.15	experimental	-45.635 (mp-aaacfyim)	-55.036 (oqmd-29083)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 17 report
CeGa	CeGa	-70.212 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-45.635 (mp-aaacfyim)	-55.036 (oqmd-29083)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 16 report
CeGa	CeGa	-64.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-45.635 (mp-aaacfyim)	-55.036 (oqmd-29083)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Chkhikvadze 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 15 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-102.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.1	298.15	experimental	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Yatsenko 1972	Table 4, p. 6, row 9 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-88.9 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.8	298.15	experimental	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Vnuchkova 1971	Table 4, p. 6, row 10 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-84.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.9	298.15	experimental	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 14 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-72.036 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 12 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-66.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Chkhikvadze 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 11 report
CeGa2	CeGa2	-57.382 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-56.989 (mp-aaaaadgz)	-66.477 (oqmd-662528)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 13 report
CeGa6_HT	CeGa6	-52.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 3	298.15	experimental	-31.098 (mp-aaaaabbj)	-34.197 (oqmd-19608)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 2 report
CeGa6_HT	CeGa6	-51.364 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-31.098 (mp-aaaaabbj)	-34.197 (oqmd-19608)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 3 report
CeGa6_HT	CeGa6	-48.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.7	298.15	experimental	-31.098 (mp-aaaaabbj)	-34.197 (oqmd-19608)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites F 1998	Table 4, p. 6, row 1 report
CeGa6_LT	CeGa6	-51.56 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-31.098 (mp-aaaaabbj)	-34.197 (oqmd-19608)	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 4, p. 6, row 4 report
CeGa6_LT	CeGa6	-30.9 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-31.098 (mp-aaaaabbj)	-34.197 (oqmd-19608)	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Chkhikvadze 1977	Table 4, p. 6, row 5 report

Other properties

Phase transition (8)

Phase transition, Ce–Ga system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1463 K	1463	congruent transformation	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	p. 5 report	The congruent melting of CeGa2 calculated at 1463 K is in very good agreement with the experimental data of Ref 8.
Phase transition	1717 K	1717	liq → CeGa2 L: Ga 0.6667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	model	[2] Liu 2019	Table 2, p. 5, row 17 report
Phase transition	1717 K	1717	liq → CeGa2 L: Ga 0.666667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	experimental	[2] Liu 2019 cites Dayan 1979 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 21 report
Phase transition	1727 K	1727	liq → CeGa2 L: Ga 0.6667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Massalski 1990	Table 2, p. 5, row 19 report
Phase transition	1727 K	1727	liq → CeGa2 L: Ga 0.6667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	model	[2] Liu 2019 cites Idbenali 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 20 report
Phase transition	1727.15 K	1727.15	Liq -> CeGa2 Liq: Ga 0.667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	model	[1] Idbenali 2013	Table 3, p. 5, row 14 report
Phase transition	1733 K	1733	liq → CeGa2 L: Ga 0.6667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	experimental	[2] Liu 2019 cites Yatsenko 1979 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 18 report
Phase transition	1733.15 K	1733.15	Liq -> CeGa2 Liq: Ga 0.667; CeGa2: Ga 0.666667	experimental	[1] Idbenali 2013 cites Massalski 1990	Table 3, p. 5, row 13 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Mohamed Idbenali, Colette Servant, M’barek Feddaoui, Thermodynamic Description of the Ce-Ga Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 34, 467-473 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11669-013-0261-y
Jinming Liu, Fei Li, Jinping Liu, Xu Zhang, Tahir Ahmad, Tongxiang Liang, Thermodynamic description of the Ce–Ga and Ga–Gd systems, Monatsh Chem 150, 1225-1233 (2019). doi:10.1007/s00706-019-02420-8

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}